Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT00102687

Alternative Dosing Regimens of Subcutaneous Azacitidine for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Completed Phase 2 Results posted Last updated 22 November 2019
What this trial tests

Phase 2 trial testing azacitidine in Myelodysplastic Syndromes in 151 participants. Completed in 1 August 2008.

Timeline
1 January 2005
Primary endpoint
1 August 2008
1 August 2008

Quick facts

Lead sponsorCelgene
PhasePhase 2
StatusCompleted
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Allocationrandomized
Designparallel
Maskingnone
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment151
Start date1 January 2005
Primary completion1 August 2008
Estimated completion1 August 2008
Sites31 locations across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Celgene — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.

Number of Participants In Best Hematological Response Categories as Determined by the Investigator Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria For Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) During the Initial Study Period. Primary · Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months

Participant counts by best hematological response; complete remission(CR) is better than a partial remission(PR) which is better than stable disease(SD). Investigator determined responses followed IWG 2000 criteria for MDS CR: repeat bone marrow show \<5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood evaluations lasting \>=2 months of hemoglobin(\>110 g/L), neutrophils(\>=1.5x10\^9/L), platelets(\>=100x10\^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia PR is the same as CR for peripheral blood: bone marrow shows blasts decrease by \>=50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment (see Population Descrip

Overall Response (CR+PR)
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-54
Aza-5-2-23
Aza-5-2-54
Complete remission (CR)
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-52
Aza-5-2-22
Aza-5-2-52
Partial remission (PR)
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-52
Aza-5-2-21
Aza-5-2-52
Stable disease
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-522
Aza-5-2-219
Aza-5-2-520
Number of Participants With Best Hematological Improvement Derived Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria for MDS During the Initial Study Period. Primary · Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months

IWG 2000 Criteria: Pretreatment=hemoglobin \<110g/L or RBC transfusion-dependence, platelet count \<100x10\^9/L or platelet transfusion dependence, absolute neutrophil count \<1.5x10\^9/L. Erythroid response: Major-\>20g/L increase in hemoglobin or transfusion independence. Minor- 10-20g/L increase in hemoglobin or \>=50% decrease in transfusion requirements. Platelet response: Major-absolute increase of platelet count by \>=30x10\^9/L or platelet transfusion independence. Minor-\>=50% increase in platelet count with net increase \>10x10\^9/L but \<30x10\^9/L. (continued in Population Descr

Any Improvement n=50,49,47
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-529
Aza-5-2-220
Aza-5-2-526
Erythroid response - Major n=44,43,41
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-518
Aza-5-2-215
Aza-5-2-518
Erythroid response - Minor n=44,43,41
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-54
Aza-5-2-21
Aza-5-2-52
Platelet response - Major n=24,28,28
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-510
Aza-5-2-211
Aza-5-2-510
Platelet response - Minor n=24,28,28
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-52
Aza-5-2-20
Aza-5-2-50
Neutrophil response - Major n=24,22,16
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-54
Aza-5-2-23
Aza-5-2-53
Neutrophil response - Minor n=24,22,16
GroupValue95% CI
Aza-52
Aza-5-2-20
Aza-5-2-50
Number of Participants With Overall Best Hematologic Response and Hematologic Improvement Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS During the Initial Study Period Primary · Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months

Number of participants whose best hematological outcome was either complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) (as determined by the investigator), or any hematologic improvement (based on the IWG 2000 criteria for MDS). See previous outcomes for detailed definitions.

GroupValue95% CI
Aza-530
Aza-5-2-220
Aza-5-2-527
Baseline Hemoglobin Values Secondary · Day 1 (randomization)

The median values for hemoglobin based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for hemoglobin. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.

GroupValue95% CI
Aza-594.063.0 – 131.0
Aza-5-2-298.070.0 – 135.0
Aza-5-2-595.559.0 – 145.0
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at End of Initial Study Period (6 Months) Secondary · 6 months

The difference between hemoglobin values at the end of the initial study period minus the hemoglobin values at baseline.

GroupValue95% CI
Aza-52.3-25.9 – 41.8
Aza-5-2-22.9-33.0 – 31.7
Aza-5-2-55.3-20.4 – 30.4
Number of Participants Who Improved or Maintained The Hematologic Response From the Initial Study Period (Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS) During the Maintenance Period Primary · 24 months

Hematologic response during the maintenance period are compared to the response in the initial study period. Initial response could have been a complete remission, a partial remission, stable disease or a hematologic improvement. Maintenance period best response is after randomization to a maintenance arm for those randomized, and is after the start of cycle 7 for those remaining on initial period treatment throughout the study.

Improved response from initial study period
GroupValue95% CI
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks7
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks10
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance12
Maintained response from initial study period
GroupValue95% CI
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks6
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks5
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance10
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the End of the Maintenance Study Period Secondary · 24 months

The difference between hemoglobin values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the hemoglobin values at baseline.

GroupValue95% CI
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks5.9-27.9 – 54.8
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks7.3-14.4 – 55.5
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance14.5-5.5 – 60.4
Baseline Platelet Values Secondary · Day 1 (randomization)

The median values for platelets based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for platelets. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.

GroupValue95% CI
Aza-5110.09.0 – 516.0
Aza-5-2-290.08.0 – 581.0
Aza-5-2-586.08.0 – 699.0
Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months) Secondary · 6 months

The difference between platelet values at the end of the initial study period minus the platelet values at baseline.

GroupValue95% CI
Aza-54.8-116.3 – 179.1
Aza-5-2-25.7-145.6 – 192.6
Aza-5-2-512.6-300.9 – 213.6
Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of the Maintenance Study Period (Month 24) Secondary · 24 months

The difference between platelet values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the platelet values at baseline.

GroupValue95% CI
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks19.8-157.5 – 129.6
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks7.7-279.8 – 166.3
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance17.3-124.7 – 223.3
Baseline Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) Values Secondary · Day 1 (randomization)

The median values for ANC based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for ANC. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.

GroupValue95% CI
Aza-51.60.1 – 13.9
Aza-5-2-21.90.1 – 162.3
Aza-5-2-52.30.3 – 139.3
Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months) Secondary · 6 months

The difference between ANC values at the end of the initial study period minus the ANC values at baseline.

GroupValue95% CI
Aza-5-0.3-4.6 – 1.9
Aza-5-2-2-0.3-35.9 – 1.4
Aza-5-2-5-0.4-9.7 – 8.5

Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov

Time frame: The 3 groups in the Initial Period cover Day 1-6 months, and up to 24 months for participants that continued that treatment. The 2 Maintenance Period groups cover months 7-24 for subjects who were randomized to 1 of the 2 Maintenance treatment arms.. Reporting threshold: 5%. Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.

Aza-5
Serious: 18/50 (36%)
Deaths:
Aza-5-2-2
Serious: 27/50 (54%)
Deaths:
Aza-5-2-5
Serious: 22/48 (46%)
Deaths:
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks
Serious: 7/22 (32%)
Deaths:
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks
Serious: 13/21 (62%)
Deaths:

Serious adverse events (103 terms)

ReactionSystemAza-5Aza-5-2-2Aza-5-2-5Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4…Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6…
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
PneumoniaInfections and infestations
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
Acute myeloid leukaemiaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Myelodysplastic syndromeNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Cardiac failure congestiveCardiac disorders
PyrexiaGeneral disorders
Lobar pneumoniaInfections and infestations
PancytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders
BradycardiaCardiac disorders
Cardiac valve vegetationCardiac disorders
Myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders
Myocardial ischaemiaCardiac disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Colitis ischaemicGastrointestinal disorders
Colonic polypGastrointestinal disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders
EnteritisGastrointestinal disorders
GastritisGastrointestinal disorders
Other adverse events (99 terms — click to expand)

ReactionSystemAza-5Aza-5-2-2Aza-5-2-5Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4…Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6…
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders
FatigueGeneral disorders
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders
Injection site erythemaGeneral disorders
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders
Injection site painGeneral disorders
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders
ThrombocytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
AnorexiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
HeadacheNervous system disorders
Injection site pruritusGeneral disorders
PyrexiaGeneral disorders
DizzinessNervous system disorders
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Injection site bruisingGeneral disorders
LeukopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders
AstheniaGeneral disorders
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders
HyperglycaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
DepressionPsychiatric disorders
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PruritusSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Abdominal painGastrointestinal disorders
Injection site desquamationGeneral disorders
ContusionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications
Dyspnoea exertionalRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
EpistaxisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pruritus generalisedSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
DyspepsiaGastrointestinal disorders
Injection site rashGeneral disorders
MyalgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pharyngolaryngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HypotensionVascular disorders
LymphopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders

Most-reported serious reactions: Anaemia, Pneumonia, Febrile neutropenia, Urinary tract infection, Acute myeloid leukaemia, Myelodysplastic syndrome, Neutropenia, Thrombocytopenia.

Data from ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00102687 adverse events section.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to determine if azacitidine, combined with Best Supportive Care (BSC), is effective in treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) when given according to a different doses and dosing schedules.

Publications & conference data

4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):

  1. Trials with 'epigenetic' drugs: an update.
    Nebbioso A, Carafa V, Benedetti R, Altucci L. · · 2012 · cited 162× · PMID 23103179 · DOI 10.1016/j.molonc.2012.09.004
  2. Epigenetic regulation in hematopoiesis and its implications in the targeted therapy of hematologic malignancies.
    Zhao A, Zhou H, Yang J, Li M, et al · · 2023 · cited 81× · PMID 36797244 · DOI 10.1038/s41392-023-01342-6
  3. Epimutational profile of hematologic malignancies as attractive target for new epigenetic therapies.
    Fratta E, Montico B, Rizzo A, Colizzi F, et al · · 2016 · cited 17× · PMID 27329599 · DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.10033
  4. Historical expectations with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor monotherapy in MDS: when is combination therapy truly "promising"?
    Brunner AM, Fell G, Steensma DP. · · 2022 · cited 3× · PMID 35143613 · DOI 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006357

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of azacitidine

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Other Celgene trials

Trials by the same sponsor.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00102687.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing