Last reviewed · How we verify
Compare Articaine 1:100.000, 4% Epinephrine, Subperiosteal With Loco-regional Anesthesia for Placing Dental Implants in Posterior Mandible - Double-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
In patients that are going to receive a dental implant in the posterior mandible (distal from canine), does the subperiosteal anesthetic technique with Articaine 1:100.000 4 % Epinephrine compared to the loco-regional one, produces the same analgesia during surgery ?
Details
| Lead sponsor | Implantology Institute |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 4 |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Enrolment | 88 |
| Start date | 2017-04-01 |
| Completion | 2024-08 |
Conditions
- Surgical Complications From Local Anesthesia
- Dental Implant Failed
- Anesthesia Complications
- Anesthesia Morbidity
Interventions
- Dental Implants in Posterior Mandible
- Subperiosteal 1:100.000 Articaine 4% epinephrine
- Loco-regional 1:100.000 Articaine 4% epinephrine
Primary outcomes
- Anesthesia efficiency — During Surgery for Dental Implant installation
Evaluate subperiosteal vs loco-regional anesthesia for implant installation in posterior mandible. It will be measured by the amount (mean) of anesthesia pre and intraoperatory
Countries
Portugal