Evaluation of a New Anti-cancer Immunotherapy in Patients With Non-operable and Progressing Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma
CompletedPhase 1Results postedLast updated 9 October 2019
What this trial tests
Phase 1 trial testing GSK Biologicals' 2241658A Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic (ASCI) in Melanoma in 33 participants. Completed in 17 April 2018.
18 and older, any sex, with Melanoma. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Patients With Severe Toxicities During the Study Treatment PeriodPrimary· During the study treatment period (maximum duration = 49 months).
Severe toxicity was defined, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 4.0), as 1)an Antigen-Specific Cancer Immunotherapeutic (ASCI) related or possibly related Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Grade 3 myalgia, arthralgia, headache, fever, rigors/chills and fatigue (including lethargy, malaise and asthenia) should persist for 48 hours despite therapy to be taken into account and as 2)an ASCI related or possibly related Grade 2 or higher allergic reaction occurring within 24 hours of the dose administration.
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Number of Patients With the Best Overall Response in the Overall PopulationPrimary· During the study treatment period (maximum duration = 49 months).
Best response was recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression. Response assessment was essentially based on a set of measurable lesions (target lesions \[TL\]), and any other lesions (non-target lesions \[NTL\]), both identified at baseline. Complete Response (CR)=disappearance of all TL or NTL; Partial Response (PR) = at least 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of the longest diameter(LD) of TL compared to baseline, stable disease (SD) = neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for Progressive disease (PD) compared with baseline; PD = at
Best response, CR
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
3
Best response, PR
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
Best response, SD
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
Best response, SD/PR
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
Best response, PD
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
23
Best response, NE
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
1
Clinical Response, Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
5
Clinical Response, No
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
28
Number of Patients With Best Overall Response Including Mixed Response (MxR) and Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) CriteriaSecondary· During the study treatment period (maximum duration = 49 months).
Patients with Slow Progressive Disease (SPD) status met the following criteria: patient's Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0 or 1, patient's lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) value was not greater than twice the normal upper limit, there was no appearance of visceral metastases other than in the lung, patients did not meet any of the criteria for permanent stopping of study treatment. Mixed response (MxR) criteria was defined as follows: at least 30% decrease in the longest diameter (LD) occurring in at least one target lesion recorded and measured at baseline. Such r
CR
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
3
PR
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
SD/PR
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
MxR: SD with target lesion regression
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
MxR: PD with target lesion regression
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
3
MxR: PR with new lesion
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
SD without mixed response
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
PD with SPD criteria
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
10
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) by Maximum GradeSecondary· During the study treatment period (maximum duration = 49 months).
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient, temporally associated with the use of a medical product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e. lack efficacy), abuse or misuse.
Any event, Grade 1
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
9
Any event, Grade 2
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
21
Any event, Grade 3
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
3
Any event, Grade 4
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Any event, Grade 5
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs) That Are Causally Related to Treatment Administration by Maximum GradeSecondary· During the study treatment period (maximum duration = 49 months).
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient, temporally associated with the use of a medical product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e. lack efficacy), abuse or misuse.
Any event, Grade 1
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
20
Any event, Grade 2
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
13
Any event, Grade 3
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Any event, Grade 4
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Any event, Grade 5
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) by Maximum GradeSecondary· During the study treatment period (maximum duration = 49 months).
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study patient, is a grade 4 AE according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v 4.0), in addition, in this study, Grade 3 or higher pIMDs were considered as medically significant and were therefore notified as SAE.
Any event, Grade 1
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Any event, Grade 2
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
1
Any event, Grade 3
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
Any event, Grade 4
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Any event, Grade 5
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) That Are Causally Related to Treatment Administration by Maximum GradeSecondary· During the study treatment period (maximum duration = 49 months).
A serious adverse event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a study patient, is a grade 4 AE according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, v 4.0), in addition, in this study, Grade 3 or higher pIMDs will be considered as medically significant and will therefore be notified as SAE. No serious adverse events were reported during the study period that are causally
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)Secondary· From first treatment administration (i.e. at Week 0) until the last treatment administration (i.e. at Month 48)
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF) was defined as the time from first treatment until the date of the last treatment administration, for patients who discontinued the treatment prematurely, regardless of the reason for study treatment discontinuation. Patients who completed their full treatment phase or who were still on treatment at the time of analysis were censored on their last study treatment administration date..
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
4.7
3.3 – 11.7
Progression-free Survival (PFS) RateSecondary· From first treatment administration (i.e. at Week 0) until the last tumor evaluation (i.e. at Month 49)
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from first treatment to either the date of first disease progression (PD) or the date of death (for whatever reason), whichever came first. Patients alive and without disease progression were censored at the date of the last visit/contact.
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2.8
2.8 – 2.9
Overall Survival (OS)Secondary· From first treatment administration (i.e. at Week 0) until the last tumor evaluation (i.e. at Month 49)
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from first treatment until death. Patients alive at the time of analysis were censored at the time of last visit/contact.
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
NA
NA – NA
Number of Patients With Progression-free Survival EventsSecondary· From first treatment administration (i.e. at Week 0) until the last tumor evaluation (i.e. at Month 49)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of registration of the patient to either the date of disease progression or the date of death (for whatever reason), whichever came first. Patients alive and without disease progression were censored at the date of their last tumor evaluation. PFS events included progressive disease (PD), death in absence of PD and events (Any event which was part of the natural course of the disease under study, was captured as an efficacy measure. Therefore it did not need to be reported as an SAE).
PD, Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
29
PD, No
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
4
Death in absence of PD, Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Death in absence of PD, No
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
33
Events, Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
29
Events, No
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
4
Summary of Deaths Related to Progressive Disease of Cancer Under Study Reported After the Study Treatment, in the Period of Long-term Follow-up for SurvivalSecondary· During the long-term Follow-Up period for progressive disease and survival [1 year after the study treatment end (at Month 49) or up to 5 years after the first study treatment administration, regardless of disease progression and study discontinuation.]
Summary of deaths included death, autopsy performed and cause of death. Progression of the tumor was recorded in the clinical assessments. Death due to progressive disease was to be recorded on a specific form in the case report form but not as a serious adverse event (SAE). However, if the investigator considered that there was a causal relationship between the administration of the treatment or protocol design/procedures and the disease progression, then this must be reported as an SAE.
Death, Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
8
Death, No
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
25
Autopsy performed, Yes
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
0
Autopsy performed, No
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
6
Autopsy performed, Unknown
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
2
Cause of death, Disease under study (melanoma)
Group
Value
95% CI
NY-ESO 1 Group
8
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: AEs and SAEs were collected during the study treatment period, i.e. from Month 0 to Month 49 (maximum treatment duration) in the overall population. All-Cause Mortality events were collected during the long-term Follow-Up period for progressive disease and survival [1 year after the study treatment end (at Month 49) or up to 5 years after the first study treatment administration, regardless of disease progression and study discontinuation.].
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
NY-ESO 1 Group
Serious: 3/33 (9%)
Deaths: 8/33
Serious adverse events (4 terms)
Reaction
System
NY-ESO 1 Group
Anaemia
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
—
Postoperative wound infection
Infections and infestations
—
Back pain
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
Uterine cyst
Reproductive system and breast disorders
—
Other adverse events (102 terms — click to expand)
The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, immunogenicity and clinical activity of GSK2241658A antigen-specific cancer immunotherapeutic (ASCI) for the treatment of patients with non-operable and progressing metastatic cutaneous melanoma.
Publications & conference data
6 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07524114 — Study of High-Precision Evaluation of Molecular ResiduaL Disease Through a PlatfOrm for Cancer TracKing and Interception
· recruiting
NCT07224425 — A Study in People With Advanced Cancer (Solid Tumours) to Test Different Doses of BI 3810944 and to Find Out Whether it
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07285044 — The Cancer Connected Access and Remote Expertise Beyond Walls Program to Provide In-Home Cancer Treatment and Improve Tr
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07225036 — Promoting Immunotherapy Efficacy With Low-Dose Liver RT
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07379138 — Studying Quality of Life Inclusive of Mental Health and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Cancer Distress for the Improve
· NA
· recruiting
Other GlaxoSmithKline trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07569081 — A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Momelotinib in Participants With Vacuoles, E1-enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflam
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07406347 — A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Reactogenicity of an Investigational Pneumococcal Vaccine in Infants Receiving 3-dose
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07286266 — A Study to Investigate GSK5733584 Compared With Chemotherapy in Participants With Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer (BEH
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07286331 — A Study to Investigate GSK5733584 Compared With Chemotherapy in Participants With Recurrent Endometrial Cancer (BEHOLD-E
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07406334 — A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Reactogenicity of an Investigational Pneumococcal Vaccine in Toddlers 12 to 15 Months
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by GlaxoSmithKline
Last refreshed: 9 October 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01213472.