Adults 20 to 74, female only, with Neoplasms, Breast. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Overall Tumor ResponsePrimary· Baseline and then followed every 4 weeks until disease progression or death. If treatment was terminated due to adverse events, then followed every 12 weeks until disease progression is noted.
Tumor response was measured as the number of participants achieving either a complete response (CR; disappearance of all target lesions) or partial response (PR; 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions) among all participants who received study treatment. Tumor response was evaluated as the best response in accordance with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). Progressive disease: a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions. Stable disease: small changes that do not meet the above-mentioned criteria.
Complete response
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
1
Partial response
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
8
Stable disease
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
18
Progressive disease
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
29
Unknown
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
2
Duration of ResponseSecondary· First noted efficacy to disease progression; baseline and followed every 4 weeks until disease progression or death. If treatment was terminated due to adverse events, then followed every 12 weeks until disease progression is noted.
Duration of response is defined as the time between the point at which efficacy was noted until disease progression or death due to breast cancer.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
20.6
16.1 – 32.1
Time to ProgressionSecondary· Baseline to disease progression or death; baseline and then followed every 4 weeks until disease progression or death. If treatment was terminated due to adverse events, then followed every 12 weeks until disease progression or death.
Time to progression was defined as the time from the start of treatment until disease progression or death. Disease progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
8.4
7.4 – 23.9
Clinical BenefitSecondary· Time at which all participants had been followed for at least 24 weeks; baseline and then followed every 4 weeks until disease progression (DP) or death. If treatment was terminated due to adverse events, then followed every 12 weeks until DP or death.
Clinical benefit was defined as the percentage of participants achieving complete response, partial response, and stable disease for more than 24 weeks.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
17.2
Time to ResponseSecondary· Time at which all participants had been followed for at least 24 weeks; baseline and then followed every 4 weeks until disease progression (DP) or death. If treatment was terminated due to adverse event, then followed every 12 weeks until DP or death.
Time to response was defined as the time from the start of treatment until first documented evidence of partial or complete tumor response (whichever status is recorded first).
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
111
56 – 279
4-month Progression Free SurvivalSecondary· Baseline to Month 4 (Week 16)
The percentage of participants without progression or deaths at 4 months (16 weeks) after the start of dosing.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
32.3
6-month Progression Free SurvivalSecondary· Baseline to Month 6 (Week 24)
The percentage of participants without progression or deaths at 6 months (24 weeks) after the start of dosing.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
22.8
Overall SurvivalSecondary· Start of dosing to death; baseline and then followed every 4 weeks until death while on treatment. If alive at time of treatment termination, then followed every 12 weeks until death.
Overall survival was measured as the time between the start of dosing until death, regardless of cause.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
43.1
24.3 – 80.7
Mean Phosphorylated 58 kDa Serine/Threonine Protein Kinase (p-AKT) H Score for All ParticipantsSecondary· Tumor samples taken at baseline
Intra-tumoral expression levels of AKT, a tumor tissue biomarker, were measured using immunohistochemistry methods that incorporated both intensity and distribution of staining. A value designated the H score was derived by summing the percentages of cells staining at each intensity multiplied by the weighted intensity of staining (0, 1+, 2+, 3+: 3+ indicates the strongest staining, 2+ indicates medium staining, 1+ indicates weak staining, and 0 indicates no staining). Minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 300; the maximum score indicates the strongest expression.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
13.9
± 26.32
Mean p-BAD H Score for All ParticipantsSecondary· Tumor samples taken at baseline
Intra-tumoral expression levels of BAD, a tumor tissue biomarker, were measured using immunohistochemistry methods that incorporated both intensity and distribution of staining. A value designated the H score was derived by summing the percentages of cells staining at each intensity multiplied by the weighted intensity of staining (0, 1+, 2+, 3+: 3+ indicates the strongest staining, 2+ indicates medium staining, 1+ indicates weak staining, and 0 indicates no staining). Minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 300; the maximum score indicates the strongest expression.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
12.8
± 36.50
Mean Bcl-2 H Score for All ParticipantsSecondary· Tumor samples taken at baseline
Intra-tumoral expression levels of Bcl-2, a tumor tissue biomarker, were measured using immunohistochemistry methods that incorporated both intensity and distribution of staining. A value designated the H score was derived by summing the percentages of cells staining at each intensity multiplied by the weighted intensity of staining (0, 1+, 2+, 3+: 3+ indicates the strongest staining, 2+ indicates medium staining, 1+ indicates weak staining, and 0 indicates no staining). Minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 300; the maximum score indicates the strongest expression.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
20.9
± 47.82
Mean Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 3 (ErbB3) H Score for All ParticipantsSecondary· Tumor samples taken at baseline
Intra-tumoral expression levels of ErbB3, a tumor tissue biomarker, were measured using immunohistochemistry methods that incorporated both intensity and distribution of staining. A value designated the H score was derived by summing the percentages of cells staining at each intensity multiplied by the weighted intensity of staining (0, 1+, 2+, 3+: 3+ indicates the strongest staining, 2+ indicates medium staining, 1+ indicates weak staining, and 0 indicates no staining). Minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 300; the maximum score indicates the strongest expression.
Group
Value
95% CI
Lapatinib Monotherapy
185.5
± 50.61
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Reporting threshold: 0%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Lapatinib Monotherapy
Serious: 14/58 (24%)
Deaths: —
Serious adverse events (17 terms)
Reaction
System
Lapatinib Monotherapy
Anorexia
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
—
Pneumonia
Infections and infestations
—
Hepatic function abnormal
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
Hypercalcemia
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
—
Cellulitis
Infections and infestations
—
Hepatomegaly
Hepatobiliary disorders
—
Malaise
General disorders
—
Disease progression
General disorders
—
Lymphocyte count decreased
Investigations
—
Blood uric acid increased
Investigations
—
Nausea
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
Diarrhea
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
Vomiting
Gastrointestinal disorders
—
Back pain
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
—
Ventricular dysfunction
Cardiac disorders
—
Dizziness
Nervous system disorders
—
Cancer pain
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
Other adverse events (182 terms — click to expand)
This study (EGF104911) is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lapatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Eligible subjects must have ErbB2 overexpressing tumors and are refractory to treatment with anthracycline, taxanes and trastuzumab containing regimens. The study data obtained from EGF104911 will be combined with the data from EGF100642 and integrated analysis will be carried out in order to enhance the credibility of the study results.
Publications & conference data
No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial. Completed trials usually publish results within 12-18 months.
NCT01891357 — Phase II Trial to Validate Markers for a Response Evaluation of a Combined Therapy in Patients With HER2+ Breast Cancer
· Phase 2
· terminated
NCT01875666 — Defining the HER2 Positive (+) Breast Cancer Kinome Response to Trastuzumab, Pertuzumab, Combination Trastuzumab +Pertuz
· EARLY_PHASE1
· completed
NCT01808573 — A Study of Neratinib Plus Capecitabine Versus Lapatinib Plus Capecitabine in Patients With HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cance
· Phase 3
· completed
NCT00996762 — A Study in Cancer Patients to Evaluate the Bioequivalence of Alternative Formulations of Lapatinib
· Phase 1
· completed
NCT00953576 — Ketoconazole, Hydrocortisone, Dutasteride and Lapatinib (KHAD-L) in Prostate Cancer
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· terminated
Other recruiting trials for Neoplasms, Breast
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT06819215 — Phase I/II Clinical Study to Evaluate VB15010 Tablets in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT04915755 — Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Niraparib to Placebo in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 Negative (HE
· Phase 3
· active not recruiting
Other GlaxoSmithKline trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07569081 — A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Momelotinib in Participants With Vacuoles, E1-enzyme, X-linked, Autoinflam
· Phase 2, PHASE3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07406347 — A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Reactogenicity of an Investigational Pneumococcal Vaccine in Infants Receiving 3-dose
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
NCT07286266 — A Study to Investigate GSK5733584 Compared With Chemotherapy in Participants With Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer (BEH
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07286331 — A Study to Investigate GSK5733584 Compared With Chemotherapy in Participants With Recurrent Endometrial Cancer (BEHOLD-E
· Phase 3
· not yet recruiting
NCT07406334 — A Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Reactogenicity of an Investigational Pneumococcal Vaccine in Toddlers 12 to 15 Months
· Phase 1
· not yet recruiting
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by GlaxoSmithKline
Last refreshed: 31 January 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00320411.