Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT01962116: VERROU-REA

Citrate Versus Heparin for the Lock of Non-tunneled Hemodialysis Catheters in Patients Hospitalised in ICU

Completed Phase 3 Last updated 9 February 2026
What this trial tests

Phase 3 trial testing Citrate 4% in Patients With Acute Renal Insufficiency in 405 participants. Completed in 31 December 2016.

Timeline
14 June 2013
Primary endpoint
1 April 2016
31 December 2016

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
PhasePhase 3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingtriple
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment405
Start date14 June 2013
Primary completion1 April 2016
Estimated completion31 December 2016
Sites1 location across France

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Patients With Acute Renal Insufficiency. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

After obtaining written informed consent and inclusion, patients will be randomised into 2 groups for the type of dialysis catheter lock: * The first group will have a citrate lock * The second group will have a heparin lock Patients will be stratified according to the centre and type of Renal Replacement Therapy (RRT) continuous or intermittent. The daily surveillance of patients will not be different from the usual surveillance of patients on Renal Replacement Therapy. The hemodialysis catheters used will be specific Renal Replacement Therapy catheters. The decision to withdraw the catheter will be made by the investigator and based on clinical criteria (complications related to the catheter, termination of Renal Replacement Therapy…)

Publications & conference data

4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Trisodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a catheter lock for non-tunneled hemodialysis catheters in critically ill patients: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial.
    Quenot JP, Helms J, Bourredjem A, Dargent A, et al · · 2019 · cited 21× · PMID 31264073 · DOI 10.1186/s13613-019-0553-4
  2. Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.
    López-Briz E, Ruiz Garcia V, Cabello JB, Bort-Martí S, et al · · 2022 · cited 15× · PMID 35849083 · DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008462.pub4
  3. Quasi-experimental study of sodium citrate locks and the risk of acute hemodialysis catheter infection among critically ill patients.
    Parienti JJ, Deryckère S, Mégarbane B, Valette X, et al · · 2014 · cited 13× · PMID 24982071 · DOI 10.1128/aac.03079-14
  4. Comparison of heparin to citrate as a catheter locking solution for non-tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheters in patients requiring renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure (VERROU-REA study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Bruyère R, Soudry-Faure A, Capellier G, Binquet C, et al · · 2014 · cited 6× · PMID 25409678 · DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-449

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Citrate 4%

Trials testing the same drug.

Other Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01962116.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing