18 and older, female only, with Cesarean Section. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Proportion of Women Undergoing Cesarean Section for Fetal Intolerance of LaborPrimary· At time of delivery
The number of women undergoing cesarean section will be compared between the misoprostol arm and EASI arm. The primary hypothesis is that the odds of receiving a cesarean section is lower among patients assigned to EASI when compared to patients who receive misoprostol.
Group
Value
95% CI
Misoprostol
0
EASI
0
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: Adverse event data was collected for 1 year, 9 months..
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
The primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effect of misoprostol vs extra amniotic saline infusion via a catheter (EASI) for cervical ripening on the proportion of patients delivered by cesarean section for fetal intolerance of labor versus vaginal delivery. The primary hypothesis is that patients undergoing cervical ripening with EASI catheter are less likely to undergo cesarean section for fetal intolerance of labor when compared to women who receive misoprostol.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.
NCT07353281 — Carbetocin vs Misoprostol for Postpartum Hemorrhage Prevention
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06669533 — Use Misoprostol to Optimize Prevention of Cervical Cancer
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07416487 — Comparison of Outcome of Foley Catheter Versus Misoprostol for Induction of Labor
· NA
· completed
NCT06765473 — Comparison Between Preoperative Vaginal and Postoperative Sublingual Misoprostol for Prevention of Postpartum Hemorrhage
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT06452719 — Letrozole and Misoprostol for Early Pregnancy Loss Management
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Cesarean Section
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07511491 — Ondansetron Lozenge Versus Intravenous for Prevention of Shivering in Cesarean Section
· NA
· recruiting
NCT06282952 — Health Outcomes in C-Section Infants With Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07499947 — Predicting Spinal Hypotension in Cesarean Section
· recruiting
NCT07413185 — Relationship Between the Severity of Sleep Deprivation in the First 48 Hours Postpartum, Breastfeeding Motivation, and B
· recruiting
NCT07440667 — Restrictive vs Liberal Intraoperative Fluid Strategy and Postoperative Outcomes After Elective Cesarean Section
· NA
· recruiting
Other Loyola University trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07517224 — Assessing the Effect of an Aerobic Exercise Program on Vascular Function in Women With Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06486714 — Mechanical Alignment Versus Kinematic Alignment Total Knee Arthroplasty
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT07216664 — Multisensory Early Oral Administration of Human Milk (M-MILK) for Very Preterm Infants
· NA
· recruiting
NCT07226505 — Effects of Core Strengthening Exercises for Treating TMD
· NA
· not yet recruiting
NCT06525701 — Surgeon Core-strengthening Program as a Modifier for Exertion Associated With Vaginal Surgery
· NA
· completed
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Loyola University
Last refreshed: 13 March 2017
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00383942.