Adults 18 to 74, any sex, with Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percentage of Participants With Grade II-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Primary· 6 months
Acute GVHD is assessed by the 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading criteria. See Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995; 15:825-8., for grading criteria.
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
42
26 – 57
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
38
23 – 53
Percentage of Participants With Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (cGVHD)Primary· 2 years post transplant
Chronic GVHD is assessed by the 2005 Chronic GVHD Consensus Project. First the individual organ scoring is done, and then based on that the Global score is determined (mild-moderate-severe). See Citation: Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2005; 11:945-56., for grading criteria.
Moderate or Severe cGVHD
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
50
32 – 65
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
12
4 – 25
Severe cGVHD
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
28
14 – 43
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
5
1 – 15
Recovery of Naïve Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T CellsPrimary· Recipient recovery at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant
The percentage of C-C motif chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7)+CD45RA+ naïve T cells within the CD4 T cell populations was determined by flow cytometry.
6 mo (TMS=28; AC= 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
24
2 – 65
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
1
0 – 22
12 mo (TMS=25; AC= 21)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
22
5 – 48
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
7
0 – 42
24 mo (TMS=18; AC= 13)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
20
4 – 60
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
25
1 – 60
Recovery of Naïve Cluster of Differentiation 8 (CD8) T CellsPrimary· Recipient recovery at 6, 12 and 24 months post transplant
The percentage of CCR7+CD45RA+ naïve T cells within the CD4 and CD8 T cell populations was determined by flow cytometry.
6 mo (TMS=28; AC= 28)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
20
0 – 75
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
3
0 – 78
12 mo (TMS=25; AC= 21)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
17
7 – 79
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
6
0 – 79
24 mo (TMS=18; AC= 13)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
16
1 – 60
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
6
0 – 65
Changes in Cluster of Differentiation 4 (CD4) T Cell Receptor Vbeta RepertoirePrimary· Donor at time of collection and recipient at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post transplant
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from sorted CD4 and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) T cells and analyzed for Vbeta repertoire by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using Vbeta family specific primers and a labeled constant region primer (spectratyping). The receptor repertoire diversity was calculated from spectratyping data by creating a normal standard for repertoire diversity from healthy normal controls and assessing the divergence of individual patient's T cell receptor repertoire from these standard normal donor values. In this Vbeta repertoire divergence index, lowe
1 month
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
48
26 – 69
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
90
63 – 111
3 months
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
31
23 – 60
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
66
47 – 93
6 mo (TMS=7; AC= 9)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
35
21 – 57
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
75
32 – 93
12 mo (TMS=7; AC=9)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
30
23 – 81
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
67
25 – 92
Donor CD4 cells (TMS=8; AC=8)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
23
17 – 29
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
22
18 – 35
Changes in CD8 T Cell Receptor Vbeta RepertoirePrimary· Donor at time of collection and recipient at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post transplant
Ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from sorted CD4 and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) T cells and analyzed for Vbeta repertoire by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis using Vbeta family specific primers and a labeled constant region primer (spectratyping). The receptor repertoire diversity was calculated from spectratyping data by creating a normal standard for repertoire diversity from healthy normal controls and assessing the divergence of individual patient's T cell receptor repertoire from these standard normal donor values. In this Vbeta repertoire divergence index, lowe
1 month
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
62
42 – 91
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
78
53 – 111
3 months
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
54
35 – 64
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
81
52 – 88
6 mo (TMS=7; AC= 9)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
62
53 – 81
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
84
71 – 118
12 mo (TMS=7; AC= 9)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
55
39 – 108
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
89
58 – 110
Donor CD8 cells (TMS=8; AC= 8)
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
47
27 – 53
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
43
31 – 62
Percentage of Participants With Grade III-IV Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD)Secondary· 6 months
Acute GVHD is assessed by the 1994 Consensus Conference on acute GVHD Grading criteria. See Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, et al. 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995; 15:825-8., for grading criteria.
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
13
5 – 26
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
21
11 – 35
ToxicitiesSecondary· 103 months and 22 days
Here are the number of participants with adverse events. For a detailed list of adverse events, see the adverse event module.
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
43
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
42
Days to Engraftment of NeutrophilsSecondary· 2 years
Days to engraftment is defined as neutrophil recovery: designated by the first of 3 consecutive days with an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) above 500/mm(3).
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
11
3 – 19
B - Cyclosporine (AC Arm)
9
7 – 36
Days to Engraftment of PlateletsSecondary· 2 years
Platelet recovery: designated by the first of 7 days where the platelet count remains above 20,000/mm(3) without transfusion support
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
19
1 – 99
B - Cyclosporine (AC Arm)
14
1 – 431
Days to Engraftment of LymphocytesSecondary· 2 years
Lymphocyte recovery: designated by the first of 3 consecutive days with absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) above 500/mm(3).
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
16
1 – 194
B - Cyclosporine (AC Arm)
76
16 – 264
Overall SurvivalSecondary· Patients were followed for an average of up to 5 years.
Time between the first day of transplant to the day of death.
Group
Value
95% CI
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
41.7
26.7 – NA
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
18.8
10.4 – NA
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: 103 months and 22 days.
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexate, Sirolimus (TMS) Arm
Serious: 36/44 (82%)
Deaths: 8/44
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
Serious: 41/45 (91%)
Deaths: 19/45
Serious adverse events (143 terms)
Reaction
System
A - Tacrolimus, Methotrexa…
B - Cyclosporine (AC) Arm
Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neutrophils::Blood
Infections and infestations
—
—
Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neutrophils::Lung (pneumonia)
Infections and infestations
—
—
Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neutrophils::Catheter-related
Infections and infestations
—
—
Death not associated with CTCAE term::Disease progression NOS
General disorders
—
—
Renal failure
Renal and urinary disorders
—
—
Diarrhea
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
Hypoxia
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
—
—
Infection ::Blood
Infections and infestations
—
—
Colitis, infectious (e.g., Clostridium difficile)
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
—
Death not associated with CTCAE term::Death NOS
General disorders
—
—
Rash/desquamation
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
—
—
Febrile neutropenia
Infections and infestations
—
—
Infection with normal ANC or Grade 1 or 2 neutrophils::Sinus
Background:
Major problems with stem cell transplantation (SCT) for cancer treatment are a lack of suitable donors for patients without a human leukocyte-antigen (HLA) tissue-matched sibling and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a serious side effects of immune-suppressing chemotherapy that is given to bring the cancer under control before SCT. In GVHD, the patients immune system attacks the transplanted donor cells.
This study will try to improve the results of SCT from unrelated HLA-matched donors using targeted immune-depleting chemotherapy to bring the cancer under control before transplantation and to lower the chance of graft rejection, followed by reduced-intensity transplant chemotherapy to make the procedure less toxic.
Objectives:
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of targeted immune-depleting chemotherapy followed by reduced-intensity transplant chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancers of the blood and immune system.
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two different drug combinations to prevent GVHD. Both regimens have been successful in preventing GVHD, but they work by different mechanisms and affect the rebuilding of the immune system after the transplant.
Eligibility:
People 18 to 74 years of age with advanced or high-risk cancers of the blood and immune system who do not have a suitable HLA-matched sibling.
Design:
All patients receive chemotherapy before transplant to treat the cancer and suppress immune function.
All patients receive a conditioning regimen of cyclophosphamide for 4 days and fludarabine for 4 days before SCT to prepare for the transplant.
Patients are randomly assigned to one of two combination drug treatments to prevent GHVD as follows:
* Group 1: Tacrolimus starting 3 days before SCT and continuing for 6 months, plus methotrexate on days 1, 3, 6, and 11 post-SCT, plus sirolimus starting 3 days before the SCT and continues for 6 months following SCT.
* Group 2: Alemtuzumab for 4 days starting 8 days before SCT, plus cyclosporine starting 1 day before SCT and continuing for 6 months.
Patients receive the donors stem cells and immune cells 2 days after completing the conditioning regimen.
Patients are followed at the clinic regularly for the first 6 months after SCT, and then less often for at least 5 years. Some visits may include bone marrow aspirates and biopsies, blood draws, and other tests to monitor disease status.
A skin biopsy, oral mucosa biopsy, and saliva collection are done to study chronic GVHD.
...
Publications & conference data
7 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07137481 — Phase II Study of CD5 CAR Engineered IL15-transduced Cord Blood-derived NK Cells in Conjunction With Lymphodepleting Che
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07365306 — Epcoritamab, Rituximab, Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) as Salvage Therapy Before Autologous Stem Cell Transplant
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
NCT07444710 — Testing the Addition of an Anti-Cancer Drug, Glofitamab, to the Usual Chemotherapy Treatment (Alternating R-CHOP/R-DHAP)
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT06965114 — Testing the Combination of Anti-cancer Drugs, Tovorafenib Plus Rituximab, in Patients With Hairy Cell Leukemia
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07335562 — A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of BMS-986353 (Zolacabtagene- Autoleucel / Zola-cel), CD19-CAR T Cells, Versu
· Phase 3
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07020533 — A Vaccine (CMV-MVA Triplex Vaccine) for the Enhancement of CMV-Specific Immunity and the Prevention of CMV Viremia in Pa
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07422480 — A Study to Compare Elritercept With Epoetin Alfa to Treat Anemia in Adults With Very Low, Low, or Intermediate Risk Myel
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT07107126 — Safety and Proof-of-Concept Study of RPT1G in Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT06781099 — Feasibility Trial of Extracorporeal Iron Purification in Patients With Myelodysplastic Syndrome or Myelofibrosis
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07285044 — The Cancer Connected Access and Remote Expertise Beyond Walls Program to Provide In-Home Cancer Treatment and Improve Tr
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other National Cancer Institute (NCI) trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07147231 — Testing the Effectiveness of the Anti-cancer Drug Pidnarulex (CX-5461), in Combination With Another Anti-cancer Drug Cem
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07572123 — Evaluating the Addition of Maintenance Immunotherapy Compared to the Usual Treatment of Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07281417 — Testing the Addition of Cemiplimab (REGN2810) to Chemotherapy Treatment Given Prior to Surgery in Patients With Sinonasa
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07012044 — A Study to Find the Highest Dose of Cedazuridine and Decitabine Combination With Filgrastim as a Treatment Option After
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07437950 — Comparing Different Treatment Lengths for Venetoclax in Older People With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia (A Myel
· Phase 2
· not yet recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Last refreshed: 5 March 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00520130.