Last reviewed · How we verify
A Phase III Comparative (Double-blind, Double-dummy) Randomised, Multi-centre Study to Assess the Efficacy of Pyronaridine Artesunate (180:60mg) Versus Coartem® (Artemether Lumefantrine) in Children & Adult Patients With Falciparum Malaria
The primary objective of this phase III study is to compare the efficacy and safety of the fixed combination of pyronaridine artesunate (Pyramax®, PA) with that of Coartem® (artemether lumefantrine, AL) in children and adults with uncomplicated P falciparum malaria in Africa and South East Asia.
Details
| Lead sponsor | Medicines for Malaria Venture |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 3 |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 1272 |
| Start date | 2007-01 |
| Completion | 2008-05 |
Conditions
- Malaria
Interventions
- Pyronaridine artesunate
- Coartem® (artemether lumefantrine)
Primary outcomes
- PCR-Corrected Adequate Clinical and Parasitological Response (ACPR) Rate on Day 28 — Day 28
Percentage of subjects with PCR-corrected adequate clinical and parasitological response (ACPR) on Day 28, defined as absence of parasitaemia on Day 28 without the subject's meeting any of the criteria of early treatment failure, late clinical failure, or late parasitological failure.
Countries
Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ghana, Indonesia, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, Philippines, Senegal, The Gambia