Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT02124655

Antiplaque Effect of Essential Oils and 0.2% Chlorhexidine on an in Situ Model of Oral Biofilm Growth: a Randomised Clinical Trial.

Completed Phase 4 Last updated 26 April 2014
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing Essential oils in Oral Biofilm in 15 participants. Completed.

Timeline
1 September 2012
Primary endpoint
1 June 2013

Quick facts

Lead sponsorUniversity of Santiago de Compostela
PhasePhase 4
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Designcrossover
Maskingdouble
Primary purposeprevention
Enrollment15
Start date1 September 2012
Primary completion1 June 2013
Sites1 location across Spain

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

University of Santiago de Compostela

Who can join

Adults 20 to 45, any sex, with Oral Biofilm or Mouthwash. Healthy volunteers can join.

What's being measured

Primary outcomes are the specific endpoints the trial is designed to prove or disprove.

Sponsor's own description

The accumulation and maturation of oral biofilm in the gingival margin is widely recognised to be the primary aetiological factor in the development of chronic gingivitis. Based on this association, the current treatment of gingivitis is focused on biofilm disruption, which will normally include mechanical processes, both professionally and at home. However, for patients, it is not easy to achieve a proper level of plaque control. The efficient plaque control techniques are very time consuming and require a special motivation and skills for their optimum use. It was at this point where mouthwashes become important, due to the fact that they include diverse types of antimicrobial agents to complement the results of mechanical oral hygiene measures. Chlorhexidine is considered the "gold standard" of oral antiseptics; nevertheless it has not been recommended for long periods of time due to its well-known secondary effects. All of these inconveniences have limited its acceptability among dental professionals and users; in contrast, however, are the exceptional antiseptic properties, promoting the interest of researchers in other alternative antiplaque agents. Mouthwashes containing essential oils in their formulation have received a lot of attention. Their antiplaque activity has been demonstrated in numerous clinical studies, in which they were used in conjunction with mechanical oral hygiene measures. In order to achieve a better understanding of the clinical effects that antimicrobial agents produce in the interior of the biofilm, it is necessary to apply a methodology in which the biofilm grows directly in the interior of the oral cavity but its three dimensional structure is not distorted by manipulation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in situ antiplaque effect of 2 antimicrobial agents (essential oils formulation and 0.2% chlorhexidine) in the short term with a posterior analysis on "non-destructured" biofilm with Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope combined with fluorescence staining.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Antiplaque effect of essential oils and 0.2% chlorhexidine on an in situ model of oral biofilm growth: a randomised clinical trial.
    Quintas V, Prada-López I, Donos N, Suárez-Quintanilla D, et al · · 2015 · cited 22× · PMID 25689859 · DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0117177

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Essential oils

Trials testing the same drug.

Other University of Santiago de Compostela trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02124655.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing