Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT01294592: CONDUCT

Comparative Efficacy of Dutasteride Plus Tamulosin With Lifestyle Advice Versus Watchful Waiting Plus Lifestyle Advice in the Management of Treatment naïve Men With Moderately Symptomatic Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Enlargement

Completed Phase 4 Results posted Last updated 20 August 2018
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing Dutasteride plus tamsulosin in Prostatic Hyperplasia in 742 participants. Completed in 17 October 2013.

Timeline
22 December 2010
Primary endpoint
17 October 2013
17 October 2013

Quick facts

Lead sponsorGlaxoSmithKline
PhasePhase 4
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment742
Start date22 December 2010
Primary completion17 October 2013
Estimated completion17 October 2013
Sites80 locations across France, Italy, Netherlands, Greece, United Kingdom, Germany, Romania, Spain

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

GlaxoSmithKline — full company profile →

Who can join

50 and older, male only, with Prostatic Hyperplasia. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Change From Baseline in the Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) Approach Primary · Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

The IPSS questionnaire is a 7-item self-administered questionnaire designed to quantify the following urinary symptoms: Question 1 (Q1), incomplete emptying; Q2, frequency; Q3, intermittency; Q4, urgency; Q5, weak stream; Q6, straining; Q7, nocturia. It has an additional, independent eighth question to assess change in BPH-related health status (BHS) and quality of life. BHS scores range from 0 to 6, where 0 indicates "delighted" and 6 indicates "terrible." The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire quantitatively measure the level of urinary symptoms reported as a total IPSS. The total IPSS (sum o

Month 1, n=358, 367
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-3.2± 0.21
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-0.9± 0.20
Month 3, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-4.5± 0.22
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-2.4± 0.22
Month 6, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-4.6± 0.23
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-3.2± 0.22
Month 9, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-5.1± 0.22
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-3.6± 0.22
Month 12, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-5.2± 0.23
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-3.6± 0.23
Month 15, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-5.2± 0.25
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-3.6± 0.24
Month 18, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-5.1± 0.25
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-3.3± 0.25
Month 21, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-5.5± 0.25
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-3.6± 0.24
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in the Indicated Improvement Categories in the IPSS at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach Secondary · Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

Symptom improvement was assessed using IPSS categorical changes from Baseline. Change from Baseline categories were summarized by treatment group using five improvement levels: \>=1 point through \>=5 points. IPSS percent change from Baseline was summarized using seven improvement levels: \>0 percent, \>=10 percent, \>=20 percent, \>=25 percent, \>=30 percent, \>=40 percent, and \>=50 percent. Change in IPSS from Baseline was analysed using the LOCF method and is summarized for the following categories: \>=2 points, \>=3 points, and percent change \>=25. The 7 items in the IPSS questionnaire q

Month 1, >=2 points, n=358, 367
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin225
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No149
Month 1, >=3 points, n=358, 367
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin182
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No90
Month 1, >=25 percent, n=358, 367
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin161
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No76
Month 3, >=2 points, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin277
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No221
Month 3, >=3 points, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin233
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No172
Month 3, >=25 percent, n= 359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin218
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No150
Month 6, >=2 points, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin277
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No250
Month 6, >=3 points, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin245
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No208
Change From Baseline in the BPH Impact Index (BII) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach Secondary · Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

The BII is a 4-item questionnaire covering physical discomfort, worry, bother, and impact on usual activities, with a minimum score of 0 (best) and a maximum score (worst) of 13 points. Individual missing questionnaire responses were imputed, as applicable. Change from Baseline in the BII score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on

Month 1, n=357, 366
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.3± 0.11
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-0.4± 0.11
Month 3, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.8± 0.11
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.0± 0.11
Month 6, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.9± 0.11
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.3± 0.11
Month 9, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-2.1± 0.11
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.5± 0.11
Month 12, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-2.1± 0.12
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.5± 0.12
Month 15, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-2.2± 0.12
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.5± 0.12
Month 18, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-2.2± 0.12
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.4± 0.12
Month 21, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-2.4± 0.12
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.6± 0.12
Change From Baseline in the BPH-related Health Status (BHS) Score at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach Secondary · Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

Each participant was asked the following question "If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition just the way it is now, how would you feel about that?". This response was rated from 0 ("delighted") to 6 ("terrible"). Change from Baseline in the BHS score was summarized by treatment group using the LOCF approach at each scheduled post-Baseline assessment. LOCF analysis involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for a participant who discontinued from the study. Estimates are based on the adjusted m

Month 1, n=358, 367
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-0.8± 0.06
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-0.3± 0.05
Month 3, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.1± 0.06
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-0.7± 0.06
Month 6, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.2± 0.06
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-0.9± 0.06
Month 9, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.3± 0.06
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.0± 0.06
Month 12, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.3± 0.06
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.1± 0.06
Month 15, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.4± 0.06
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.1± 0.06
Month 18, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.4± 0.06
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.1± 0.06
Month 21, n=359, 368
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin-1.5± 0.06
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No-1.1± 0.06
Number of Events of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH Secondary · Up to 2 years

The number of participants with the first occurrence of clinical progression (CP) of BPH occurring on or after the randomization date are summarized by treatment and year. Time is based on the date of the first-occurring CP event, and is relative to the randomization date. CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom deterioration by IPSS \>=3 points from Baseline (Visit 2); acute urinary retention related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal ins

Year 1, n=369, 373
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin48
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No94
Year 2, n=276, 251
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin17
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No14
Number of Participants With the Indicated First-occurring Component of Clinical Progression (CP) of BPH Secondary · Up to Month 24

CP of BPH is a composite of five endpoints assessed through the end of the study, including: symptom progression (symptom deterioration by IPSS \>=3 points from Baseline \[Visit 2\]); acute urinary retention (AUR) related to BPH; incontinence (overflow or urge) related to BPH; recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) or urosepsis related to BPH; renal insufficiency related to BPH (a single \>=50% rise from Baseline serum creatinine and a total value \>=1.5 milligrams/deciliter). The number of participants with CP of BPH, the number of participants with the indicated first-occurring component of

Participants with CP of BPH, n=369, 373
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin65
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No108
BPH symptom progression, n=65, 108
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin59
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No97
BPH-related AUR, n=65, 108
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin2
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No4
BPH-related incontinence, n=65, 108
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin4
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No3
Recurrent BPH-related UTI, n=65, 108
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin0
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No4
BPH-related renal insufficiency, n=65, 108
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin0
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No0
Tied for first component, n=65, 108
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin0
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No0
Multiple components (2 components), n=65, 108
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin4
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No9
Number of Participants Who Had Any BPH-related Surgery, Who Had the Indicated Type of Surgery, Who Had 2 BPH-related Surgeries, and Who Had >=3 BPH-related Surgeries Secondary · Up to Month 24

BPH-related surgery was summarized for events occurring on or after the date of randomization. The number of participants who had any BPH-related surgery, the indicated type of surgery, and multiple surgeries was summarized by treatment. Type of surgery data (cystoscopy, transurethral resection of the prostate \[TURP\], and prostatectomy) are presented in terms of the first-occurring BPH-related surgery after randomization. It was possible for a single participant to have multiple surgeries.

Participants with any BPH-related surgery
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin6
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No3
Participants with cystoscopy
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin5
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No1
Participants with TURP
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin2
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No1
Participants with prostatectomy
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin0
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No1
Participants with 2 surgeries
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin1
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No0
Participants with >=3 surgeries
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin0
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No0
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 1 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach Secondary · Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 1 was: "Overall, how satisfied are you with the treatment and its effect on your urinary problems?" There were seven possible responses, including: "very satisfied," "satisfied," "somewhat satisfied," neutral," "somewhat dissatisfied," "dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied." Response categories were created by grouping together "very satisfied," "satisfied," and "somewhat satisfied" responses in

Baseline, Any Satisfaction, n=315, 328
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin119
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No122
Baseline, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=315, 328
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin196
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No206
Month 1, Any Satisfaction, n=358, 349
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin272
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No209
Month 1, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=358, 349
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin86
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No140
Month 3, Any Satisfaction, n= 359, 359
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin300
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No265
Month 3, Neutral/Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 359
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin59
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No94
Month 6, Any Satisfaction, n=359, 361
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin301
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No285
Month 6, Neutral /Any Dissatisfaction, n=359, 361
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin58
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No76
Number of Participants With the Indicated Responses to Question 2 of the Patient Perception of Study Treatment (PPST) Questionnaire at Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 Using the LOCF Approach Secondary · Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24

The PPST questionnaire consists of two questions (asked to determine how satisfied participants are with the treatment received) and was administered at Baseline and all post-Baseline visits. Question 2 was: "Would you ask your doctor for the treatment you received in this study?" There were three possible responses, including: "Yes," "No," and "Not sure." Response categories included "Yes" and "No or Not Sure," created by grouping together "No" and "Not sure." The LOCF method involves bringing forward the last non-missing post-Baseline assessment for a participant with missing data and/or for

