Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT00939666

Minimal Invasive Strategies for Good and Complete Response to Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer

Completed NA Last updated 24 March 2017
What this trial tests

NA trial testing Wait&see or TEM with intensive follow-up in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in 28 participants. Completed in 1 September 2014.

Timeline
1 July 2009
Primary endpoint
1 September 2014
1 September 2014

Quick facts

Lead sponsorMaastricht University Medical Center
PhaseNA
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationna
Designsingle group
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment28
Start date1 July 2009
Primary completion1 September 2014
Estimated completion1 September 2014
Sites2 locations across Netherlands

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Maastricht University Medical Center

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The high proportion of complete and good responders with modern chemoradiation and the improvement in magnetic resonance (MR)-imaging techniques have stimulated a renewed interest to the question whether in patients with complete or good response the overall benefits of a 'wait-and-see policy' or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) combined with intensive follow-up may outweigh the benefits associated with conventional surgery (total mesorectal excision (TME)or abdominoperineal resection (APR)). On the one hand, less invasive strategies will expose subjects to more diagnostic procedures and possibly a slightly higher risk of local failure and the need for salvage surgery. On the other hand, mortality and morbidity associated with radical surgery (e.g. anastomotic leakage, relaparotomy, wound and pelvic infection, chronic wound healing disturbances, abscess, colostomy, faecal or urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction) can be avoided. The investigators believe that wait-and-see policy for complete responders and TEM for good responders after chemoradiation is a feasible alternative to standard surgery, provided these patients are intensively followed.

Publications & conference data

3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Role of Local Excision for Suspected Regrowth in a Watch and Wait Strategy for Rectal Cancer.
    Geubels BM, Meyer VM, van Westreenen HL, Beets GL, et al · · 2022 · cited 12× · PMID 35804843 · DOI 10.3390/cancers14133071
  2. Selected stage IV rectal cancer patients managed by the watch-and-wait approach after pelvic radiotherapy: a good alternative to total mesorectal excision surgery?
    Custers PA, Hupkens BJP, Grotenhuis BA, Kuhlmann KFD, et al · · 2022 · cited 11× · PMID 35060263 · DOI 10.1111/codi.16034
  3. The use of deep learning on endoscopic images to assess the response of rectal cancer after chemoradiation.
    Haak HE, Gao X, Maas M, Waktola S, et al · · 2022 · cited 8× · PMID 34642794 · DOI 10.1007/s00464-021-08685-7

Verify or expand the search:

Other recruiting trials for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Maastricht University Medical Center trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00939666.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing