Last reviewed · How we verify
A Phase II, Randomized, Double Blind, 2-Way Crossover Safety and Efficacy Study of Subcutaneously Injected Prandial Insulins: Lispro-PH20 or Aspart-PH20 Compared to Insulin Lispro (Humalog®) in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
The purpose of the study was to compare Humalog (insulin lispro)-recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20) or Novolog (insulin aspart)-rHuPH20 to insulin lispro for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in basal-bolus therapy.
Details
| Lead sponsor | Halozyme Therapeutics |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 2 |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 132 |
| Start date | 2010-08 |
| Completion | 2011-08 |
Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type II
Interventions
- Insulin lispro
- Insulin aspart
- Recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20
- Insulin glulisine
- Insulin glargine
Primary outcomes
- Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) at the End of Each Treatment Period — Baseline, Week 12 and Week 24
Change in glycosylated hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) from baseline (Week 0) to end of treatment period (Week 12 and Week 24) is presented. Data are presented by combined treatment group (Lispro-recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (PH20) + Aspart-PH20 = Analog-PH20) and combined comparator drug (Insulin lispro from both groups). Least squares (LS) means were calculated from linear contrasts of mixed effects linear models with treatment (Lispro, Aspart), PH20 (yes, no), and treatment sequence as fixed effects and participant within treatment sequence as a random effect.
Countries
United States