18 and older, any sex, with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) ResponsesPrimary· Weeks 24 and 48
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (≥) 20% improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and 20% improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) Physician's global assessment of disease activity, 2) participant assessment of disease activity, 3) Patient Assessment of Pain (visual analog scale \[VAS\]), 4) participant assessment of functional disability via a Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) at each visit.
Percentage of Responders at Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
22
17.1 – 26.9
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
42.2
36.4 – 48.1
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
47.9
42.0 – 53.7
Percentage of Responders at Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
19.5
14.8 – 24.2
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
48.7
42.9 – 54.6
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
50.7
44.9 – 56.5
Percentage of Participants With a Major Clinical ResponseSecondary· Week 48
Major clinical response was defined as achieving an ACR70 response and maintaining this response for a consecutive period of at least 6 months.
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
1.8
0.2 – 3.4
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
4.0
1.7 – 6.3
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
5.7
3.0 – 8.4
Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score (DAS28) RemissionSecondary· Weeks 24 and 48
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. DAS28 Remission is defined as a DAS28 score \< 2.6.
Percentage of Participants at Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
1.8
0.2 – 3.4
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
5.8
3.0 – 8.5
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
6.0
3.3 – 8.8
Percentage of Participants at Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
1.4
0.0 – 2.8
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
11.9
8.1 – 15.7
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
12.1
8.3 – 15.9
Change in DAS28 From BaselineSecondary· Weeks 24 and 48
The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], patient's global assessment of disease activity \[visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 0 to approximately 10.
Baseline
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
6.50
± 1.014
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
6.47
± 1.217
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
6.44
± 1.039
Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
-0.99
± 1.166
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
-1.60
± 1.307
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
-1.91
± 1.349
Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
-1.13
± 1.404
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
-2.11
± 1.348
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
-2.38
± 1.496
Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Rates of Good/ ModerateSecondary· Weeks 24 and 48
The EULAR response rate was based on the assessment of disease activity using the DAS28. The EULAR response criteria included not only change in disease activity but current disease activity. To be classified as responders, participants had to have a significant change in DAS28 and a low current disease activity. There were 4 categories of EULAR response rates: good, moderate, good/moderate, and none.
Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
31.4
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
54.2
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
61.0
Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
24.9
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
58.8
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
60.3
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 ResponseSecondary· Weeks 24 and 48
ACR50 response is defined as a ≥ 50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: physician's global assessment of disease activity (MDG), patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGA), patient's assessment of pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire with Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP).
Percentage of Participants at Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
7.9
4.8 – 11.1
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
21.3
16.5 – 26.1
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
24.8
19.8 – 29.9
Percentage of Participants at Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
9
5.7 – 12.4
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
28.5
23.2 – 33.8
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
30.9
25.5 – 36.2
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR70 ResponseSecondary· Weeks 24 and 48
ACR70 response is defined as a ≥ 70% improvement (reduction) compared with Baseline for both total joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: physician's global assessment of disease activity (MDG), patient's global assessment of disease activity (PGA), patient's assessment of pain, HAQ-DI and CRP.
Percentage of Participants at Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
2.9
0.9 – 4.9
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
7.6
4.5 – 10.7
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
9.9
6.4 – 13.4
Percentage of Participants at Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
4.3
1.9 – 6.7
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
11.2
7.5 – 14.9
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
18.1
13.6 – 22.6
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in the HAQ-DI ScoreSecondary· Weeks 24 and 48
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI): The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index is a patient reported questionnaire specific for RA. It consists of 20 questions referring to eight component. Reduction in the HAQ-DI score of 0.25 units from baseline to weeks 24 and 48 represented a minimal clinically relevant improvement.
Percentage of Participants at Week 24
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
32.9
27.3 – 38.4
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
52.3
46.5 – 58.2
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
58.5
52.8 – 64.3
Percentage of Participants at Week 48
Group
Value
95% CI
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
23.1
18.1 – 28.1
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
50.5
44.7 – 56.4
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
51.8
45.9 – 57.6
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: From Day 1 to Week 48 and Week 96.
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Placebo x 2 IV + Non-Biologic DMARD
Serious: 41/276 (15%)
Deaths: 5/276
Ocrelizumab 200 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
Serious: 46/276 (17%)
Deaths: 2/276
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 + Non-Biologic DMARD
Serious: 40/284 (14%)
Deaths: 4/284
Ocrelizumab 500 mg x 2 IV + Non-biologic DMARD (OLE)
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab, compared with placebo, in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have an inadequate response to at least one anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Patients will be randomized to receive placebo, 200mg of intravenous ocrelizumab, or 500mg of i.v. ocrelizumab on days 1 and 15. A repeat course of i.v. treatment will be administered at weeks 24 and 26. All patients will receive stable doses of either concomitant methotrexate (7.5-25mg/week) or leflunomide (10-20mg po daily) and may receive additional DMARDs. The treatment period is planned for 48 weeks (until primary analysis) and then participants will enter the open label phase until the drug is commercialized. Target sample size is 1000.
Publications & conference data
4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT06714461 — A Study of the Effectiveness of Additional Risk Minimization Measures Related to ARAVA® (Leflunomide) in Saudi Arabia
· active not recruiting
NCT06454383 — Gemcitabine and Leflunomide in Patients With Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT06229340 — Leflunomide or Combination of MEK Inhibitor and Hydroxychloroquine for Refractory Patients With RAS Mutations
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT05443425 — Leflunomide in Combination With Steroids for the Treatment of Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease After Donor Stem Cell Tran
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT05937191 — Leflunomide for Idiopathic Pulmonary Hemosiderosis in Children
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07433335 — A Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of SR-878 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07491016 — Efficacy and Safety of Telitacicept Combined With Baricitinib for Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis
· recruiting
NCT07171983 — A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Drug Levels of BMS-986454 in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07246096 — Exploratory Clinical Study on the Safety and Efficacy of Anti- CD19/BCMA U CAR-T Cell Injection for the Treatment of Rel
· EARLY_PHASE1
· recruiting
NCT07363590 — A Clinical Study of MK-1045 in People With Lupus or Rheumatoid Arthritis (MK-1045-004)
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Other Genentech, Inc. trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT06984341 — A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Cellular Kinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of P-CD19CD20-ALLO1 in P
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07448038 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics (PD), and Pharmacokinetics (PK) of Selnoflast in Reducing Vas
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT07425522 — A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacokinetics of RO7823653 in Participants With D
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07342114 — A Dose-Escalation Study of RO7875913 in Healthy Participants
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT07214662 — A Study to Evaluate the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Activity of GDC-0587 as a Monotherapy and in Combination With Gire
· Phase 1
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Genentech, Inc.
Last refreshed: 12 August 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00476996.