Last reviewed · How we verify
Artemether-lumefantrine vs Chloroquine in Patients With Acute Uncomplicated P. Knowlesi Malaria: a Randomized Open Label Trial in Sabah, Malaysia (CAN KNOW Trial)
Preliminary studies have supported the background efficacy of local standard anti-malarial medications in the treatment of uncomplicated knowlesi malaria, however there are no current WHO treatment guidelines for this infection. There are both health cost benefits to a more rapidly acting agent, and due to difficulties with microscopic identification there may be more effective treatment for all malaria species if an aligned treatment guideline could be supported. We are currently conducting a separate RCT using a similar protocol evaluating artesunate-mefloquine versus chloroquine for uncomplicated P. knowlesi malaria. However artemether-lumefantrine should also be compared against chloroquine due to the fact it is also a first line anti-malarial recommended in Malaysia, and there are potential differences in efficacy due to the different administration, absorption and half-life of artemether-lumefantrine. The investigators aim to test whether the fixed combination of artesunate-mefloquine is superior to chloroquine in order to define the optimal treatment for both uncomplicated P. knowlesi infection in both adults and children in this region.
Details
| Lead sponsor | Menzies School of Health Research |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 123 |
| Start date | 2014-01 |
| Completion | 2015-03 |
Conditions
- Uncomplicated Knowlesi Malaria
Interventions
- Artemether-lumefantrine combination
- Chloroquine
Primary outcomes
- Parasite clearance — 24 hours
The primary endpoint is the therapeutic efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine versus chloroquine, as defined by the assessment of microscopic P. knowlesi parasite clearance 24 hours after initiation of treatment.
Countries
Malaysia