Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT01898598

A Study of Vismodegib With Surgery in Participants With Previously Untreated Basal Cell Carcinoma

Terminated Phase 2 Results posted Last updated 8 May 2017
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing Placebo in Basal Cell Carcinoma in 18 participants. Terminated before completion.

Timeline
23 January 2014
Primary endpoint
26 January 2016
26 January 2016

Quick facts

Lead sponsorHoffmann-La Roche
PhasePhase 2
StatusTerminated
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingdouble
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment18
Start date23 January 2014
Primary completion26 January 2016
Estimated completion26 January 2016
Sites21 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Basal Cell Carcinoma. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Percent Change in Target Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC) Expected Surgical Defect Area at Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) Visit Primary · Baseline, MMS visit (Week 12-14)

The percent change in target BCC expected surgical defect area was defined as (\[baseline expected surgical defect area - expected surgical defect area at MMS visit\]/ baseline expected surgical defect area) × 100 percent (%) where expected surgical defect area was manually outlined on a digital photograph and measured by a computer (computer aided planimetry). MMS visit was defined as the visit that occurred within 2 weeks of the last study treatment.

GroupValue95% CI
Vismodegib31.52± 35.580
Placebo46.30± 20.232
Actual Change in Target BCC Expected Surgical Defect Area at MMS Visit Secondary · Baseline, MSS Visit (Week 12-14)

Actual change was defined as (baseline expected surgical defect area - expected surgical defect area at MMS visit). MMS visit was defined as the visit that occurred within 2 weeks of the last study treatment. Expected surgical defect area was manually outlined on a digital photograph and measured by a computer (computer aided planimetry).

GroupValue95% CI
Vismodegib70.16± 82.483
Placebo93.33± 35.768
Percentage Change in Target BCC Actual Tumor-Free Margin Excision Area at MMS Visit Secondary · Baseline, MMS visit (Week 12-14)

Percent change in target BCC actual tumor-free margin excision area was defined as = (expected surgical defect area pre-treatment - actual tumor-free margin excision area at MMS visit) / expected surgical defect area pre-treatment) \* 100%. The actual tumor-free margin excision area (includes 2 millimeters \[mm\] margin) was measured during MMS. The area was photographed and traced on the digital photograph then calculated by computer-aided planimetry. MMS visit was defined as the visit that occurred within 2 weeks of the last study treatment.

GroupValue95% CI
Vismodegib-12.24± 78.775
Placebo25.29± 65.763
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Secondary · MMS visit (Week 12-14)

Clinical response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at the post-treatment MMS excision. CR was defined as no histological evidence of BCC. PR was defined as a reduction of at least 50 % in the expected surgical defect area with histologic evidence of residual BCC. MMS visit was defined the visit that occurred within 2 weeks of the last study treatment.

GroupValue95% CI
Vismodegib18.22.3 – 51.8
Placebo40.05.3 – 85.3
Percentage of Participants With Skip Area Secondary · MMS visit (Week 12-14)

Skip area was defined as the presence of non-contiguous residual tumor at the MMS visit, as determined by an independent dermatopathologist. MMS visit occurred within 2 weeks of the last study treatment.

GroupValue95% CI
Vismodegib0.00.0 – 28.5
Placebo40.05.3 – 85.3

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Baseline up to 52 weeks after last study treatment (Last Study Treatment = Week 12). Reporting threshold: 0%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Vismodegib
Serious: 3/11 (27%)
Deaths:
Placebo
Serious: 0/5 (0%)
Deaths:

Serious adverse events (4 terms)

ReactionSystemVismodegibPlacebo
Gastric ulcerGastrointestinal disorders
OesophagitisGastrointestinal disorders
Bladder neoplasmNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Malignant melanomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Other adverse events (22 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemVismodegibPlacebo
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DysgeusiaNervous system disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
AlopeciaSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
Influenza like illnessGeneral disorders
BronchitisInfections and infestations
LacerationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
AgeusiaNervous system disorders
Nerve compressionNervous system disorders
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders
Confusional statePsychiatric disorders
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Skin ulcerSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
HypertensionVascular disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Gastric ulcer, Oesophagitis, Bladder neoplasm, Malignant melanoma.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01898598 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will assess the efficacy and safety of vismodegib with surgery in participants with basal cell carcinoma.

Publications & conference data

7 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Targeting the Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Pathway: Review of Smoothened and GLI Inhibitors.
    Rimkus TK, Carpenter RL, Qasem S, Chan M, et al · · 2016 · cited 411× · PMID 26891329 · DOI 10.3390/cancers8020022
  2. Hedgehog Signaling: From Basic Biology to Cancer Therapy.
    Wu F, Zhang Y, Sun B, McMahon AP, et al · · 2017 · cited 243× · PMID 28286127 · DOI 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.02.010
  3. Hedgehog Signaling in Cancer: A Prospective Therapeutic Target for Eradicating Cancer Stem Cells.
    Sari IN, Phi LTH, Jun N, Wijaya YT, et al · · 2018 · cited 155× · PMID 30423843 · DOI 10.3390/cells7110208
  4. Strategies for modern biomarker and drug development in oncology.
    Smith AD, Roda D, Yap TA. · · 2014 · cited 89× · PMID 25277503 · DOI 10.1186/s13045-014-0070-8
  5. Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors as Targeted Cancer Therapy and Strategies to Overcome Drug Resistance.
    Nguyen NM, Cho J. · · 2022 · cited 88× · PMID 35163655 · DOI 10.3390/ijms23031733
  6. The role of Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathway in cancer.
    Xia R, Xu M, Yang J, Ma X. · · 2022 · cited 39× · PMID 36517618 · DOI 10.1186/s43556-022-00099-8
  7. Advanced basal cell carcinoma, the hedgehog pathway, and treatment options - role of smoothened inhibitors.
    Fecher LA, Sharfman WH. · · 2015 · cited 23× · PMID 26604681 · DOI 10.2147/btt.s54179

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Vismodegib

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Basal Cell Carcinoma

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Hoffmann-La Roche trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01898598.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing