Last reviewed · How we verify
A Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Automated Closed-loop Glucose Control in Insulin Treated Type 2 Diabetes (Phase 1), Inpatient Hyperglycaemia Requiring Subcutaneous Insulin Therapy (Phase 2 and Phase 3) and to Evaluate Use of Closed-loop Applying Faster Insulin Aspart Versus Standard Insulin Aspart (Phase 4) (ANGIE02)
The study assesses the efficacy and safety of closed-loop glucose control in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. Phase 1 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control combined with once daily basal insulin injection over 72 hours in hospitalised insulin treated T2D subjects. Phase 2 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control up to maximum 15 days in hospitalised insulin treated T2D subjects. Phase 3 The study objective is to compare conventional insulin therapy with closed-loop glucose control applying faster insulin aspart up to maximum 15 days in insulin-treated inpatients receiving parenteral and/or enteral nutrition. Phase 4 The study objective is to compare automated closed-loop control using faster acting insulin aspart with closed-loop control using standard insulin aspart.
Details
| Lead sponsor | University of Cambridge |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 43 |
| Start date | 2016-08 |
| Completion | 2018-09-21 |
Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
Interventions
- Fully Automated Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery
- Conventional insulin therapy
Primary outcomes
- Time spent in target glucose range (5.6-10.0mmol/l) — Phase 1 (Pilot study) = 72-hours, Phase 2 (Follow-up study) = Up to 15 days
Primary outcome will be measured using continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CGM) data (Phase 1-3) and plasma (Phase 4).
Countries
Switzerland, United Kingdom