18 and older, any sex, with Hamstring Injury. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Reported Effects of Losartan for Hamstring Injury for Safety and TolerabilityPrimary· 4 weeks
Directly related to specific aim 1- Side effects, safety, and tolerability will be monitored by measuring vital signs, lab values via blood work, and number of adverse events, serious adverse events, and patient reported side effects.
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
0
Placebo
0
Losartan
0
Placebo
0
Losartan
0
Placebo
0
Losartan
0
Placebo
0
Recovery of Hamstring Muscle FunctionPrimary· 6 weeks; 6 months
For specific aim 2, hamstring muscle function of the injured leg was measured and compared to the contralateral leg using isometric hamstring force at 30, 60, and 90 degrees of knee flexion at 6 weeks and 6 months.
Data are expressed as a Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), which is the percent force of the injured hamstring compared to the force of the non-injured hamstring muscle.
6 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 30 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
91
42 – 139
Placebo
75
21 – 129
6 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 90 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
102
67 – 137
Placebo
77
69 – 85
6 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 60 deg knee flexion (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
79
59 – 98
Placebo
73
15 – 130
6 months: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 30 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
107
0 – 323
Placebo
95
0 – 355
6 months: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 90 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
106
0 – 290
Placebo
76
0 – 590
6 months: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 60 deg knee flexion (%, Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
83
45 – 121
Placebo
104
Recovery of Hamstring StructurePrimary· 6 months
For specific aim 2, recovery of hamstring structure was measured as the length of injury at 6 months as well as the change in proximal-distal length of injury from baseline to 6 month post-treatment MRI. Greater change in length represents greater healing.
Proximal-distal length of injury measured (MRI)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
0.8
Placebo
5.6
0 – 67
Change in proximal-distal length of injury from baseline (MRI)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
23
Placebo
17.6
0 – 140
Recovery of Hamstring StructurePrimary· 6 months
For specific aim 2, hamstring structure was measured in terms of the volume of fibrosis at 6 month MRI, as such smaller volume of fibrosis represents greater healing of the hamstring muscle. Hamstring structure was also determined by comparing the change of pre-treatment volume of the injury on the baseline MRI to the volume of fibrosis on the 6 month MRI.
Volume of fibrosis at 6 months (MRI)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
0.6
Placebo
0.7
0 – 3
Change of pre-treatment volume of the injury to 6 months (MRI)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
138.4
Placebo
1028
0 – 10691
Return to Prior Level of FunctionPrimary· 12 months
Return to prior level of function will be measured by the number of days from injury to full, unrestricted return to practice. This could have occurred at any timepoint after 6 weeks, so this did not necessarily occur at 12 months but it was monitored until the 12 month timepoint.
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
23
14 – 42
Placebo
35
7 – 70
Recurrence of InjuryPrimary· 12 months
Number of recurrent injuries will be monitored during the duration of the subjects participation.
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
0
Placebo
2
Losartan
2
Placebo
1
Recovery of Hamstring StructureSecondary· 6 months
For specific aim 2, restoration of hamstring structure was operationally defined as the ratio of the volume of the injured to contralateral leg hamstring volume 6 months after injury 6 months post-injury. The percent of hamstring volume of the injured leg was expressed as a percentage of the hamstring volume of the contralateral normal leg. The difference in volume between the involved and non-involved hamstring muscles was divided by the non-involved hamstring muscle volume and multiplied by 100.
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
0.91
Placebo
3.9
-2.8 – 10.7
Return to Prior Level of FunctionSecondary· 4 Weeks, 6 Weeks, 3 Months, 4 Months, 6 Months, 12 Months
For specific aims 3 and 4, return to prior level of sports activity was measured by the Marx Activity Scale Score, which ranges from 0 to 16, with 16 being the highest level of sports activity. The frequency of participants who achieved the same or better Marx score at follow-up compared to baseline was calculated. Differences from baseline to each follow-up timepoint were calculated by subtracting the follow-up scores from baseline. Any difference of 0 or a negative number indicated the participants achieved the same level of sports activity or better. Positive differences indicated they did
Marx Activity Level Score: Achieved prior level or better at 4 Weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
1
Placebo
1
Marx Activity Level Score: Achieved prior level or better at 6 Weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
1
Placebo
1
Marx Activity Level Score: Achieved prior level or better at 3 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
2
Placebo
3
Marx Activity Level Score: Achieved prior level or better at 4 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
1
Placebo
3
Marx Activity Level Score: Achieved prior level or better at 6 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
1
Placebo
1
Marx Activity Level Score: Achieved prior level or better at 12 Months
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
1
Placebo
1
Recovery of Hamstring FlexibilitySecondary· 6 weeks; 6 months
For specific aim 2, hamstring muscle flexibility of the injured leg was measured and compared to the contralateral leg using the popliteal angle at 6 weeks and 6 months after randomization. The popliteal angle was measured with a goniometer. Recovery of hamstring flexibility was operationally defined as the difference in the popliteal angle between the contralateral normal leg minus the hamstring injured leg. Positive differences between the contralateral and injured leg indicated decreased hamstring flexibility.
Difference in popliteal angle between injured and non-injured limb at 6 weeks
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
1.0
-11.7 – 13.7
Placebo
-1.3
-7.1 – 4.4
Difference in popliteal angle between injured and non-injured limb at 6 months
For specific aim 2, hamstring muscle function of the injured leg was measured and compared to the contralateral leg using isometric hamstring force at 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, and 4 weeks. Data were expressed as a Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), which is the percent strength of the injured hamstring in comparison to the strength of the non-injured hamstring muscle.
1 week: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 30 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
70.8
0.3 – 141.2
Placebo
54.9
-37.2 – 147.1
1 week: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 90 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
83.9
62.2 – 105.6
Placebo
39.8
-59.7 – 139.2
2 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 30 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
83.3
39.8 – 126.8
Placebo
50.1
28.8 – 71.4
2 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 90 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
93.8
60.1 – 127.5
Placebo
44.6
23.1 – 66.2
3 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 30 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
103.0
-24.1 – 230.2
Placebo
87.2
47.9 – 126.4
3 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 90 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
95.9
-0.7 – 192.5
Placebo
69.1
-1.3 – 139.4
4 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 30 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
79.1
45.6 – 112.7
Placebo
82.5
44.2 – 120.7
4 weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isometric strength at 90 deg knee flexion (Handheld dynamometer)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
106.5
-35.3 – 248.3
Placebo
91.6
69.0 – 114.1
Recovery of Hamstring Muscle FunctionSecondary· 6 weeks, 6 months
For specific aim 2, hamstring muscle function of the injured leg was measured on the Biodex and compared to the contralateral leg using isokinetic peak torque at 60 degrees and 180 degrees per second at 6 weeks and 6 months. Data were expressed as a Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), which is the percent peak torque of the injured hamstring compared to the peak torque of the non-injured hamstring muscle.
The isokinetic testing was not consistently collected, so there are limited results to present at 6 months.
6 Weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isokinetic peak torque at 60 deg per second (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
96.5
Placebo
202.7
6 Weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isokinetic peak torque at 180 deg per second (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
104.1
Placebo
71.2
6 Months: Limb Symmetry Index isokinetic peak torque at 60 deg per second (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
105.3
6 Months: Limb Symmetry Index isokinetic peak torque at 180 deg per second (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
81.3
Recovery of Hamstring Muscle FunctionSecondary· 6 weeks, 6 months
For specific aim 2, hamstring muscle function of the injured leg was measured on the Biodex and compared to the contralateral leg using isokinetic total hamstring work at 60 degrees per second and 180 degrees per second at 6 weeks and 6 months. Data were expressed as a Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), which is the percent total work of the injured hamstring compared to the total work of the non-injured hamstring muscle.
The isokinetic testing was not consistently collected, so there are limited results to present at 6 months.
6 Weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isokinetic total hamstring work at 60 deg per second (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
108.9
Placebo
484.2
6 Weeks: Limb Symmetry Index isokinetic total hamstring work at 180 deg per second (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
134.2
Placebo
63.3
6 Months: Limb Symmetry Index isokinetic total hamstring work at 60 deg per second (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
113.8
6 Months: Limb Symmetry Index isokinetic total hamstring work at 180 deg per second (Biodex)
Group
Value
95% CI
Losartan
78.9
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 12 months.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The goal of this study is to determine safety and tolerability of Losartan when used for treatment of an acute grade II or III hamstring strain and determining the effect of losartan on recovery of hamstring muscle function. Subjects will be adults age 18 and older with grade 2 or 3 hamstring injury who participate in greater than 100 hours per year in Level 1 or Level 2 athletics or have a similar activities or physical work load (e.g. military personnel). Subjects will undergo examination, MRI, and functional assessment before, during, and after 4 weeks of losartan (50mg QD) or placebo.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by James J. Irrgang
Last refreshed: 2 May 2024
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02263729.