Adults 55 to 85, female only, with Low Bone Mineral Density or Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD at the Lumbar SpinePrimary· Baseline to 12 months
Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.1
-1.2 – 0.9
Alendronate
4.1
3.0 – 5.1
Teriparatide
7.1
6.1 – 8.2
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
5.4
4.3 – 6.4
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
5.4
4.4 – 6.5
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
9.1
8.0 – 10.2
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
5.5
4.4 – 6.6
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
11.3
10.3 – 12.4
Romosozumab Monthly
8.6
7.9 – 9.3
Romosozumab Every 3 Months
5.5
4.7 – 6.3
Romosozumab 140 mg
7.3
6.4 – 8.1
Romosozumab 210 mg
8.4
7.6 – 9.2
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD at the Lumbar SpineSecondary· Baseline to 6 months
Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.
Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
0.3
-0.7 – 1.3
Alendronate
2.6
1.6 – 3.6
Teriparatide
4.8
3.8 – 5.8
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
4.1
3.1 – 5.1
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
4.2
3.2 – 5.2
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
7.1
6.1 – 8.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
4.4
3.4 – 5.3
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
8.2
7.3 – 9.2
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Total HipSecondary· Baseline to 6 months
Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.
Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.6
-1.2 – -0.1
Alendronate
0.9
0.3 – 1.5
Teriparatide
0.5
-0.0 – 1.1
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
0.5
-0.1 – 1.1
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
0.9
0.3 – 1.5
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
2.2
1.7 – 2.8
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
1.1
0.6 – 1.7
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
2.9
2.3 – 3.4
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 6 in BMD of the Femoral NeckSecondary· Baseline to 6 months
Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.
Percent change from baseline to month 6 was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 6 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.4
-1.3 – 0.4
Alendronate
0.5
-0.3 – 1.4
Teriparatide
0.5
-0.3 – 1.3
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
0.2
-0.7 – 1.1
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
0.4
-0.4 – 1.3
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
2.1
1.3 – 3.0
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
0.9
0.1 – 1.7
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
1.9
1.0 – 2.7
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Total HipSecondary· Baseline to 12 months
Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.
Percent change from baseline to 12 months in BMD was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.7
-1.4 – -0.1
Alendronate
1.9
1.3 – 2.6
Teriparatide
1.3
0.7 – 2.0
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
1.3
0.6 – 2.0
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
1.3
0.7 – 2.0
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
3.4
2.7 – 4.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
1.9
1.3 – 2.6
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
4.1
3.5 – 4.8
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Femoral NeckSecondary· Baseline to 12 months
Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.
Percent change from baseline to 12 months in BMD was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the percent change from baseline to month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, and baseline BMD value, machine type, geographic region, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, visit, treatment (categorical) and interaction of treatment and visit as the independent variables.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-1.1
-2.0 – -0.2
Alendronate
1.2
0.3 – 2.1
Teriparatide
1.1
0.2 – 2.0
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
0.6
-0.3 – 1.6
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
1.8
0.9 – 2.7
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
4.2
3.3 – 5.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
1.4
0.5 – 2.3
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
3.7
2.8 – 4.6
Percent Change From Baseline at Month 12 in BMD of the Distal RadiusSecondary· Baseline to 12 months
Bone mineral density was measured using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Images were analyzed by a central imaging reader.
Percent change from baseline in distal radius BMD was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with the percent change from baseline to Month 12 in DXA BMD as dependent variable, baseline BMD value, machine type, interaction of baseline BMD and machine type, treatment (categorical) and geographic region as the independent class variables.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.9
-1.8 – 0.1
Alendronate
-0.3
-1.2 – 0.7
Teriparatide
-1.7
-2.7 – -0.7
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-1.8
-2.8 – -0.8
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-1.1
-2.1 – -0.2
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-1.0
-2.0 – -0.0
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-0.4
-1.3 – 0.5
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-1.2
-2.1 – -0.2
Percent Change From Baseline in Procollagen Type 1 N-telopeptide (P1NP)Secondary· Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) P1NP was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline.
