Last reviewed · How we verify
A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind, Controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Security of Intrapleurally Alteplase vs Urokinase for the Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion and Pleural Empyema
1. Objectives: * Main objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrapleural alteplase vs urokinase in patients with complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema. * To evaluate the pleural and plasmatic levels of the fibrinolytic system markers after the treatment with alteplase vs urokinase * To evaluate the safety of alteplase in the treatment of complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema 2. Design: Multicentric, randomized, parallel, controlled and double blind 3. Main variable: Percentage of curation 4. Study population and number of patients: 204 patients with complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusions and empyema 5. Duration of the treatment: Three days (main variable), and optional three days (secondary variable)
Details
| Lead sponsor | Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 4 |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 204 |
| Start date | 2003-12 |
| Completion | 2010-12 |
Conditions
- Empyema, Pleural
- Pleural Effusion
- Pleural Diseases
Interventions
- Intrapleurally Alteplase vs Intrapleurally Urokinase
Primary outcomes
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrapleural alteplase vs urokinase in patients with complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema during one year of follow-up. — Evaluation at three and 6 days of treatment
It will be also an evaluation at one month, six months and one year
Countries
Spain