Baseline, Yes, n=315, 328
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin109
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No103
Baseline, No or Not Sure, n=315, 328
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin206
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No225
Month 1, Yes, n=358, 347
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin224
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No166
Month 1, No or Not Sure, n=358, 347
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin134
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No181
Month 3, Yes, n=359, 357
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin232
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No207
Month 3, No or Not Sure, n=359, 357
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin127
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No150
Month 6, Yes, n=359, 360
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin232
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No227
Month 6, No or Not Sure, n=359, 360
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin127
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No133
Exposure to Study Drug Secondary · Up to 2 years

Study drug exposure (days) = treatment stop date - treatment start date + 1. Participants in the Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes subgroup could have been escalated to study drug at any time during the study. Therefore, it is possible that participants were exposed to tamsulosin for a shorter length of time than participants in the dutasteride plus tamsulosin group.

GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin639.8± 215.49
Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes566.3± 195.13
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Event (AE) or Serious Adverse Event (SAE) Starting Post-randomization Secondary · Up to 2 years

A post-randomization adverse event is defined as an event with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect. Medical or scienti

Any AE
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin190
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No119
Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes95
Any SAE
GroupValue95% CI
Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin38
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No25
Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes19

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse events (AEs) starting post-randomization (including events with an onset on or after the randomization date or with a missing onset date) were collected (up to 2 years).. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Dutasteride Plus Tamsulosin
Serious: 38/369 (10%)
Deaths:
Watchful Waiting All: Escalated Yes and No
Serious: 25/373 (7%)
Deaths:
Watchful Waiting Escalated=Yes
Serious: 19/229 (8%)
Deaths:

Serious adverse events (78 terms)

ReactionSystemDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Esca…Watchful Waiting Escalated…
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders
Respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations
CellulitisInfections and infestations
DiverticulitisInfections and infestations
Inguinal herniaGastrointestinal disorders
PresyncopeNervous system disorders
Colon cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
ProstatitisReproductive system and breast disorders
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders
Aortic valve stenosisCardiac disorders
Atrioventricular blockCardiac disorders
CardiomyopathyCardiac disorders
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders
TachycardiaCardiac disorders
TachyarrhythmiaCardiac disorders
Heart valve incompetenceCardiac disorders
ErysipelasInfections and infestations
Pilonidal cystInfections and infestations
PneumoniaInfections and infestations
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airwaysInfections and infestations
Infected cystInfections and infestations
Other adverse events (2 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemDutasteride Plus TamsulosinWatchful Waiting All: Esca…Watchful Waiting Escalated…
Erectile dysfunctionReproductive system and breast disorders
Retrograde ejaculationReproductive system and breast disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Atrial fibrillation, Respiratory tract infection, Cellulitis, Diverticulitis, Inguinal hernia, Presyncope, Colon cancer, Prostate cancer.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01294592 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

Study FDC114615 is a two year, multi-centre, randomised, open-label trial to assess the efficacy of Dutasteride plus tamsulosin when compared to the standard practice of watchful waiting, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin in treatment naive men with symptomatic benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Once consented, each subject will undergo screening procedures to ensure the prostate volume and post void residual are within eligible range. If all entry criteria are met, subjects will be randomised (1:1) to receive Dutasteride plus tamsulosin with lifestyle advice or watchful waiting, with lifestyle advice, with a defined escalation to tamsulosin. Escalation will be initiated when no improvement from baseline is scored using the International Prostate Symptom Score (version 2) (IPSS) questionnaire. After randomisation, the subjects return to site at one month, then every 13 weeks until two years of treatment is complete or they are withdrawn. Key assessments, such as Adverse Events (AE's) and concomitant medication monitoring and completion of the quality of life questionnaires are performed at each visit and the data recorded.

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Efficacy and safety of a fixed-dose combination of dutasteride and tamsulosin treatment (Duodart(®) ) compared with watchful waiting with initiation of tamsulosin therapy if symptoms do not improve, both provided with lifestyle advice, in the management of treatment-naïve men wit
    Roehrborn CG, Oyarzabal Perez I, Roos EP, Calomfirescu N, et al · · 2015 · cited 52× · PMID 25565364 · DOI 10.1111/bju.13033
  2. Can we use baseline characteristics to assess which men with moderately symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia at risk of progression will benefit from treatment? A post hoc analysis of data from the 2-year CONDUCT study.
    Roehrborn CG, Oyarzabal Perez I, Roos EP, Calomfirescu N, et al · · 2017 · cited 8× · PMID 27334136 · DOI 10.1007/s00345-016-1884-5

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Dutasteride plus tamsulosin

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Prostatic Hyperplasia

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other GlaxoSmithKline trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01294592.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing