Last reviewed · How we verify
Comparison of Rectal Trumpet and Standard Care
Primary: To determine the effectiveness of the rectal trumpet compared to the standard care in maintaining skin integrity in patients with fecal incontinence. Hypothesis (H1): There will be no difference in the failure rates of rectal area skin integrity between subjects receiving the rectal trumpet and those receiving treatment as usual (staqndard care). Secondary: To determine the ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and level of patient comfort with the rectal trumpet compared to the standard care in patients with fecal incontinence. Secondary (exploratory) hypotheses: There will be differences in the ease of use of the devices, costs of the devices, and patient comfort relative to the devices.
Details
| Lead sponsor | Christiana Care Health Services |
|---|---|
| Phase | NA |
| Status | WITHDRAWN |
| Start date | Thu Sep 01 2005 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) |
| Completion | Mon Jun 25 2007 00:00:00 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) |
Conditions
- Fecal Incontinence
Interventions
- Rusch Nasopharyngeal Airway
Countries
United States