Last reviewed · How we verify
Multicenter Randomized Phase II Study of Erlotinib, Cisplatin and Radiotherapy Versus Cisplatin and Radiotherapy in Patients With Stage III and IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
This randomized phase II trial is studying cisplatin and radiation therapy together with or without erlotinib hydrochloride to compare how well they work in treating patients with stage III or stage IV head and neck cancer. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cisplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Specialized radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation directly to the tumor may kill more tumor cells and cause less damage to normal tissue. Erlotinib hydrochloride may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth. It may also make tumor cells more sensitive to radiation therapy. Giving cisplatin and radiation therapy together with erlotinib hydrochloride may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known whether cisplatin and radiation therapy are more effective with or without erlotinib hydrochloride in treating head and neck cancer
Details
| Lead sponsor | University of Washington |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 2 |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 204 |
| Start date | 2006-06 |
Conditions
- Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx
- Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx
- Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity
- Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasopharynx
- Stage III Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx
- Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx
- Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx
- Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lip and Oral Cavity
- Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Nasopharynx
- Stage IV Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx
Interventions
- erlotinib hydrochloride
- cisplatin
- 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy
- intensity-modulated radiation therapy
- quality-of-life assessment
Primary outcomes
- Comparison of the Percentage of Participants With a Complete Response in Each Treatment Arm — 12 weeks after the completion of therapy
Complete response requires both a pathological complete response (independent of observer) and a complete response radiologically (RECIST 1.0).
Countries
United States