Adults 21 to 65, any sex, with Obesity. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Mean Percent Excess Weight Loss (%EWL)Primary· 52 weeks
The first effectiveness co-primary endpoint is the mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 52-weeks. The hypothesis for the first primary effectiveness endpoint is that the difference in the mean percent excess weight loss (%EWL) at 52-weeks for the Aspiration Therapy (AT) group and Control group is at least 10%. Percent EWL is defined as absolute weight loss divided by baseline excess weight and multiplied by 100. Excess weight is determined from ideal body weights based on a BMI=25 kg/m2.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
31.5
± 26.7
Lifestyle Therapy
9.8
± 15.5
% of Subjects Who Achieve >25% EWLPrimary· 52 weeks
The second co-primary effectiveness endpoint is that at least 50% of the AT group at 52-weeks achieve \> 25% EWL.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
56.8
49.0 – 64.5
Lifestyle Therapy
22.0
15.3 – 28.1
Mean Percent Total Body Weight LossSecondary· 52 weeks
i) Mean percent absolute weight loss in AT compared to Control group
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
12.1
± 9.6
Lifestyle Therapy
3.6
± 6.0
Percent of Subjects With ≥10% Total Body Weight LossSecondary· 52 weeks
ii) proportion of subjects who achieve ≥10% absolute weight loss in AT compared to Control group
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
58.6
50.3 – 66.6
Lifestyle Therapy
11.9
5.7 – 21.1
Mean Percent Change in Serum LipidsSecondary· 52 weeks
iii) mean percent change serum lipids (triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol concentration) in the AT group compared to the control group
High Density Lipoprotein
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
8.1
4.2 – 12.0
Lifestyle Therapy
1.7
-3.8 – 7.2
Low Density Lipoprotein
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
-4.2
-8.5 – 0.1
Lifestyle Therapy
-1.8
-8.8 – 5.2
Triglycerides
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
-9.9
-17.7 – -2.0
Lifestyle Therapy
0.1
-15.9 – 16.1
Mean Percent Change in Blood PressureSecondary· 52 weeks
iv) mean percent change in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the AT group compared to the control group
Systolic Pressure
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
-1.2
-4.0 – 1.5
Lifestyle Therapy
-2.5
-5.9 – 0.9
Diastolic Pressure
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
-2.6
-5.2 – 0.1
Lifestyle Therapy
0.5
-4.1 – 5.2
Mean Change in Score for IWQOL QuestionnaireSecondary· 52 weeks
v) "Impact of Weight on Quality of Life" (IWQOL) questionnaire total score
Total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100. Based on the algorithm developed by Crosby, et.al., patients' IWQOLLite total scores are considered to have shown meaningful improvement from baseline to one year if they increased between 7 and 12 points, depending upon baseline severity in comparison to the normative mean. Normative means for the IWQOL-Lite have been derived from a sample of 534 non-obese individuals who were not enrolled in any weight loss treatment program \[238 women and 296 men with BMI'
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
16.3
12.5 – 20.1
Lifestyle Therapy
11.7
5.5 – 17.9
Mean Change in Hemoglobin A1CSecondary· 52 weeks
vi) change in mean hemoglobin A1C (only subjects with T2 diabetes at baseline). Hemoglobin A1C is measured as DCCT%. The change in mean DCCT% from Baseline to Week 52 is reported for this secondary endpoint.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
-2.3
-3.7 – -0.9
Lifestyle Therapy
-0.37
-0.77 – -0.03
Procedural SuccessSecondary· 52 weeks
vii) percent procedural success (defined as successful endoscopic placement of the A-Tube) in all subjects undergoing endoscopy
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
99
Change in Medication for HypertensionSecondary· 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for hypertension
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
-53.5
Lifestyle Therapy
-9.4
Change in Medications for DyslipidemiaSecondary· 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for dyslipidemia
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
-23.1
Lifestyle Therapy
-7.7
Change in Medications for Type 2 DiabetesSecondary· 52 weeks
Percent change in the number of medications taken by subjects for Type 2 Diabetes
Group
Value
95% CI
Aspiration Therapy
-33.0
Lifestyle Therapy
-14.3
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 52 weeks.
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
This research study is being performed to find out if a new device, AspireAssist Aspiration Therapy System, can help people with obesity to lose weight without causing too many side effects.
Publications & conference data
1 peer-reviewed publication reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07403604 — Effect of Insulin Lowering on Lipogenesis
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07509307 — AMAZE 6: A Research Study Investigating How Well the Medicine NNC0487-0111 Helps People With Excess Body Weight and Knee
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07272837 — Impact of Semaglutide (Ozempic/Wegovy®) on Heart and Muscle Mass
· recruiting
NCT07481630 — A Research Study Investigating How Well the Medicine NNC0487-0111 Helps People With Excess Body Weight and Knee Osteoart
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07527195 — Understanding the Effect of CagriSema, Cagrilintide, and Semaglutide on Muscle Health (Role of Amylin Signature in Muscl
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Aspire Bariatrics, Inc.
Last refreshed: 27 January 2020
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01766037.