Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02552030: iPARR

iPhone App Compared to Standard RR-measurement

Completed NA Last updated 14 February 2017
What this trial tests

NA trial testing cuff device (Omron HBP-1300-E Pro) in Hypertension in 1,019 participants. Completed in 31 December 2016.

Timeline
1 October 2015
Primary endpoint
25 April 2016
31 December 2016

Quick facts

Lead sponsorJens Eckstein
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment1,019
Start date1 October 2015
Primary completion25 April 2016
Estimated completion31 December 2016
Sites1 location across Switzerland

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Jens Eckstein

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Hypertension or Blood Pressure. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

In this Trial we compare a new application (App) running on an iPhone (Apple inc., Model 4S) to determine systolic blood pressure (RR) and compare it to conventional oscillometric measurements using an Omron HBP-1300-E Pro device. We will include 1000 participants and perform seven repetitive blood pressure measurements (3 iPhone, 4 Omron) in each person. Primary parameter will be the absolute difference (Delta) between the correlating blood pressure measurements in mmHg.

Publications & conference data

5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Reliability of single office blood pressure measurements.
    Burkard T, Mayr M, Winterhalder C, Leonardi L, et al · · 2018 · cited 40× · PMID 29530989 · DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312523
  2. Performance of a Blood Pressure Smartphone App in Pregnant Women: The iPARR Trial (iPhone App Compared With Standard RR Measurement).
    Raichle CJ, Eckstein J, Lapaire O, Leonardi L, et al · · 2018 · cited 23× · PMID 29632098 · DOI 10.1161/hypertensionaha.117.10647
  3. iPhone App compared with standard blood pressure measurement -The iPARR trial.
    Dörr M, Weber S, Birkemeyer R, Leonardi L, et al · · 2021 · cited 12× · PMID 33321118 · DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.12.003
  4. Impact of Single-Occasion American vs. Canadian Office Blood Pressure Measurement Recommendations on Blood Pressure Classification.
    Vischer AS, Mayr M, Socrates T, Winterhalder C, et al · · 2019 · cited 5× · PMID 30371728 · DOI 10.1093/ajh/hpy159
  5. How should we measure blood pressure? Implications of the fourth blood pressure measurement in office blood pressure.
    Vischer AS, Socrates T, Winterhalder C, Eckstein J, et al · · 2021 · cited 2× · PMID 33319471 · DOI 10.1111/jch.14130

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Hypertension

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02552030.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing