A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Enzalutamide With Trastuzumab in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Positive (HER2+), Androgen Receptor Positive (AR+) Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
CompletedPhase 2Results postedLast updated 4 April 2025
What this trial tests
Phase 2 trial testing Enzalutamide in HER2 Amplified in 103 participants. Completed in 30 January 2024.
18 and older, female only, with HER2 Amplified or Advanced Breast Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)Primary· Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks through week 49, and then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death; the median duration of treatment was 70 days, and the maximum was 660 days.
Clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of evaluable participants with best objective response of confirmed complete response or partial response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, or prolonged stable disease (≥ 24 weeks). Complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, and lymph nodes all \< 10 mm in short axis. Partial response (PR) was defined as disappearance of target lesions or a ≥ 30% decrease in the size of target lesions, with persistence of non-target lesions and no new lesions. S
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
23.6
15.2 – 33.8
Overall Response Rate at Week 24Secondary· 24 weeks
Overall response rate was defined as the percentage of evaluable participants with a best objective response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST 1.1. Complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, and lymph nodes all \< 10 mm in short axis. Partial response was defined as disappearance of target lesions or a ≥ 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with persistence of non-target lesions and no new lesions. PR and CR required confirmation with equivalent or improved assessment no less than 4 wee
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
3.4
0.7 – 9.5
Best Overall Response RateSecondary· Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks through week 49, and then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death; the median duration of treatment was 70 days, and the maximum was 660 days.
Best overall response was the best response across all time points, based on investigator assessments. Best overall response rate was defined as the percentage of evaluable participants with a best objective response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at any time during the study per RECIST 1.1. Complete response was defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, and lymph nodes all \< 10 mm in short axis. Partial response was defined as disappearance of target lesions or a ≥ 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with persis
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
4.5
1.2 – 11.1
Progression-free SurvivalSecondary· From the date of first dose of study drug until disease progression or death; the median duration of treatment was 70 days, and the maximum was 660 days.
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose of enzalutamide until the date of disease progression per RECIST 1.1, or death from any cause on study, whichever occurred first. Participants who initiated another antitumor therapy before documented progressive disease (PD) or death, or who progressed or died after missing 2 or more consecutive radiological assessments were censored at the date of the last radiological assessment showing no progression. Progressive disease was defined as a ≥ 20% increase in the size of target lesions and at least a 5 mm increase in
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
105.0
61 – 116
Time to ProgressionSecondary· From the date of first dose of study drug until disease progression or death; the median duration of treatment was 70 days, and the maximum was 660 days.
Time to progression was defined as the time from the first date of enzalutamide treatment until the date of disease progression per RECIST 1.1. Participants who initiated another anti-tumor therapy before documented PD, who progressed after missing two or more consecutive radiological assessments or who died before disease progression were censored at the date of the last radiological assessment showing no progression.
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
108.0
61 – 116
Duration of ResponseSecondary· Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks through week 49, and then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death; the median duration of treatment was 70 days, and the maximum was 660 days..
Duration of response was defined as the time from the date of first documentation of response (CR or PR) until the date of disease progression per RECIST 1.1. Participants who initiated another anti-tumor therapy before documented PD, progressed after missing two or more consecutive radiological assessments or who died before disease progression were censored at the date of the last radiological assessment showing no progression.
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
NA
NA – NA
Time to ResponseSecondary· From the date of first dose of study drug until disease progression or death; the median duration of treatment was 70 days, and the maximum was 660 days.
Time to response was defined as the time from the first date of enzalutamide treatment to initial CR or PR and was calculated for participants with a CR or PR.
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
57
57 – 222
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Secondary· From the first dose date of study drug to 30 days after the last dose date of study drug or the start of subsequent treatment or date of death, whichever was first (Up to 3031 days)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered study drug/who underwent study procedures and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. Abnormalities identified during medical tests were defined as an AE if they induced clinical signs/symptoms, required active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study medication, or were clinically significant to the investigator. An AE was defined as serious if any of the following resulted: Death, was life-threatening, persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruptio
Any treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE)
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
97
Enzalutamide Related TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
75
Trastuzumab Related TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
40
Any Drug Related TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
78
Deaths
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
4
Serious TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
24
Enzalutamide Related Serious TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
3
Trastuzumab Related Serious TEAE
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
0
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From the first dose date of study drug to 30 days after the last dose date of study drug or the start of subsequent treatment or date of death, whichever is first (Up to 3031 days)..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
Serious: 24/103 (23%)
Deaths: 7/103
Serious adverse events (30 terms)
Reaction
System
Enzalutamide + Trastuzumab
Malignant neoplasm progression
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
Nausea
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
Vomiting
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
Back pain
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
Abdominal pain
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
Pneumonia
Infections and infestations
—
Dyspnoea
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
—
Diarrhoea
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
Dyspepsia
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
Asthenia
General disorders
—
General physical health deterioration
General disorders
—
Pyrexia
General disorders
—
Escherichia urinary tract infection
Infections and infestations
—
Infection
Infections and infestations
—
Accidental overdose
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
Ankle fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
Lower limb fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
Post procedural haemorrhage
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
Spinal compression fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
Brain neoplasm malignant
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
Metastases to skin
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
Myxoid liposarcoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
Skin cancer
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
Skin neoplasm bleeding
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzalutamide with trastuzumab in patients with HER2+ AR+ metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer.
Publications & conference data
8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07287150 — A Study to Test Inavolisib Treatment in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07226986 — A Phase Ib/II Open-label Study of AMO959 With Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan (AAA617) in Combination With ARPI i
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07277270 — A Study of GSK5764227 in Combination With Standard of Care (SoC) or Other Agents in Participants With Advanced Solid Tum
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07028853 — This Study Will Explore Whether a Combination of the Investigational Drug Mevrometostat (PF-06821497) and Enzalutamide W
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT06922318 — The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07488676 — A Study of ASP546C in Adults With Gastroesophageal Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer or Other Solid Tumors
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07475806 — A Study to Find Out if Enfortumab Vedotin Given With Pembrolizumab Helps People With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Keep
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07425574 — A Study to Learn How Stargardt-type Eye Conditions Progress in Children and Adults
· recruiting
NCT07409272 — A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Setidegrasib, Given With Either mFOLFIRINOX or NALIRIFOX Chemotherap
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07287995 — A Study of ASP2998 Given by Itself and Given With Standard Therapies in People With Solid Tumors
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc.
Last refreshed: 4 April 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02091960.