Last reviewed · How we verify
A Phase 4 Randomized, Double-blind Study Comparing Patient Comfort and Safety Between Iodixanol 320 mg I/mL and Iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare overall patient comfort profile between the Iso-osmolar contrast media (IOCM), iodixanol 320 mg I/mL, and a Low-osmolar contrast media (LOCM), iopamidol 370 mg I/mL in patients undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) imaging of the abdomen/pelvis.
Details
| Lead sponsor | GE Healthcare |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 4 |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 304 |
| Start date | 2011-05 |
| Completion | 2012-02 |
Conditions
- Patient Comfort and Safety
Interventions
- Iodixanol
- Iopamidol
Primary outcomes
- Frequency of Subjects With Moderate/Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis. — Within 10 minutes post contrast administration
Number of subjects experiencing any moderate (score of 4 - 7) to severe (score 8 - 10) discomfort for cold or heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol. - Frequency of Subjects With Moderate / Severe Discomfort When Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic (CECT) Imaging of the Abdomen/Pelvis. — Within 10 minutes post contrast administration.
Number of subjects experiencing moderate (score of 4 -7) to severe (score of 8 - 10) discomfort for cold, heat or pain between Iodixanol and Iopamidol.
Countries
United States