Last reviewed · How we verify
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Fixed Dose Combination GSP 301 Nasal Spray (NS) Compared With Placebo Nasal Spray and Individual Monotherapy Formulations (Comparators) in Subjects (Aged 12 Years and Older) With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (SAR) (GSP 301-301)
Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GSP 301 NS compared to placebo NS and to individual monotherapies (comparators) as well as the efficacy of these monotherapies (comparators) versus placebo NS over 14 days of study treatment
Details
| Lead sponsor | Glenmark Specialty S.A. |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 1180 |
| Start date | 2016-03 |
| Completion | 2016-07 |
Conditions
- Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Interventions
- GSP 301 NS
- Olopatadine HCl NS
- Mometasone furoate NS
- GSP 301 Placebo NS
Primary outcomes
- Change in Average AM and PM Subject-reported 12-hour Reflective Total Nasal Symptoms Score (rTNSS) From Baseline to End of Treatment. — 14 days
Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) was calculated as the sum of 12-hour reflective scoring of the severity of four nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, nasal itching, sneezing). Subjects responded on a 4-point severity scale with scores ranging from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 3 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate). The rTNSS was calculated as the sum of the subject-reported severity scores for nasal symptoms, and value ranged from 0 (no signs/symptoms evident) to 12 (severe signs/symptoms that is hard to tolerate).
Countries
United States