Adults 18 to 55, any sex, with Dry Eye Syndromes. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Change From Baseline in the Total Corneal Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse EyePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
Total corneal staining with fluorescein was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The sum of the total includes 3 regions of the cornea, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 (severe staining score of 4 in all three regions). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
7.05
± 1.011
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-1.51
± 1.466
Change From Baseline in the Total Conjunctival Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse EyePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
Total conjunctival staining with fluorescein was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The sum of the total includes 2 regions of the conjunctiva, resulting in a maximum possible score of 8 (severe staining score of 4 in both regions). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
4.57
± 1.237
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-0.61
± 1.238
Change From Baseline in the Central Region Staining Score With Fluorescein in the Worse EyePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
Staining with fluorescein in the central region of the eye was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
2.29
± 0.441
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-0.75
± 0.656
Change From Baseline in the Total Corneal Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse EyePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
Total corneal staining with lissamine green was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The sum of the total includes 3 regions of the cornea, resulting in a maximum possible score of 12 (severe staining score of 4 in all three regions). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
4.00
± 1.378
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-0.34
± 1.418
Change From Baseline in the Total Conjunctival Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse EyePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
Total conjunctival staining with lissamine green was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The sum of the total includes 2 regions of the conjunctiva, resulting in a maximum possible score of 8 (severe staining score of 4 in both regions). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
3.99
± 1.486
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-0.18
± 1.235
Change From Baseline in the Central Region Staining Score With Lissamine Green in the Worse EyePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
Staining with lissamine green in the central region of the eye was measured in the worse eye using the Ora Calibra™ (Scale 1.0) 5-point scale where 0= none (best), no staining to 4=severe staining (worst). The worse eye is defined as the worst eye at Baseline. A negative change from Baseline represents a decrease in staining (improvement).
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
0.85
± 0.822
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-0.24
± 0.524
Change From Baseline in Font SizePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
The minimum font (letter) size read correctly was assessed. Smaller font size (less points) indicates better ability. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement and a positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
9.0
± 0.00
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
0.0
± 0.21
Change From Baseline in Words Read IncorrectlyPrimary· Baseline, Month 6
The numbers of words read incorrectly are counted. A positive change from Baseline indicates a worsening (more words read incorrectly) and a negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
16.6
± 22.00
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-4.1
± 16.64
Change From Baseline in Time to Read PassagePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
The time to read passage (selected portion of text ) in seconds was assessed. A negative change from Baseline indicates an improvement (less time to read the passage).
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
126.0
± 28.64
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-0.7
± 24.48
Change From Baseline in Reading RatePrimary· Baseline, Month 6
Reading speed was assessed as the number of words read correctly calculated as words/minute. A positive change from Baseline indicates an improvement (more words read correctly/minute) and a negative change from Baseline indicates a worsening (less words read correctly/minute).
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
146.6
± 64.18
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-3.6
± 69.80
Change From Baseline in Tear Film Break Up Time (TFBUT) in the Worse EyeSecondary· Baseline, Month 6
TFBUT is defined as the time required for dry spots to appear on the surface of the eye after blinking. The longer it takes, the more stable the tear film. The worse eye is defined as the Worse Eye at Baseline. A positive number change from Baseline indicates improvement and a negative number change from Baseline indicates a worsening.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
2.38
± 1.073
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-0.31
± 1.258
Change From Baseline in Ocular Protection Index (OPI) 2.0 in the Worse EyeSecondary· Baseline, Month 6
A device was used to assess OPI 2.0. This technology measures blink and tear film break-up area. These values demonstrate the average area of tear deficiency/corneal exposure. The worse eye is defined as the worse eye at Baseline. A negative value indicates an improvement in corneal protection.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
1.38
± 2.064
Change from Baseline at Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
RESTASIS®
-0.87
± 1.975
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
RESTASIS®
Serious: 3/50 (6%)
Deaths: —
Serious adverse events (3 terms)
Reaction
System
RESTASIS®
Papillary thyroid carcinoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Other trials of Cyclosporine 0.05% Ophthalmic Emulsion
Trials testing the same drug.
NCT04734197 — A Research Study To See How Well an Eye Drop, SURF-100 (A Mycophenolic Acid/Betamethasone Sodium Phosphate Combination),
· Phase 2
· completed
Other recruiting trials for Dry Eye Syndromes
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07412860 — Clinical Investigation Between the Topical Administration of a Tear Substitute With Ancillary Medicinal Substance and Hy
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06913504 — Comparison Of Blue Light Filter Feature and Blue Blocking Lenses in Digital Device Users With Dry Eye Patients
· NA
· active not recruiting
NCT06913465 — The Impact of Hypothyroidism on Tear Production and Dry Eye Symptoms: Implications for Optometric Care
· active not recruiting
NCT06831253 — Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection in Dry Eye Syndrome
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06220474 — Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Non-Invasive RF Treatment in Refractory MGD
· NA
· recruiting
Other Allergan trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04609020 — Study to Evaluate Subject Satisfaction With Facial Appearance and Impact of Combined Facial Treatment
· Phase 4
· completed
NCT05452070 — A Study to Assess Adverse Events and Change in Disease Activity of HArmonyCa Lidocaine Injectable Gel for Mid Face Soft
· Phase 3
· completed
NCT05393089 — Study of AGN-190584 Eye Drops to Assess Safety and Efficacy in Participants Aged 40-80 Years With Pseudophakic Presbyopi
· Phase 2
· withdrawn
NCT05152576 — A Study To Assess the Adverse Effects and Change in Condition of OnabotulinumtoxinA X Injection in Adult Participants Wi
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT05088980 — Study to Assess Effectiveness and Adverse Events of JUVEDERM VOLBELLA With Lidocaine Injection in Correcting Infraorbita
· Phase 3
· completed
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Allergan
Last refreshed: 1 June 2017
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02554981.