Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02442830: EDCAP

Comparing Early Capsule Deployment to Current Standard of Care for Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 7 August 2018
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Early Video Capsule Endoscopy in Melena in 87 participants. Completed in 2 July 2017.

Timeline
19 April 2015
Primary endpoint
2 July 2017
2 July 2017

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Massachusetts, Worcester
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposediagnostic
Enrollment87
Start date19 April 2015
Primary completion2 July 2017
Estimated completion2 July 2017
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Melena or Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Time to Localization of Bleeding Primary · Enrollment to localization of bleeding as measured in hours, up to 720 hours, whichever is sooner.

Time to localization of bleeding refers to the time after a patient is admitted to the emergency room and a bleeding source is localized. We defined localization of bleeding as endoscopic visualization of stigmata of recent hemorrhage.

GroupValue95% CI
Early Video Capsule Endoscopy219 – 31
Standard of Care Workup Group1613 – 31
Number of Participants With Localization of Bleeding by the End of Admission Secondary · Patient's will be assessed for the duration of their hospital stay and for thirty days afterwards.

This measurement counts the number of participants with a bleeding source localized by the end of admission.

GroupValue95% CI
Early Video Capsule Endoscopy27
Standard of Care Workup Group15

Sponsor's own description

The objectives of this study are to test whether there are statistically significant differences between the standard of care workup workup of non-hematemesis gastrointestinal bleeding by endoscopy \[upper, lower and other tests\], compared with deployment of a video capsule as the first test followed by the most appropriate endoscopic procedure based on video capsule findings, if needed. The investigators propose to examine differences in time to diagnosis, reduction in numbers of procedures, and length of stay between a standard of care workup protocol and our proposed protocol of early capsule endoscopy deployment.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. A randomized controlled trial comparing efficacy of early video capsule endoscopy with standard of care in the approach to nonhematemesis GI bleeding (with videos).
    Marya NB, Jawaid S, Foley A, Han S, et al · · 2019 · cited 41× · PMID 29935143 · DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2018.06.016

Verify or expand the search:

Other University of Massachusetts, Worcester trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02442830.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing