MTD:Highest dose level at which \<33% of participants experience dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle1. DLT: \>=Grade(G)3: - nonhematologic toxicity, - nausea/vomiting lasting \>48hrs(uncontrolled by aggressive antiemetic), - diarrhea lasting \>48hrs (unresponsive to antidiarrheal drug); G4 neutropenia lasting \>7days; Febrile neutropenia (ANC\<1000/mm\^3 with body temperature=\>38.3°C/sustained temperature \>=38°C for \>1hr; Thrombocytopenia G4/G3 with bleeding, required blood transfusion; Corneal disorder worsened by 1 grade or more; Increased phosphorus: \>=9mg/dL or \>=7mg/dL lasting
RP2D was MTD or less. MTD: Highest dose level at which \<33% of participants experience DLT) during Cycle1. DLT: \>=Grade(G)3: - nonhematologic toxicity, - nausea/vomiting lasting \>48hrs(uncontrolled by aggressive antiemetic), - diarrhea lasting \>48hrs (unresponsive to antidiarrheal drug); G4 neutropenia lasting \>7days; Febrile neutropenia (ANC\<1000/mm\^3 with body temperature=\>38.3°C/sustained temperature \>=38°C for \>1hr; Thrombocytopenia G4/G3 with bleeding, required blood transfusion; Corneal disorder worsened by 1 grade or more; Increased phosphorus: \>=9mg/dL or \>=7mg/dL lasting f
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing
NA
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QD Dosing
20
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Percentage of Participants With Objective ResponsePrimary· Up to approximately 50.5 months (through cut-off date 29-May-2021) for Cohorts 1 to 6; up to approximately 27.5 months (through cut-off date 30-Jun-2019) for pooled sub-cohorts
Objective response was defined as proportion of participants who had achieved best overall response of partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. The CR was defined as a disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to \<10 millimeters (mm) and PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. For Cohorts 1 to 6: Objective response was based on Independent Review Committee (IRC) and for pooled Sub-cohort:
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 1: Dose Expansion Cohort 1
15.8
7.5 – 27.9
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 2
8.8
1.9 – 23.7
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 3
13.3
1.7 – 40.5
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 4
0
0.0 – 24.7
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 5
12.5
2.7 – 32.4
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 6
0
0.0 – 12.8
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Pooled Sub-cohort
33.3
16.5 – 54.0
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective ResponsePrimary· Up to approximately 37.5 months (through cut-off date 29-May-2021)
Objective response was defined as proportion of participants who had achieved best overall response of PR or CR per RECIST v1.1. CR was defined as a disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must had reduction in short axis to \<10 mm and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions. The Phase 2 evaluation of objective response was based on central independent CT/MRI image assessment.
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 2
41.7
32.1 – 51.9
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Duration of Response (DOR)Secondary· Up to approximately 50.5 months (through cut-off date 29-May-2021) for Cohorts 1 to 6; up to approximately 27.5 months (through cut-off date 30-Jun-2019) for pooled sub-cohorts
A DOR was defined as the time (in months) from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who started subsequent anticancer therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last tumor assessments prior to initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapy. For Cohorts 1 to 6: DOR was based on IRC and for Group 3, 4, 5, 6 and for pooled Sub-cohort: DOR was based on investigator review.
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 1: Dose Expansion Cohort 1
6.18
2.8 – 10.6
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 2
3.52
2.8 – 4.3
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 3
2.45
1.4 – 3.4
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 5
2.79
2.0 – 4.1
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Pooled Sub-cohort
8.77
3.5 – 20.8
Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)Secondary· Up to approximately 37.5 months (through cut-off date 29-May-2021)
A DOR was defined as the time (in months) from the first documentation of response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who started subsequent anticancer therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last tumor assessments prior to initiation of the subsequent anticancer therapy. Kaplan-Meier method was used for the analysis.
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 2
8.31
2.1 – 24.8
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Disease Control Rate (DCR)Secondary· Up to approximately 50.5 months (through cut-off date 29-May-2021) for Cohorts 1 to 6; up to approximately 27.5 months (through cut-off date 30-Jun-2019) for pooled sub-cohort
A DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with objective evidence of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD), except that there was no requirement for a confirmation of an SD, if it is maintained for at least 6 weeks post treatment initiation. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes might had reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient in
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 1: Dose Expansion Cohort 1
66.7
52.9 – 78.6
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 2
23.5
10.7 – 41.2
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 3
33.3
11.8 – 61.6
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 4
38.5
13.9 – 68.4
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 5
54.2
32.8 – 74.4
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 6
22.2
8.6 – 42.3
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Pooled Sub-cohort
66.7
46.0 – 83.5
Phase 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR)Secondary· Up to approximately 37.5 months (through cut-off date 29-May-2021)
A DCR was defined as the proportion of participants with objective evidence of CR, PR, or SD, except that there was no requirement for a confirmation of an SD response, if it is maintained for at least 6 weeks post treatment initiation. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes might had reduction in short axis to \<10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as a reference the Baseline sum diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase t
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 2
82.5
73.8 – 89.3
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Secondary· up to approximately 27.5 months (through cut-off date 30-Jun-2019)
A PFS was defined as the time (in months) from the day of the first dose to the date of first documented disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. Participants who died without a reported disease progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death, participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last tumor assessment, participants who had no on-study assessments and did not die were censored on the first dosing date, and participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progres
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 1: Dose Expansion Cohort 1
4.1
2.7 – 6.9
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 2
1.9
1.3 – 4.9
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 3
1.8
1.3 – 4.7
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 4
1.3
0.9 – 4.1
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 5
3.5
1.7 – 6.8
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 6
2.7
1.4 – 2.7
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Pooled Sub-cohort
6.9
4.6 – 10.8
Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Secondary· Up to approximately 37.5 months (through cut-off date 29-May-2021)
A PFS was defined as the time (in months) from the day of the first dose to the date of first objectively documented disease progression or death (any cause), whichever occurred first. Participants who had died without a reported disease progression were considered to have progressed on the date of their death, participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last tumor assessment, participants who had no on-study assessments and did not die were censored on the first dosing date, and participants who started any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reporte
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 2
8.9
6.7 – 11.0
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Overall Survival (OS)Secondary· up to approximately 27.5 months (through cut-off date 30-Jun-2019)
An OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of the first dose to the death date. In the absence of death confirmation or for participants alive as of the OS cut-off date, survival time was censored at the date of last study follow-up, or the cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 1: Dose Expansion Cohort 1
11.4
8.1 – 15.1
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 2
11.8
5.5 – NA
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 3
8.6
2.1 – NA
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 4
5.8
4.6 – NA
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 5
10.5
6.7 – NA
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 6
7.2
5.6 – NA
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Pooled Sub-cohort
NA
12.2 – NA
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)Secondary· Up to approximately 37.5 months (through cut-off date 29-May-2021)
An OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of the first dose to the death date. In the absence of death confirmation or for participants alive as of the OS cut-off date, survival time was censored at the date of last study follow-up, or the cut-off date, whichever was earlier.
Group
Value
95% CI
Phase 2
20.0
16.4 – 24.6
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From the first dose administration up to approximately up to 59.5 months for Phase 1 Dose escalation; up to 50.5 months for Phase 1 Dose expansion Cohorts and up to 37.5 months for Phase 2.
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 8 mg
Serious: 1/6 (17%)
Deaths: 0/6
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 16 mg
Serious: 0/3 (0%)
Deaths: 0/3
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 24 mg
Serious: 1/3 (33%)
Deaths: 0/3
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 36 mg
Serious: 1/3 (33%)
Deaths: 0/3
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 56 mg
Serious: 1/3 (33%)
Deaths: 0/3
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 80 mg
Serious: 2/5 (40%)
Deaths: 0/5
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 120 mg
Serious: 4/4 (100%)
Deaths: 1/4
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 160 mg
Serious: 7/8 (88%)
Deaths: 0/8
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QOD Dosing: 200 mg
Serious: 4/7 (57%)
Deaths: 2/7
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QD Dosing: 4 mg
Serious: 0/4 (0%)
Deaths: 0/4
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QD Dosing: 8 mg
Serious: 1/5 (20%)
Deaths: 0/5
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QD Dosing: 16 mg
Serious: 9/14 (64%)
Deaths: 2/14
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QD Dosing: 20 mg
Serious: 3/7 (43%)
Deaths: 1/7
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: QD Dosing: 24 mg
Serious: 6/14 (43%)
Deaths: 1/14
Phase 1: Dose Expansion Cohort 1
Serious: 27/57 (47%)
Deaths: 40/57
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 2
Serious: 13/34 (38%)
Deaths: 22/34
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 3
Serious: 10/15 (67%)
Deaths: 12/15
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 4
Serious: 9/13 (69%)
Deaths: 11/13
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 5
Serious: 13/24 (54%)
Deaths: 15/24
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Cohort 6
Serious: 14/27 (52%)
Deaths: 17/27
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Sub-cohort 2
Serious: 0/8 (0%)
Deaths: 1/8
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: Sub-cohort 1
Serious: 0/19 (0%)
Deaths: 9/19
Phase 2
Serious: 42/103 (41%)
Deaths: 58/103
Serious adverse events (157 terms)
Reaction
System
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Escalation: …
Phase 1: Dose Expansion Co…
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: C…
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: C…
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: C…
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: C…
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: C…
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: S…
Phase 1: Dose Expansion: S…
Phase 2
Disease progression
General disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Ascites
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Pyrexia
General disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Abdominal pain
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Bile duct obstruction
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Sepsis
Infections and infestations
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Colitis
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Intestinal obstruction
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Hepatic failure
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Biliary tract infection
Infections and infestations
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Urinary tract infection
Infections and infestations
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Fall
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Overdose
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Blood bilirubin increased
Investigations
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Decreased appetite
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Dehydration
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Tumour pain
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Headache
Nervous system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Hemiparesis
Nervous system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Migraine
Nervous system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Transient ischaemic attack
Nervous system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Acute kidney injury
Renal and urinary disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Dyspnoea
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Anaemia
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Other adverse events (336 terms — click to expand)
This is an open-label, nonrandomized, Phase 1/2 study for the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor futibatinib (TAS-120). The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and anti-tumor activity of futibatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors with and without genomic FGF/FGFR abnormalities. The study will be conducted in 3 parts:
1. Dose escalation portion to determine the -Maximum Tolerated Dose and/ or Recommended Phase 2 Dose of futibatinib.
2. Phase 1 expansion portion to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of futibatinib in patients with tumors harboring FGF/FGFR aberrations, including patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), primary central nervous system tumors, urothelial carcinoma, breast cancer, gastric cancer.
3. Phase 2 study portion to confirm objective response rate of futibatinib in intrahepatic CCA patients with tumors harboring FGFR2 gene rearrangements (incl fusions).
Publications & conference data
8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT06263153 — Futibatinib in Combination With Durvalumab Prior to Cystectomy for the Treatment of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Patie
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT05827614 — Study of the CHK1 Inhibitor BBI-355, an ecDNA-directed Therapy (ecDTx), and the RNR Inhibitor BBI-825, in Subjects With
· Phase 1
· active not recruiting
NCT05036681 — A Phase II Study of Futibatinib and Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Microsatellite Stable Endometrial Carcinoma
· Phase 2
· terminated
NCT04828486 — Futibatinib and Pembrolizumab for Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic FGF19 Positive BCLC Stage A, B, or C Liver Cancer
· Phase 2
· completed
NCT04601857 — Futibatinib and Pembrolizumab Combination in the Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
· Phase 2
· terminated
Other recruiting trials for Cholangiocarcinoma
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07486713 — Olutasidenib DDI Study in Patients With IDH1 Mutation Positive Malignancies
· Phase 4
· recruiting
NCT07291947 — PULSAR Combined With Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07359586 — Laryngopharyngeal Injury After Endotracheal Intubation Under General Anesthesia
· recruiting
NCT07263217 — Mechanistic Study on the Protective and Regenerative Effects of Spirulina in Hepatectomy-Related Liver Injury
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07128199 — A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Zipalertinib Versus Placebo for Adjuvant Treatment in Participants With Sta
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT05973773 — REZILIENT3 (REsearching ZIpaLertinib In Egfr Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Tumors)
· Phase 3
· active not recruiting
NCT05967689 — A Study of Zipalertinib in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT05765734 — A Study of TAS3351 in NSCLC Patients With EGFRmt
· Phase 1
· terminated
NCT05403450 — A Study of Tolinapant in Combination With Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine and Oral Decitabine/Cedazuridine Alone in Partici
· Phase 1
· active not recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Taiho Oncology, Inc.
Last refreshed: 27 March 2025
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT02052778.