Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT00414700: TIGACT01

Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of ChondroCelect® (Via Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation) vs Microfracture (as Procedure) in the Repair of Symptomatic Cartilaginous Defects of the Femoral Condyles

Completed Phase 3 Results posted Last updated 22 September 2011
What this trial tests

Phase 3 trial testing ChondroCelect implantation in Articular Cartilage Lesion of the Femoral Condyle in 118 participants. Completed in 1 January 2010.

Timeline
1 February 2002
Primary endpoint
1 July 2006
1 January 2010

Quick facts

Lead sponsorTiGenix n.v.
PhasePhase 3
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingsingle
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment118
Start date1 February 2002
Primary completion1 July 2006
Estimated completion1 January 2010
Sites12 locations across Belgium, Croatia, Germany, Netherlands

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

TiGenix n.v. — full company profile →

Who can join

Adults 18 to 50, any sex, with Articular Cartilage Lesion of the Femoral Condyle. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

What's being measured

Primary outcomes are the specific endpoints the trial is designed to prove or disprove.

Sponsor's own description

This is a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial of ChondroCelect® in an Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) procedure compared to the procedure of microfracture (MF) in the repair of symptomatic cartilage lesions of the knee. Eligible patients attended two screening visits and were booked for arthroscopy approximately 2 weeks later. At that time, patients were randomized to either ACI with ChondroCelect® or to MF, a procedure in which the subchondral bone is perforated to allow a bloodcloth to form scar tissue. Patients randomized to MF had the procedure performed at the time of their arthroscopy; those randomized to ACI with ChondroCelect® had their cells harvested during the arthroscopy and then returned to the clinic approximately 4 weeks later for an open knee procedure, during which the ACI procedure using ChondroCelect® was performed. Patients subsequently followed the same rehabilitation program and had follow-up assessments up to 12 months post-surgery. The 12-month visit was the end-of-study visit for the TIG/ACT/01/2000 protocol. Subject to satisfying the eligibility criteria, patients who had participated in the initial 12 month trial could enter the extension trial. The 12-month visit for the initial study was the baseline visit for the extension study. During the extension study, patients have follow-up assessments up to 60 months post-surgery.

Publications & conference data

3 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. The Current Status of Clinical Trials on Biologics for Cartilage Repair and Osteoarthritis Treatment: An Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov Data.
    Zhang Z, Schon L. · · 2022 · cited 21× · PMID 35546280 · DOI 10.1177/19476035221093065
  2. Advanced Therapy medicinal products for autologous chondrocytes and comparison of regulatory systems in target countries.
    Kim J, Park J, Song SY, Kim E. · · 2022 · cited 14× · PMID 35582708 · DOI 10.1016/j.reth.2022.04.004
  3. Barriers to Treg therapy in Europe: From production to regulation.
    Hennessy C, Deptula M, Hester J, Issa F. · · 2023 · cited 11× · PMID 36744143 · DOI 10.3389/fmed.2023.1090721

Verify or expand the search:

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00414700.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing