Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT01493414: JUMP

INC424 for Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis, Post Polycythemia Myelofibrosis or Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis.

Completed Phase 3 Results posted Last updated 26 April 2019
What this trial tests

Phase 3 trial testing INC424 in Myelofibrosis in 2,233 participants. Completed in 26 January 2017.

Timeline
16 August 2011
Primary endpoint
26 January 2017
26 January 2017

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNovartis Pharmaceuticals
PhasePhase 3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment2,233
Start date16 August 2011
Primary completion26 January 2017
Estimated completion26 January 2017
Sites273 locations across Italy, Colombia, Ireland, Poland, Tunisia, Russia, Belgium, Mexico

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Myelofibrosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to 5 Years Primary · Baseline up to approximately 5 years

An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant regardless of causal relationship to study drug and regardless whether study drug has been administered. A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria. A non-seriou

Adverse Events
GroupValue95% CI
INC4242153
Serious adverse events
GroupValue95% CI
INC424830
Percentage of Participants With at Least 50% Reduction in Spleen Length Secondary · Baseline up to approximately 5 years

Spleen length was assessed by manual palpation. Assessment of spleen response was repeated until early discontinuation of the study drug and also at study completion (28 days post end of treatment visit).

GroupValue95% CI
INC42471.769.7 – 73.7
Number of Participants With Best Overall Response (BOR) up to 5 Years According to Spleen Length Secondary · Baseline up to approximately 5 years

Overall response is analyzed using the spleen response, as assessed by the investigator and also by deriving the response using International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria. Participants with spleen length at baseline between 5 and 10 cm were reported as Responders if reporting non palpable spleen; Stable disease does not meet criteria for response or disease progression and Progressive disease with an increase of 100% from baseline in spleen length. Participants with spleen length at baseline more than 10 cm were reported as Responders w

Spleen length at baseline-Less than 5 cm
GroupValue95% CI
INC424 - RespondersNA
INC424 - Stable DiseaseNA
INC424 - Progressive DiseaseNA
INC424 - MissingNA
Spleen length at baseline-Between 5 and 10 cm
GroupValue95% CI
INC424 - Responders421
INC424 - Stable Disease334
INC424 - Progressive Disease1
INC424 - Missing9
Spleen length at baseline-More than 10 cm
GroupValue95% CI
INC424 - Responders742
INC424 - Stable Disease463
INC424 - Progressive Disease0
INC424 - Missing19
Change in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status From Baseline to Worst Post-baseline ECOG Status up to 5 Years Secondary · Baseline up to approximately 5 years

ECOG Performance Score has 5 grades. 0 = Fully active, able to carry out all pre-disease activities; 1 = Restricted in strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of light or sedentary nature; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out work activities. Active about 50% of waking hours; 3 = Capable of limited self-care, confined to bed/chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled; cannot carry on self-care. Totally confined to bed/chair. 5 = Death.

Baseline - Grade 0
GroupValue95% CI
INC424598
INC424377
INC42462
INC42412
Baseline - Grade 1
GroupValue95% CI
INC42489
INC424629
INC424187
INC42426
Baseline - Grade 2
GroupValue95% CI
INC4243
INC42443
INC424111
INC42420
Baseline - Grade 3
GroupValue95% CI
INC4240
INC4240
INC4240
INC4241
Baseline - Grade 4
GroupValue95% CI
INC4240
INC4240
INC4240
INC4240
Baseline - Missing
GroupValue95% CI
INC4241
INC4248
INC4244
INC4241
Change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-TOI, FACT-G) and FACT-Lymphoma (FACT-Lym) Total Scores Measured at Baseline and Week 48 Secondary · Baseline and Week 48

The FACT-Lym questionnaire consists of a total of 42 questions divided between five subscales (i.e., physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional well-being, functional well-being and lymphoma subscale). Each subscale questionnaire rates each question on a 5-point scale from 0 = Not at all to 4 = Very much. These scores were summed to three total sum scores, namely FACT-Lym score, FACT-Lym Trial Outcome Index (TOI), FACT-General (FACT-G) and FACT-Lym total score. Total scores: FACT-Lym=0-60, FACT-TOI=0-116, FACT-G total=0-108, FACT-Lym Total= 0-168. Higher scores are reflective of

FACT-Lymphoma Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
INC42442.3± 10.20
FACT-Lymphoma Week 48
GroupValue95% CI
INC42447.9± 8.47
FACT-Lymphoma TOI Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
INC42477.9± 18.99
FACT-Lymphoma TOI Week 48
GroupValue95% CI
INC42486.8± 16.42
FACT-Lymphoma total score Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
INC424113.9± 24.01
FACT-Lymphoma total score Week 48
GroupValue95% CI
INC424123.3± 22.34
FACT-G Baseline
GroupValue95% CI
INC42471.6± 15.98
FACT-G Week 48
GroupValue95% CI
INC42475.5± 15.59
Time to First Improvement in FACT-Lym, FACIT-Fatigue Score and ECOG Performance Status Secondary · Baseline up to approximately 5 years

Improvement was defined by the upper limit of the minimally important difference (MID). Patients with the best possible score at Baseline were excluded from this analysis because their HRQoL cannot be further improved. Responders and non-responders for each endpoint were defined based on change from baseline scores using pre specified cut-off points. Patients with an improved score compared to Baseline, for which the magnitude of the change was at least the cutoff value, were classified as responders; otherwise, as non-responders. The responder cutoff: ECOG cutoff=1, range=0 to 5, FACT-Lym cut

FACT-Lym Total score median time to improvement
GroupValue95% CI
INC42410.95.1 – 11.6
FACIT - Fatigue score median time to improvement
GroupValue95% CI
INC4244.64.4 – 4.6
ECOG score median time to improvement
GroupValue95% CI
INC42463.161.1 – 65.0
Medical Resource Utilization up to 5 Years Secondary · Baseline up to approximately 5 years.

Percentage of patients requiring medical resources (blood transfusions, hospitalization, emergency room visits, general practitioners or specialists consultations, urgent care or splenic irradiation) up to 5 years.

Baseline- Dependency
GroupValue95% CI
INC424129
INC42429
Baseline- Independency
GroupValue95% CI
INC424480
INC4241595

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Adverse Events (AEs) were collected up to 24-months after last patient first visit (LPFV), approximately 5 years .. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

INC424
Serious: 830/2233 (37%)
Deaths: 205/2233

Serious adverse events (565 terms)

ReactionSystemINC424
PneumoniaInfections and infestations
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
PyrexiaGeneral disorders
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
SepsisInfections and infestations
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders
Septic shockInfections and infestations
General physical health deteriorationGeneral disorders
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders
Acute myeloid leukaemiaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
AscitesGastrointestinal disorders
AstheniaGeneral disorders
Acute leukaemiaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Pleural effusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Other adverse events (24 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemINC424
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
AstheniaGeneral disorders
PyrexiaGeneral disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
Platelet count decreasedInvestigations
HeadacheNervous system disorders
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Weight increasedInvestigations
Alanine aminotransferase increasedInvestigations
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations

Most-reported serious reactions: Pneumonia, Anaemia, Pyrexia, Cardiac failure, Dyspnoea, Sepsis, Abdominal pain, Respiratory failure.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01493414 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The primary objective of this study was to collect additional safety of INC424 in patients with Primary Myelofibrosis, Post Polycythemia Myelofibrosis or Post-essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis, who either received prior treatment with commercially available agents or who have never received treatment.

Publications & conference data

8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in an open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase 3b expanded-access study in patients with myelofibrosis: a snapshot of 1144 patients in the JUMP trial.
    Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, le Coutre P, Waller CF, et al · · 2016 · cited 131× · PMID 27247324 · DOI 10.3324/haematol.2016.143677
  2. Primary analysis of JUMP, a phase 3b, expanded-access study evaluating the safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis, including those with low platelet counts.
    Al-Ali HK, Griesshammer M, Foltz L, Palumbo GA, et al · · 2020 · cited 92× · PMID 32017044 · DOI 10.1111/bjh.16462
  3. Baseline factors associated with response to ruxolitinib: an independent study on 408 patients with myelofibrosis.
    Palandri F, Palumbo GA, Bonifacio M, Tiribelli M, et al · · 2017 · cited 73× · PMID 29108288 · DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.18674
  4. Safety and efficacy of fedratinib, a selective oral inhibitor of Janus kinase-2 (JAK2), in patients with myelofibrosis and low pretreatment platelet counts.
    Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, et al · · 2022 · cited 30× · PMID 35476316 · DOI 10.1111/bjh.18207
  5. Analysis of predictors of response to ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in the phase 3b expanded-access JUMP study.
    Gupta V, Griesshammer M, Martino B, Foltz L, et al · · 2021 · cited 29× · PMID 33210570 · DOI 10.1080/10428194.2020.1845334
  6. Efficacy and tolerability of Janus kinase inhibitors in myelofibrosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Sureau L, Orvain C, Ianotto JC, Ugo V, et al · · 2021 · cited 26× · PMID 34315858 · DOI 10.1038/s41408-021-00526-z
  7. The role of allogeneic stem-cell transplant in myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors: a case-based review.
    Tiribelli M, Palandri F, Sant'Antonio E, Breccia M, et al · · 2020 · cited 18× · PMID 31534197 · DOI 10.1038/s41409-019-0683-1
  8. Association of Myelofibrosis Phenotypes with Clinical Manifestations, Molecular Profiles, and Treatments.
    Chifotides HT, Verstovsek S, Bose P. · · 2023 · cited 17× · PMID 37444441 · DOI 10.3390/cancers15133331

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of INC424

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Myelofibrosis

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Novartis Pharmaceuticals trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01493414.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing