Adults 1 to 20, any sex, with Sickle Cell Disease. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants With Successful Pain Interventions by Arm Between Presentation and 3 Hours Post Administration of Study DrugPrimary· Baseline and 3 hours (±30 minutes) post administration of study drug. The 3-hour pain assessment time-period was extended for subjects that were sleep until the first available measurement.
Pain scales used are the numerical rating system, the Faces Pain Scale, and the Faces, Legs, Arms, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) pain scale (for patients 7 years or older, ages 4-6 years, or less than 4 years, respectively). For each patient, if the reduction of the pain scores (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain) between presentation to the acute care setting and 3 hours post administration of study drug is 33% or greater, then this patient will be defined as having a successful intervention. The proportions of successful interventions in the gabapentin and placebo groups will be estimated
No
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
13
Placebo
17
Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
27
Placebo
25
Morphine Equivalent Doses Administered From Presentation to 3-hours Post Treatment With Gabapentin/PlaceboSecondary· The 3-hour pain assessment was the pain assessment closest in time to the 3-hour time and was typically within 30 minutes of target. The time period was extended for 12 patients that were sleeping.
The equivalent dose of morphine in mg
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
0.12
0.09 – 0.22
Placebo
0.13
0.09 – 0.22
Number of Participants With Successful Pain Interventions by Arm Between Presentation and Point of Decision for Either Hospital Admission or Discharge to HomeSecondary· From time of presentation to the acute care setting until time of either discharge to home or admission to the hospital, up to 8 hours.
For each patient, if the reduction of the pain scores (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain) between presentation to the acute care setting and Point of decision for either hospital admission or discharge to home is 33% or greater, then this patient will be defined as having a successful intervention.
No
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
10
Placebo
17
Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
30
Placebo
27
Morphine Equivalent Doses Administered From Presentation to the Point of Decision for Either Admission or Discharge to HomeSecondary· From time of presentation to the acute care setting until time of either discharge to home or admission to the hospital, up to 8 hours.
To compare the total morphine equivalent dose (mg/kg) used to control pain during VOC between presentation to the acute care setting and the point of decision for either admission or discharge to home, in the gabapentin and placebo groups.
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
0.13
0.10 – 0.25
Placebo
0.13
0.09 – 0.25
Hospital AdmissionSecondary· From time of presentation to the acute care setting until time of either discharge to home or admission to the hospital, up to 8 hours.
To compare the rate of admission related to pain management, in the gabapentin vs. placebo groups. (Outcome: binary response - admitted or discharged)
No
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
32
Placebo
32
Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
10
Placebo
12
Absolute Change in Pain From Study Drug to 3 Hours Post Administration of Study DrugSecondary· Study drug administration to 3-hours post study drug administration
To compare the change in pain score from time of administration of study drug to assessment at 3 hours post administration of study drug in the gabapentin vs. placebo groups. (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain)
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
0
0 – 2
Placebo
0.5
0 – 2
Absolute Change in Pain, Study Drug to Hospital Discharge DecisionSecondary· From time of presentation to the acute care setting until time of either discharge to home or admission to the hospital, up to 8 hours.
To compare the change in pain score from time of administration of study drug to the point of decision for either admission or discharge to home, in the gabapentin and placebo groups. (0=no pain and 10=worst possible pain)
Group
Value
95% CI
Gabapentin
1.0
0.0 – 3.0
Placebo
0.5
0.0 – 2.0
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Adverse events were evaluated by one phone contact within the following 72 hours..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Gabapentin
Serious: 0/42 (0%)
Deaths: 0/42
Placebo
Serious: 0/44 (0%)
Deaths: 0/44
Other adverse events (7 terms — click to expand)
Reaction
System
Gabapentin
Placebo
Vomiting
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
Dizziness
Nervous system disorders
—
—
Fatigue
General disorders
—
—
Headache
General disorders
—
—
Pruritus
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
—
—
Pneumonitis
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
—
—
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders - Other
This is a phase II double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of gabapentin when added to standard pain management for patients with sickle cell disease experiencing acute pain crisis in the ambulatory care setting.
Sickle cell pain is different for every patient. Some patients get complete relief from routine pain medicines, and others need more time or more doses of pain medicines before the pain goes away completely. It is known that humans have many types of pain, including something called neuropathic pain. Neuropathic pain in other conditions (such as diabetes) has been treated successfully with a medicine called gabapentin. The investigators in this study suspect that some sickle cell pain is a combination of pain types. They would like to see if adding gabapentin to the usual pain medicines makes pain go away faster or more completely.
Primary Objective:
* To assess the analgesic efficacy of gabapentin vs. placebo for pain during vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) in participants with sickle cell disease (SCD). A response to study drug will be defined by a decrease in pain score of ≥ 33% between presentation to the acute care setting and assessment at 3 hours post administration of study drug.
Secondary Objective:
* To compare the total morphine equivalent dose (mg/kg) used to control pain during VOC between presentation to the acute care setting and assessment at 3 hours post administration of study drug in the gabapentin vs. placebo groups.
Publications & conference data
5 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07047040 — Analgesic Efficacy of Pre-operative Dose of Ketorolac and Gabapentin
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07131527 — Comparison Between Oral Gabapentin Versus Diclofenac Sodium in Post-operative Analgesia Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
· NA
· recruiting
NCT04613024 — Beneficial Side Effects of Topiramate in Obese Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty
· EARLY_PHASE1
· withdrawn
NCT07389551 — Comparison of Pregabalin Versus Gabapentin as Pre-emptive Analgesic
· NA
· completed
NCT06992427 — High-dose Prophylactic Gabapentin (HOPE) vs. Placebo to Prevent Opioid Use for Oral Mucositis Pain During Concurrent Che
· Phase 3
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Sickle Cell Disease
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07369024 — Sub-dissociative Dose Ketamine in Treatment of Vaso-occlusive Pain Event in Children and Young Adults
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06016634 — Alendronate for Osteonecrosis in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06260891 — Zinc Supplementation in Sickle Cell Disease: A Precursor to the Think Zinc for Bones Trial
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07222475 — Writing Relaxing Beats in Adolescents Who Have Sickle Cell Disease
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07224360 — Safety of Anumigilimab (CSL324) in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease (SCD)
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other St. Jude Children's Research Hospital trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07222735 — Hypofractionated Radiation in Combination With B7-H3-CAR T Cells for Pediatric Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Sarcoma
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07085338 — A Phase II Study With a Safety Run-In of the Addition of N-803 to a Chemoimmunotherapy Backbone for the Treatment of Pat
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT05664113 — Feasibility, Safety, and Potential Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) for Gastrointestinal Dysfunction i
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT06993688 — Revealing Information Genuinely & Honestly Across Time - Communication Preferences Visit
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06326463 — CAR T-cell Therapy Directed to CD70 for Pediatric Patients With Hematological Malignancies
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Last refreshed: 2 April 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01954927.