18 and older, male only, with Prostate Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Pathologic Complete Response RatePrimary· Day 180
Pathologic complete response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pathologic complete response. Pathologic complete response rate following triplet therapy (enzalutamide in combination with leuprolide and dutasteride) and enzalutamide alone when administered as neoadjuvant therapy for 180 days prior to prostatectomy in participants with localized prostate cancer. Pathologic complete response was defined as the absence of morphologically identifiable carcinoma in the prostatectomy specimen, as assessed by the local and central pathologist.
Local pathologist
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
8.7
1.1 – 28.0
Enzalutamide
0.0
0.0 – 13.7
Central pathologist
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
4.3
0.1 – 21.9
Enzalutamide
0.0
0.0 – 13.7
Percentage of Participants With Positive Surgical MarginsSecondary· Day 180
To determine the percentage of participants with positive surgical margins at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Surgical margin, also known as tumor free margin referred to the visible normal tissue or skin margin that was removed with the surgical excision of a tumor, growth, or malignancy. The margin was described as positive when the pathologist finds cancer cells at the edge of the tissue, suggesting that all of the cancer has not been removed.
Local pathologist
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
4.3
0.1 – 21.9
Enzalutamide
12.0
2.5 – 31.2
Central pathologist
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
21.7
7.5 – 43.7
Enzalutamide
16.0
4.5 – 36.1
Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Local ReviewSecondary· Day 180
To determine the percentage of participants with extracapsular extension at prostatectomy as assessed by the local pathologist. Extracapsular extension was defined as prostate cancer cells when extended into the prostate capsule or outer lining of the prostate gland.
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
26.1
10.2 – 48.4
Enzalutamide
36.0
18.0 – 57.5
Percentage of Participants With Extracapsular Extension: Central ReviewSecondary· Day 180
To determine the percentage of participants with extracapsular extension at prostatectomy as assessed by the central pathologist. Extracapsular extension was defined as prostate cancer cells when extended into the prostate capsule or outer lining of the prostate gland.
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
56.5
34.5 – 76.8
Enzalutamide
70.8
48.9 – 87.4
Percentage of Participants With Positive Seminal VesiclesSecondary· Day 180
To determine the percentage of participants with positive seminal vesicles at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Seminal vesicles or seminal glands, were defined as a pair of simple tubular glands located within the pelvis. They secrete fluid that partly composes the semen. Seminal vesicles with cancer cells in them were called positive seminal vesicles.
Local pathologist
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
30.4
13.2 – 52.9
Enzalutamide
36.0
18.0 – 57.5
Central pathologist
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
30.4
13.2 – 52.9
Enzalutamide
36.0
18.0 – 57.5
Percentage of Participants With Positive Lymph NodesSecondary· Day 180
To determine the percentage of participants with positive lymph nodes at prostatectomy as assessed by the local and central pathologist. Lymph nodes were small clumps of immune cells that act as filters for the lymphatic system. Lymph nodes with cancer cells in them were called positive lymph nodes.
Local pathologist
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
26.1
10.2 – 48.4
Enzalutamide
4.0
0.1 – 20.4
Central pathologist
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
26.1
10.2 – 48.4
Enzalutamide
4.0
0.1 – 20.4
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) NadirSecondary· Day 195
To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the lowest post baseline PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. The PSA nadir was the participant's lowest observed post baseline PSA value.
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
0.04
0.01 – 0.53
Enzalutamide
0.51
0.02 – 8.80
Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) NadirSecondary· Day 195
To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the time to the lowest post baseline PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland. The PSA nadir was the participant's lowest observed post baseline PSA value.
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
5.09
2.79 – 6.44
Enzalutamide
6.01
2.89 – 6.64
Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)Secondary· Day 195
To determine the effects on PSA as measured by the percentage of participants with PSA less than (\<) 0.2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL), and a 50 percent (%) and 90% decrease in PSA value prior to prostatectomy. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was a protein produced by normal, as well as malignant, cells of the prostate gland.
