Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT01150097

Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus in Liver Transplant Recipients

Completed Phase 3 Results posted Last updated 7 November 2018
What this trial tests

Phase 3 trial testing Tacrolimus (reduced tacrolimus) in Liver Transplant Recipient in 284 participants. Completed in 3 May 2013.

Timeline
31 March 2010
Primary endpoint
3 May 2013
3 May 2013

Quick facts

Lead sponsorNovartis Pharmaceuticals
PhasePhase 3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment284
Start date31 March 2010
Primary completion3 May 2013
Estimated completion3 May 2013
Sites57 locations across France, Colombia, Italy, Netherlands, Russia, Belgium, Sweden, Ireland

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 20 to 75, any sex, with Liver Transplant Recipient. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death Primary · from months 24 to 36

The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent)

GroupValue95% CI
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus2
Tacrolimus Elimination1
Tacrolimus Control3
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Treated Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (tBPAR ), Graft Loss or Death Primary · from months 36 to 48

The number of participants who experienced composite efficacy failure was analyzed. Composite efficacy failure was defined as treated biopsy proven acute rejection (tBPAR), graft loss, or death. A BPAR was defined as an acute rejection confirmed by biopsy with a Rejection Activity Index (RAI) score ≥ 3. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent)

GroupValue95% CI
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus1
Tacrolimus Elimination0
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death Primary · from months 24 to 36

The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.

GroupValue95% CI
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus2
Tacrolimus Elimination0
Tacrolimus Control1
Incidence Rate of Composite Efficacy Failure Defined as Graft Loss or Death Primary · from months 36 - 48

The number of participants who experienced graft loss or death was analyzed. The graft was presumed to be lost on the day the patient was newly listed for a liver graft, received a graft re-transplant, or died.

GroupValue95% CI
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus0
Tacrolimus Elimination0
Incidence Rate of tBPAR Secondary · from months 24 - 36

The number of participants who had a tBPAR was analyzed. tBPAR was defined as a BPAR which was treated with anti-rejection therapy. The RAI is used to score liver biopsies with acute rejection and is composed of 3 categories (portal inflammation, bile duct inflammation damage, and venous endothelial inflammation) each scored on a scale of 0 (absent) to 3 (severe) by a trained pathologist. The total RAI score = the sum of the scores of the 3 categories and ranges from 0 to 9, with a higher score indicating greater rejection.

GroupValue95% CI
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus0
Tacrolimus Elimination1
Tacrolimus Control2
Change in Renal Function Primary · from months 24 to 36

Change in renal function was assessed by the estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) using the abbreviated (4 variables) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) formula which was developed by the MDRD Study Group and has been validated in patients with chronic kidney disease. The MDRD-4 formula used for the eGFR calculation is: eGFR (mL/min/1.73m\^2) = 186.3\*(C\^-1.154)\*(A\^-0.203)\*G\*R, where C is the serum concentration of creatinine (mg/dL), A is age (years), G=0.742 when gender is female, otherwise G=1, R=1.21 when race is black, otherwise R=1.

GroupValue95% CI
Everolimus + Reduced Tacrolimus-0.9± 16.13
Tacrolimus Elimination2.5± 12.40
Tacrolimus Control-3.3± 11.84

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Reduced TAC, Month 36
Serious: 32/106 (30%)
Deaths:
TAC Elimination, Month 36
Serious: 16/51 (31%)
Deaths:
TAC Control, Month 36
Serious: 28/125 (22%)
Deaths:
Reduced RAD + TAC, Month 48
Serious: 34/106 (32%)
Deaths:
TAC Elimination, Month 48
Serious: 24/51 (47%)
Deaths:

Serious adverse events (121 terms)

ReactionSystemReduced TAC, Month 36TAC Elimination, Month 36TAC Control, Month 36Reduced RAD + TAC, Month 48TAC Elimination, Month 48
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
PyrexiaGeneral disorders
Incisional herniaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
PneumoniaInfections and infestations
Hernial eventrationGastrointestinal disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Impaired healingGeneral disorders
CellulitisInfections and infestations
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations
SepsisInfections and infestations
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
Ankle fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma of skinNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Haemolytic uraemic syndromeBlood and lymphatic system disorders
LymphadenopathyBlood and lymphatic system disorders
SplenomegalyBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders
Coronary artery stenosisCardiac disorders
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders
TachycardiaCardiac disorders
Abdominal adhesionsGastrointestinal disorders
Other adverse events (17 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemReduced TAC, Month 36TAC Elimination, Month 36TAC Control, Month 36Reduced RAD + TAC, Month 48TAC Elimination, Month 48
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
Renal failureRenal and urinary disorders
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
HypertensionVascular disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Incisional herniaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
HypercholesterolaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
Hepatitis CInfections and infestations
InfluenzaInfections and infestations
OsteoporosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Diarrhoea, Pyrexia, Incisional hernia, Pneumonia, Hernial eventration, Vomiting, Impaired healing, Cellulitis.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01150097 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The reason for this extension is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of two concentration-controlled everolimus regimen in de novo liver transplant recipients. The most important long-term safety assessments include evaluation of renal function, progression of HCV related allograft fibrosis, and other treatment related effects at Month 36 post-transplantation compared to extension baseline (Months 24 post-transplantation).

Publications & conference data

2 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. The Role of mTOR Inhibitors in Liver Transplantation: Reviewing the Evidence.
    Klintmalm GB, Nashan B. · · 2014 · cited 51× · PMID 24719752 · DOI 10.1155/2014/845438
  2. The role of everolimus in liver transplantation.
    Ganschow R, Pollok JM, Jankofsky M, Junge G. · · 2014 · cited 27× · PMID 25214801 · DOI 10.2147/ceg.s41780

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Liver Transplant Recipient

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Novartis Pharmaceuticals trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT01150097.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing