A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Tolerability and Safety of Rituximab When Given in Combination With Methotrexate and Etanercept (Enbrel) or Methotrexate and Adalimumab (Humira) in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

NCT00298272 Phase 2 TERMINATED Results posted

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and safety of rituximab in combination with methotrexate (MTX) and etanercept or adalimumab in participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The secondary objective was to explore the efficacy of rituximab in combination with MTX and etanercept or adalimumab in participants with active RA.

Details

Lead sponsor	Biogen
Phase	Phase 2
Status	TERMINATED
Enrolment	54
Start date	2006-05
Completion	2011-07

Conditions

• Rheumatoid Arthritis

Interventions

• IDEC-C2B8 (rituximab)
• Placebo
• Methotrexate
• Etanercept
• Adalimumab
• Methylprednisolone
• Folate

Primary outcomes

• Proportion of Participants With at Least One Serious Infection Through Week 24 — Through Week 24
  An infection was considered serious if it required intravenous (IV) antibiotics or met the regulatory definition of a serious adverse event (SAE). An SAE was any event that resulted in death, resulted in a congenital anomaly in a child of a participant in the study, caused or prolonged an inpatient hospitalization, resulted in significant or persistent disability, or was considered by the investigator to be an important medical event that may have required intervention to prevent any of the above-listed outcomes.
• Number of Participants With Any Infections or Any Grade 3/4 Infections Through Week 24 — Through Week 24
  Infections were defined as adverse events that map to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class (SOC) of "infections and infestations" and also included other infectious events that do not map to this SOC (e.g., cholecystitis, pleurisy, conjunctivitis, acne, tongue ulceration). Participants with multiple infections were calculated only once. The severity of all reported adverse events, including infections, was graded and reported according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. This scale defines the severity of an adverse event as follows: Grade 1 = a mild adverse event, Grade 2 = a moderate adverse event, Grade 3 = a severe adverse event, and Grade 4 = a life-threatening or disabling adverse event.
• Maximum Duration of Infections Through Week 24 — Week 24
  Infections were defined as adverse events that map to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) system organ class (SOC) of "infections and infestations" and also included other infectious events that do not map to this SOC (e.g., cholecystitis, pleurisy, conjunctivitis, acne, tongue ulceration). For participants with multiple infections, only the infection with the longest duration was included in this analysis.
• Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Through Week 24 — Through Week 24
  An AE was any sign (including an abnormal laboratory result that the investigator determined to be clinically significant), symptom, or diagnosis/disease that is unfavorable or unintended, that was new, or if pre-existing, worsened in a participant and that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An SAE was any event that resulted in death, resulted in a congenital anomaly in a child of a participant in the study, caused or prolonged an inpatient hospitalization, resulted in significant or persistent disability, or was considered by the investigator to be an important medical event that may have required intervention to prevent any of the above-listed outcomes.
• Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Immunological and Laboratory Assessment Findings — Through Week 24
  The following immunological assessments were conducted: autoantibody concentrations for RF, anti-cyclic-citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody concentrations, quantitative immunoglobulin levels, and lymphocyte assessments of T- and B-cell populations, determined using whole blood expanded fluorescent-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. The following laboratory assessments were performed: hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC) with differential, and platelet counts; aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, total protein, albumin, total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), uric acid, creatinine, random glucose, potassium, sodium, chloride, calcium, and phosphorous; blood, protein, and glucose (microscopic examination, if abnormal and applicable).

Countries

United States