Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT01766037: PATHWAY

Pivotal Aspiration Therapy With Adjusted Lifestyle Therapy Study

Completed NA Results posted Last updated 27 January 2020
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Aspiration Therapy (AspireAssist) in Obesity in 171 participants. Completed in 30 March 2019.

Timeline
13 November 2012
Primary endpoint
24 June 2015
30 March 2019

Quick facts

Lead sponsorAspire Bariatrics, Inc.
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment171
Start date13 November 2012
Primary completion24 June 2015
Estimated completion30 March 2019
Sites10 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Aspire Bariatrics, Inc.

Who can join

Adults 21 to 65, any sex, with Obesity. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Mean Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL) Primary · 52 weeks

The first effectiveness co-primary endpoint is the mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 52-weeks. The hypothesis for the first primary effectiveness endpoint is that the difference in the mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 52-weeks for the Aspiration Therapy (AT) group and Control group is at least 10%. Percent EWL is defined as absolute weight loss divided by baseline excess weight and multiplied by 100. Excess weight is determined from ideal body weights based on a BMI=25 kg/m2.

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy31.5± 26.7
Lifestyle Therapy9.8± 15.5
% of Subjects Who Achieve >25% EWL Primary · 52 weeks

The second co-primary effectiveness endpoint is that at least 50% of the AT group at 52-weeks achieve \> 25% EWL.

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy56.849.0 – 64.5
Lifestyle Therapy22.015.3 – 28.1
Mean Percent Total Body Weight Loss Secondary · 52 weeks

i) Mean percent absolute weight loss in AT compared to Control group

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy12.1± 9.6
Lifestyle Therapy3.6± 6.0
Percent of Subjects With ≥10% Total Body Weight Loss Secondary · 52 weeks

ii) proportion of subjects who achieve ≥10% absolute weight loss in AT compared to Control group

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy58.650.3 – 66.6
Lifestyle Therapy11.95.7 – 21.1
Mean Percent Change in Serum Lipids Secondary · 52 weeks

iii) mean percent change serum lipids (triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol concentration) in the AT group compared to the control group

High Density Lipoprotein
GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy8.14.2 – 12.0
Lifestyle Therapy1.7-3.8 – 7.2
Low Density Lipoprotein
GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy-4.2-8.5 – 0.1
Lifestyle Therapy-1.8-8.8 – 5.2
Triglycerides
GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy-9.9-17.7 – -2.0
Lifestyle Therapy0.1-15.9 – 16.1
Mean Percent Change in Blood Pressure Secondary · 52 weeks

iv) mean percent change in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the AT group compared to the control group

Systolic Pressure
GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy-1.2-4.0 – 1.5
Lifestyle Therapy-2.5-5.9 – 0.9
Diastolic Pressure
GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy-2.6-5.2 – 0.1
Lifestyle Therapy0.5-4.1 – 5.2
Mean Change in Score for IWQOL Questionnaire Secondary · 52 weeks

v) "Impact of Weight on Quality of Life" (IWQOL) questionnaire total score Total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. Based on the algorithm developed by Crosby, et.al., patients' IWQOLLite total scores are considered to have shown meaningful improvement from baseline to one year if they increased between 7 and 12 points, depending upon baseline severity in comparison to the normative mean. Normative means for the IWQOL-Lite have been derived from a sample of 534 non-obese individuals who were not enrolled in any weight loss treatment program \[238 women and 296 men with BMI'

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy16.312.5 – 20.1
Lifestyle Therapy11.75.5 – 17.9
Mean Change in Hemoglobin A1C Secondary · 52 weeks

vi) change in mean hemoglobin A1C (only subjects with T2 diabetes at baseline). Hemoglobin A1C is measured as DCCT%. The change in mean DCCT% from Baseline to Week 52 is reported for this secondary endpoint.

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy-2.3-3.7 – -0.9
Lifestyle Therapy-0.37-0.77 – -0.03
Procedural Success Secondary · 52 weeks

vii) percent procedural success (defined as successful endoscopic placement of the A-Tube) in all subjects undergoing endoscopy

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy99
Change in Medication for Hypertension Secondary · 52 weeks

Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for hypertension

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy-53.5
Lifestyle Therapy-9.4
Change in Medications for Dyslipidemia Secondary · 52 weeks

Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for dyslipidemia

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy-23.1
Lifestyle Therapy-7.7
Change in Medications for Type 2 Diabetes Secondary · 52 weeks

Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for Type 2 Diabetes

GroupValue95% CI
Aspiration Therapy-33.0
Lifestyle Therapy-14.3

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: 52 weeks. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Aspiration Therapy
Serious: 4/111 (4%)
Deaths:
Lifestyle Therapy
Serious: 0/60 (0%)
Deaths:

Serious adverse events (4 terms)

ReactionSystemAspiration TherapyLifestyle Therapy
PeritonitisSurgical and medical procedures
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders
Prepyloric UlcerationGastrointestinal disorders
A-Tube ReplacementSurgical and medical procedures
Other adverse events (8 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemAspiration TherapyLifestyle Therapy
Granulation TissueSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Abdominal Pain (post procedure)Gastrointestinal disorders
Peristomal DischargeSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nausea / VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal DiscomfortGastrointestinal disorders
Peristomal InfectionInfections and infestations
Abdominal Pain (after 4 weeks)Gastrointestinal disorders
Change in Bowel HabitsGastrointestinal disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Peritonitis, Abdominal Pain, Prepyloric Ulceration, A-Tube Replacement.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01766037 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

This research study is being performed to find out if a new device, AspireAssist Aspiration Therapy System, can help people with obesity to lose weight without causing too many side effects.

Publications & conference data

1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Percutaneous Gastrostomy Device for the Treatment of Class II and Class III Obesity: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Thompson CC, Abu Dayyeh BK, Kushner R, Sullivan S, et al · · 2017 · cited 103× · PMID 27922026 · DOI 10.1038/ajg.2016.500

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Obesity

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01766037.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing