Last reviewed · How we verify
Acceptability of Depo-subQ Provera 104 in Uniject Versus Intramuscular Depo-Provera Among HIV-positive Women and Family Planning Providers in Rakai, Uganda
The purpose of this study is to assess acceptability and side effects of a low-dose injectable contraceptive formulation which is delivered under the skin (subcutaneously), as compared with injectable contraception delivered into the muscle (intramuscularly) among adult HIV-positive women who attend mobile clinics for HIV care and wish to use injectable contraception. The investigators will also assess experiences experiences delivering these two types of injections among health care providers working within the HIV care clinics.
Details
| Lead sponsor | Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 356 |
| Start date | 2012-04 |
| Completion | 2013-03 |
Conditions
- Acceptability of Different Contraceptive Injection Types
Interventions
- DepoSubQ Provera 104 in Uniject
- Intramuscular DMPA
Primary outcomes
- Preferred injection method — 6 months
Preference for subcutaneous injection, intramuscular injection, or no preference between the two
Countries
Uganda