Month 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-0.7
-8.7 – 8.1
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
24.2
14.1 – 35.3
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
61.4
48.6 – 75.3
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
55.0
42.2 – 69.0
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
75.8
61.8 – 90.9
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
92.2
76.6 – 109.1
Month 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-5.4
-13.6 – 3.6
Alendronate
-50.8
-55.1 – -46.2
Teriparatide
97.1
79.7 – 116.1
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-9.1
-17.1 – -0.2
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-15.5
-22.7 – -7.7
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
3.8
-5.4 – 13.9
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-19.5
-26.4 – -12.1
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
25.6
14.6 – 37.5
Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-5.9
-14.6 – 3.6
Alendronate
-57.0
-61.0 – -52.7
Teriparatide
138.0
115.7 – 162.6
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-20.0
-27.7 – -11.4
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-22.8
-29.9 – -15.0
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-18.6
-26.3 – -10.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-25.5
-32.2 – -18.1
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
6.9
-3.0 – 17.8
Month 9
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-10.6
-19.6 – -0.7
Alendronate
-60.8
-64.7 – -56.5
Teriparatide
116.8
95.1 – 140.9
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-26.9
-34.4 – -18.5
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-23.8
-31.4 – -15.4
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-26.1
-33.6 – -17.8
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-30.1
-36.8 – -22.6
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-5.8
-15.1 – 4.6
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-8.7
-17.9 – 1.5
Alendronate
-60.8
-64.7 – -56.4
Teriparatide
98.3
78.3 – 120.5
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-23.0
-31.0 – -14.0
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-23.3
-30.9 – -14.9
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-31.2
-38.2 – -23.4
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-29.7
-36.7 – -22.1
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-17.2
-25.4 – -8.1
Percent Change From Baseline in Type 1 Collagen C-telopeptide (CTX)Secondary· Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) CTX was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline.
Month 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-3.9
-12.1 – 5.1
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-22.1
-28.9 – -14.7
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-19.2
-26.0 – -11.7
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-35.4
-41.0 – -29.2
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-33.0
-38.6 – -26.8
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-28.5
-34.7 – -21.8
Month 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-2.4
-12.0 – 8.2
Alendronate
-65.0
-68.5 – -61.1
Teriparatide
69.4
52.6 – 88.0
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-21.5
-29.3 – -12.8
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-6.2
-15.2 – 3.8
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-26.5
-33.8 – -18.3
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-12.6
-21.0 – -3.4
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-3.7
-13.2 – 6.7
Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
2.7
-8.4 – 15.2
Alendronate
-64.2
-68.1 – -59.8
Teriparatide
93.5
72.3 – 117.4
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-18.1
-27.3 – -7.7
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-8.4
-18.3 – 2.7
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-24.6
-33.0 – -15.2
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-10.5
-20.0 – 0.0
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-8.7
-18.6 – 2.4
Month 9
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
1.0
-11.2 – 14.9
Alendronate
-64.4
-68.6 – -59.5
Teriparatide
81.3
59.4 – 106.2
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-15.1
-25.7 – -3.0
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
1.3
-10.8 – 15.1
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-27.7
-36.6 – -17.6
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-11.7
-22.0 – -0.1
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-17.2
-27.1 – -6.0
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
9.8
-3.9 – 25.4
Alendronate
-66.7
-70.8 – -62.0
Teriparatide
77.0
54.9 – 102.1
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-20.3
-30.6 – -8.6
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
12.2
-1.5 – 27.8
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-33.0
-41.4 – -23.3
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-6.6
-18.0 – 6.5
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-22.5
-32.0 – -11.7
Percent Change From Baseline in OsteocalcinSecondary· Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) osteocalcin was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline.
Month 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-1.6
-9.1 – 6.5
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
28.1
18.3 – 38.7
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
60.1
48.2 – 73.0
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
53.1
41.2 – 65.9
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
77.9
64.7 – 92.2
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
78.6
65.0 – 93.2
Month 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
4.1
-5.6 – 14.7
Alendronate
-28.7
-35.3 – -21.5
Teriparatide
104.7
85.5 – 125.9
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-0.3
-9.8 – 10.1
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-5.6
-14.2 – 3.8
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
15.6
4.7 – 27.7
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-3.7
-12.5 – 5.9
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
41.6
28.4 – 56.1
Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-7.1
-16.2 – 2.8
Alendronate
-40.6
-46.3 – -34.2
Teriparatide
106.7
86.5 – 129.1
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-11.8
-20.8 – -1.8
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-16.5
-24.5 – -7.6
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-7.4
-16.5 – 2.8
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-23.2
-30.5 – -15.3
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
10.0
-0.7 – 21.7
Month 9
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-6.0
-15.0 – 4.0
Alendronate
-50.9
-55.6 – -45.8
Teriparatide
99.9
80.8 – 121.0
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-26.9
-34.1 – -18.9
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-29.0
-35.8 – -21.6
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-27.7
-34.7 – -19.9
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-30.7
-37.1 – -23.7
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-4.0
-13.1 – 6.0
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-14.1
-22.0 – -5.4
Alendronate
-50.3
-54.8 – -45.4
Teriparatide
91.6
74.1 – 110.9
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-27.3
-34.1 – -19.6
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-24.7
-31.4 – -17.2
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-31.1
-37.5 – -24.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-26.2
-32.9 – -18.9
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
-12.5
-20.4 – -3.9
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone-specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BSAP)Secondary· Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12
Percent change from baseline in the bone turnover marker (BTM) BSAP was analyzed using a linear mixed effects model with the natural logarithm of the ratio of BTM (follow-up versus baseline) as the dependent variables, and visit, treatment (categorical), interaction of treatment and visit and the natural logarithm of the baseline BTM as the independent variables; outcomes were then transformed back to percent change from baseline.
Month 1
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-1.1
-6.7 – 4.9
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
11.7
5.2 – 18.5
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
35.1
27.5 – 43.1
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
29.3
21.8 – 37.3
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
47.5
39.3 – 56.2
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
60.9
51.7 – 70.7
Month 3
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-7.6
-14.3 – -0.3
Alendronate
-30.5
-35.5 – -25.0
Teriparatide
21.8
12.8 – 31.4
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-8.5
-15.3 – -1.1
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-18.0
-23.9 – -11.7
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
1.3
-6.2 – 9.4
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-17.3
-23.2 – -10.9
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
27.4
18.1 – 37.4
Month 6
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
-4.1
-12.1 – 4.5
Alendronate
-35.4
-40.8 – -29.7
Teriparatide
29.8
19.0 – 41.6
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-8.7
-16.6 – -0.1
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-18.2
-25.0 – -10.9
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-6.6
-14.5 – 2.0
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-20.0
-26.4 – -13.0
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
13.1
3.8 – 23.3
Month 9
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
3.5
-3.8 – 11.4
Alendronate
-32.5
-37.3 – -27.4
Teriparatide
41.8
31.7 – 52.6
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-4.9
-11.9 – 2.6
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-12.5
-18.7 – -5.9
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-5.5
-12.3 – 1.8
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-17.7
-23.3 – -11.7
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
10.4
2.7 – 18.8
Month 12
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo
9.2
1.7 – 17.2
Alendronate
-31.2
-35.9 – -26.2
Teriparatide
45.7
35.7 – 56.4
Romosozumab 70 mg QM
-2.6
-9.5 – 4.8
Romosozumab 140 mg Q3M
-10.8
-16.9 – -4.4
Romosozumab 140 mg QM
-5.0
-11.6 – 2.1
Romosozumab 210 mg Q3M
-12.4
-18.3 – -6.1
Romosozumab 210 mg QM
9.2
1.8 – 17.1
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Adverse events are reported by treatment phase: Romosozumab treatment phase (Baseline [BL] to month 12 and 24); Denosumab extension phase (months 24 to 36); Romosozumab retreatment phase (months 36 to 48); Follow-on phase (months 48 to 72)..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The primary objective was to determine the effect of treatment with romosozumab versus placebo at month 12 on the percent change from baseline in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine in postmenopausal women with low bone density.
Publications & conference data
8 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07216794 — Small Trial of Alendronate Impact on the Reservoir of HIV
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT06772792 — A Study to Evaluate the Drug-Drug Interaction Between Enlicitide Decanoate (MK-0616) and Alendronate in Healthy Adult Pa
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT06264609 — Precision Medicine Approach for Osteoporosis - Follow Up Study
· Phase 4
· enrolling by invitation
NCT06264401 — Treatment Exercises With Core Stability and Dynamic Resistance Exercise for Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis
· NA
· completed
NCT05645289 — Efficacy and Safety of Minodronate in Patients With Low Back Pain
· Phase 4
· unknown
Other Amgen trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07223190 — A Study Evaluating Subcutaneous Versus Intravenous Blinatumomab in Newly Diagnosed Adults With B-cell Precursor Acute Ly
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07493512 — Trial of Xaluritamig in Adults With Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07531095 — Study of Tarlatamab + ZL-1310 +/- Anti-programmed Death Ligand 1 (Anti-PD-L1) in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT06987539 — A Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of Inebilizumab in Children With Gen
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT05909761 — Observational Safety Study in Women With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) Exposed to UPLIZNA® During Pregn
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Amgen
Last refreshed: 22 September 2022
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00896532.