Last reviewed · How we verify
A Randomized Comparison of Transcervical Foley Bulb With Vaginal Misoprostol to Vaginal Misoprostol Alone for Induction of Labor
A randomized, prospective trial will be offered to women admitted to the Roosevelt Hospital labor floor for labor induction. The hypothesis is that the simultaneous use of a foley bulb together with vaginal misoprostol will result in shorter induction to delivery time compared with vaginal misoprostol alone
Details
| Lead sponsor | St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 200 |
| Start date | 2015-09 |
| Completion | 2016-07 |
Conditions
- Pregnancy
Interventions
- misoprostol
- Foley bulb
Primary outcomes
- The Time Interval From Induction to Delivery: All Participants — Day 1
During labor from the start of the induction to the delivery - Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery: Nulliparous — Day 1
- Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery: Multiparous — Day 1
- Time From Induction to Delivery: VD — Day 1
Time (hours) from induction to delivery: Vaginal Delivery (VD) - Time From Induction to Delivery: CD — Day 1
Time (hours) from induction to delivery: Cesarean Delivery (CD) - Per Treatment Protocol: Time (Hours) From Induction to Delivery — day 1
Countries
United States