PSA < 0.2 ng/mL
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
92.0
74.0 – 99.0
Enzalutamide
29.6
13.8 – 50.2
50% decrease in PSA
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
100.0
86.3 – 100.0
Enzalutamide
100.0
87.2 – 100.0
90% decrease in PSA
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
100.0
86.3 – 100.0
Enzalutamide
63.0
42.4 – 80.6
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Summary ScoreSecondary· Day 180
EPIC sexual domain was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's sexual function and sexual satisfaction. Sexual domain summary score was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) with higher scores representing better sexual function and satisfaction. Best change from baseline category in EPIC sexual domain summary score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable indicated changed by less than 1 minimally important difference and improved indicated increa
Worsened
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
11
Enzalutamide
10
Stable
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
4
Enzalutamide
6
Improved
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
1
Enzalutamide
0
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Function Subscale ScoreSecondary· Day 180
EPIC sexual function subscale was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's sexual function and sexual satisfaction. EPIC sexual function subscale was a component of sexual domain that was evaluated on a distinct set of questions. It was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) with higher scores representing better sexual function. Best change from baseline category in EPIC sexual function subscale score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable indicat
Worsened
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
11
Enzalutamide
12
Stable
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
4
Enzalutamide
5
Improved
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
0
Enzalutamide
0
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Number of Participants With Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Bother Subscale ScoreSecondary· Day 180
EPIC sexual bother subscale was HRQoL instrument that measured the effects of prostate cancer treatment on a participant's sexual function and sexual satisfaction. EPIC sexual bother subscale was a component of sexual domain that was evaluated on a distinct set of questions. It was measured on a scale ranged from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) with higher scores representing less sexual bother and difficulty. Best change from baseline category in EPIC sexual bother subscale score ranged from worsened to improved where worsened indicated decrease of at least 1 minimally important difference, stable in
Worsened
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
7
Enzalutamide
5
Stable
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
9
Enzalutamide
7
Improved
Group
Value
95% CI
Enzalutamide + Leuprolide + Dutasteride
0
Enzalutamide
4
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From baseline to 30 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 210 days..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
NCT07287150 — A Study to Test Inavolisib Treatment in Participants With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07226986 — A Phase Ib/II Open-label Study of AMO959 With Lutetium (177Lu) Vipivotide Tetraxetan (AAA617) in Combination With ARPI i
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07277270 — A Study of GSK5764227 in Combination With Standard of Care (SoC) or Other Agents in Participants With Advanced Solid Tum
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07028853 — This Study Will Explore Whether a Combination of the Investigational Drug Mevrometostat (PF-06821497) and Enzalutamide W
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT06922318 — The COSMYC Trial (COmbined Suppression of MYC)
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Prostate Cancer
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT06960798 — Characterizing the Genomic Landscape of Prostate Cancer in Native American Populations (NAT-Geno)
· recruiting
NCT07237269 — Abi/Pred + ADT vs ADT in PSMA-Positive, Conventionally Node-Negative Prostate Cancer
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07234981 — PSMA-PET Guided De-escalation of Salvage Radiation Treatment in Recurrent Prostate Cancer
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07027124 — Neoadjuvant ADT + Darolutamide With Pembrolizumab, Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Molecularly Stratified High-Ris
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07426094 — PRO-BOOST-N: Prostate-First Versus Combined Prostate and Nodal Dose Escalation in PSMA PET-Staged Node-Positive Prostate
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· recruiting
Other Pfizer trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT04982848 — Korea Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS) Study of Talzenna®
· not yet recruiting
NCT06873191 — A Study to Learn More About Tukysa Once it is Out in the Korean Market
· not yet recruiting
NCT07497854 — A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine NURTEC® ODT 75 mg After it is Released Into the Markets in Korea
· not yet recruiting
NCT06507904 — A Study to Learn How Different Preparations of Osivelotor Taste and Enter the Blood With Food or Liquids or With an Anta
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT06864585 — A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine - Zavicefta in Patients With Sepsis or Loss of Kidney Function in Japan
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Pfizer
Last refreshed: 23 October 2018
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01547299.