Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02527148

A Trial of Mechanical Axis vs Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Replacement

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 15 May 2025
What this trial tests

NA trial testing OtisMed® ShapeMatch® Technology in Arthroplasties in 100 participants. Completed in 19 December 2018.

Timeline
4 August 2011
Primary endpoint
9 April 2018
19 December 2018

Quick facts

Lead sponsorStryker South Pacific
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment100
Start date4 August 2011
Primary completion9 April 2018
Estimated completion19 December 2018

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Stryker South Pacific

Who can join

Adults 40 to 80, any sex, with Arthroplasties or Knee Replacement. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Oxford Knee Score Primary · Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months, 12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively

To demonstrate, through calculation of Oxford Knee Score (OKS) post operatively, that total knee replacement (TKR) performed using the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide provides improvement from preoperative levels of patient pain and function comparable to the improvement obtained with TKR performed using computer-assisted Navigation. Oxford Knee Scores will be calculated pre-operatively and at 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 2 years and 5 years. The OKS is a participant completed 12 question form on activities of daily living that assess function and pain. Scores can range from 0 to 48 with lower scor

Oxford preoperative
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon20.3± 5.7
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation21.1± 6.2
Oxford 6 weeks
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon32.5± 6.8
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation32.8± 7.7
Oxford 6 months
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon41.0± 4.8
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation38.2± 7.3
Oxford 12 months
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon41.8± 6.1
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation43.0± 7.7
Oxford 2 years
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon42.1± 6.1
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation41.1± 6.0
Oxford 5 years
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon41.4± 7.2
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation41.7± 6.3
Cost Effectiveness: Total Duration of Operating Procedure (Anaesthetic Time and Skin-to-skin Incision Time) Secondary · Intraoperative - participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes.

Skin to skin time is the time in minutes from initial skin incision to skin closure. Anaesthesia time is the time in minutes that anaesthesia administration is started to the time it is stopped. Data for anaesthesia time is not available due to an error on the original case report form that did not correctly capture anaesthesia time.

GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon82.6± 26
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation92.2± 32
Cost Effectiveness: Wound Length Secondary · Intraoperative - participants were followed for the duration of the operation, an average of 1 hour and 50 minutes.

To compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the procedure between the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide group and the computer-assisted Navigation control group the surgical incision length is reported in mm.

GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon223± 29
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation233± 34
Cost Effectiveness: Length of Stay in Hospital Secondary · 14 days

To compare the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of the procedure between the ShapeMatch® Cutting Guide group and the computer-assisted Navigation control group the length of stay in number of days spent in the hospital is reported..

GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon5.1± 3.0
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation4.2± 4.2
Cost Effectiveness: Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) From EQ-5D-3L Secondary · 12 months

A quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) takes into account both the quantity and quality of life generated by healthcare interventions. It is the arithmetic product of life expectancy and a measure of the quality of the remaining life-years. A QALY places a weight on time in different health states. A year of perfect health is worth 1 and a year of less than perfect health is worth less than 1. Death is considered to be equivalent to 0; however,some health states may be considered worse than death and have negative scores.

Preoperative QALY
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.507± 0.17
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation0.484± 0.21
12 Month QALY
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.895± 0.16
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation0.852± 0.19
Knee Pain Secondary · Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively

Pain at rest and pain during mobilization was measured using a 10 centimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Participants are asked to indicate their level of pain with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain.

Pre-op Pain at Rest
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon4.36± 2.03
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation4.20± 2.48
Pre-op Pain at Mobilisation
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon5.78± 2.32
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation6.01± 2.49
6-week Pain at Rest
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon1.95± 1.93
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation1.79± 2.01
6-week Pain at Mobilisation
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon2.51± 2.11
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation2.49± 2.00
6-month Pain at Rest
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.97± 1.78
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation1.20± 2.04
6-month Pain at Mobilisation
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon1.15± 1.97
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation1.50± 2.38
1-year Pain at Rest
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.53± 1.35
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation0.84± 1.63
1-year Pain at Mobilisation
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.79± 1.83
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation1.35± 2.3
The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) Secondary · Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively

The WOMAC is completed by the participant and measures five items for pain (score range 0-100), two for stiffness (score range 0-100), and 17 for functional limitation (score range 0-100). The total score is the sum of these three categories.

Pre-op
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon50.05± 13.07
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation50.36± 14.91
6-week
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon74.74± 11.75
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation73.06± 17.61
6-month
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon87.89± 9.73
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation81.79± 15.94
1-year
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon90.86± 11.14
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation86.79± 14.93
2-year
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon88.36± 13.60
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation85.46± 16.79
5-year
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon86.13± 15.49
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation89.14± 15.11
Health-related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-3L) Secondary · Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-month and 12 month visits, 2 years and 5 years

The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, extreme problems. The participant is asked to indicate his/her health state by indicating the most appropriate level for each of the 5 dimensions. Responses may be converted into a single summary index by applying a formula that essentially attaches values (also called weights) to each of the levels in each dimension. The index can be calculated by deducting the appropriate weights from 1= t

Pre-op EQ-5D Index
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.51± 0.17
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation0.48± 0.21
Pre-op EQ-5D VAS
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon71.43± 18.11
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation75.66± 14.28
6-week EQ-5D Index
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.67± 0.14
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation0.68± 0.18
6-week EQ-5D VAS
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon79.38± 13.58
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation80.28± 19.41
6-month EQ-5D Index
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.82± 0.18
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation0.78± 0.2
6-month EQ-5D VAS
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon86.00± 13.86
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation84.04± 14.52
1-year EQ-5D Index
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon0.89± 0.16
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation0.84± 0.20
1-year EQ-5D VAS
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon85.48± 12.46
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation85.91± 12.22
The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12) Secondary · 6 week, 6 month, 12 month , 2 years and 5 years visits

The Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is a 12 question form that asks the patient their level of awareness of their artificial joint in 12 scenarios commonly encountered in daily life. Scores can range from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating a better outcome (high degree of forgetting the joint in everyday life).

6 week
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon58.12± 25.53
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation57.21± 29.32
6 month
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon60.47± 29.57
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation59.96± 28.27
12 month
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon62.47± 28.99
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation62.01± 24.84
2 year
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon69.21± 25.93
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation66.22± 25.54
5 year
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon68.04± 28.824
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation74.12± 23.38
The International Knee Society Score (IKSS) Secondary · Preoperatively, 6-week, 6-months,12 months, 2 years and 5 years postoperatively

The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, range of motion (ROM) and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a minimum score of 0 to a maximum of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as "excellent," "good," "fair," or "poor," a higher value represents a better outcome.

Pre-op IKSS Pain
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon40.20± 15.87
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation37.33± 14.82
Pre-op IKSS Function
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon54.06± 15.70
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation55.50± 14.82
Pre-op Range of Motion
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon118.07± 11.27
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation116.17± 15.51
6 week IKSS Pain
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon63.02± 15.37
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation58.30± 18.28
6 week IKSS Function
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon63.33± 16.90
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation64.26± 22.26
6 week Range of Motion
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon108.64± 17.58
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation107.28± 14.99
6 month IKSS Pain
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon76.32± 12.72
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation68.77± 18.81
6 month IKSS Function
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon82.17± 17.72
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation76.85± 21.30
Perth CT Protocol Secondary · 3 months

The Perth CT protocol is a comprehensive assessment of total knee replacement (TKR) component position and orientation. The alignment of the TKR components is measured against the mechanical axis and the transepicondylar axis of the lower extremity. The posted data represents the mean angle between the femoral component and mechanical axis of the femur, the angle between tibial component and mechanical axis of the tibia, the tibial component slope relative to the sagittal mechanical axis, and the femoral component rotation relative to surgical epicondylar axis (positive value=external rotation

Coronal mechanical axis:hip knee ankle angle
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon-0.4± 3.5
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation-0.7± 2.0
Coronal angle fem comp and mech axis femur
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon2.0± 2.6
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation0.6± 1.6
Coronal angle tibial comp and mech axis tibia
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon-2.8± 3.1
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation-0.7± 1.9
Sagital tibial component slope
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon3.6± 2.5
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation1.3± 2.4
Femcomp rotationrelative to surg epicond axis+=ER
GroupValue95% CI
OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon-0.5± 2.5
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation1.5± 2.5

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 5-years. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

OtisMed® ShapeMatch® With Triathlon
Serious: 39/49 (80%)
Deaths: 0/49
Stryker Precision Knee Navigation
Serious: 38/50 (76%)
Deaths: 0/50

Serious adverse events (30 terms)

ReactionSystemOtisMed® ShapeMatch® With …Stryker Precision Knee Nav…
Non-operative siteSurgical and medical procedures
Non-operative siteMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Non-operative siteGastrointestinal disorders
Non-operative siteInfections and infestations
Non-operative siteRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Non-operative siteCardiac disorders
Non-operative siteNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-operative siteVascular disorders
Non-operative siteEye disorders
Operative siteSurgical and medical procedures
Non-operative siteGeneral disorders
Non-operative siteHepatobiliary disorders
Operative siteInfections and infestations
Non-operative siteRenal and urinary disorders
Operative siteMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Non-operative sitePsychiatric disorders
Non-operative siteSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Non-operative siteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Non-operative sideNervous system disorders
Non-operative siteReproductive system and breast disorders
Non-operative siteBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Non-operative siteEar and labyrinth disorders
Operative siteInvestigations
Non-operative siteMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Non-operative siteCongenital, familial and genetic disorders
Other adverse events (11 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemOtisMed® ShapeMatch® With …Stryker Precision Knee Nav…
Non-operative siteMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Non-operative siteSurgical and medical procedures
Operative siteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Non-operative siteGastrointestinal disorders
Operative siteProduct Issues
Non-operative siteInfections and infestations
Operative siteMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Non-operative siteEye disorders
Non-operative siteGeneral disorders
Non-operative siteInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Non-operative siteRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Non-operative site, Non-operative site, Non-operative site, Non-operative site, Non-operative site, Non-operative site, Non-operative site, Non-operative site.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02527148 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This is a prospective, randomized, longitudinal study of the clinical outcomes of osteoarthritis patients treated by two different alignment philosophies for total knee replacement. In this study ShapeMatch® cutting guides will be compared to the conventional approach.

Publications & conference data

3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award : No Difference in 2-year Functional Outcomes Using Kinematic versus Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A, Briant-Evans T, et al · · 2017 · cited 161× · PMID 27113595 · DOI 10.1007/s11999-016-4844-x
  2. No Difference in 5-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Young SW, Sullivan NPT, Walker ML, Holland S, et al · · 2020 · cited 73× · PMID 32039955 · DOI 10.1097/corr.0000000000001150
  3. No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial.
    Gibbons JP, Zeng N, Bayan A, Walker ML, et al · · 2025 · cited 17× · PMID 39145997 · DOI 10.1097/corr.0000000000003193

Verify or expand the search:

Other Stryker South Pacific trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02527148.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing