18 and older, any sex, with Myelodysplastic Syndromes. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.
Results — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Per-arm endpoint measurements with 95% confidence intervals where reported. Source: trial results section.
Number of Participants In Best Hematological Response Categories as Determined by the Investigator Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria For Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) During the Initial Study Period.Primary· Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
Participant counts by best hematological response; complete remission(CR) is better than a partial remission(PR) which is better than stable disease(SD).
Investigator determined responses followed IWG 2000 criteria for MDS CR: repeat bone marrow show \<5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood evaluations lasting \>=2 months of hemoglobin(\>110 g/L), neutrophils(\>=1.5x10\^9/L), platelets(\>=100x10\^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia PR is the same as CR for peripheral blood: bone marrow shows blasts decrease by \>=50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment (see Population Descrip
Overall Response (CR+PR)
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
4
Aza-5-2-2
3
Aza-5-2-5
4
Complete remission (CR)
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
2
Aza-5-2-2
2
Aza-5-2-5
2
Partial remission (PR)
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
2
Aza-5-2-2
1
Aza-5-2-5
2
Stable disease
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
22
Aza-5-2-2
19
Aza-5-2-5
20
Number of Participants With Best Hematological Improvement Derived Using International Working Group 2000 (IWG 2000) Criteria for MDS During the Initial Study Period.Primary· Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
IWG 2000 Criteria: Pretreatment=hemoglobin \<110g/L or RBC transfusion-dependence, platelet count \<100x10\^9/L or platelet transfusion dependence, absolute neutrophil count \<1.5x10\^9/L.
Erythroid response: Major-\>20g/L increase in hemoglobin or transfusion independence. Minor- 10-20g/L increase in hemoglobin or \>=50% decrease in transfusion requirements.
Platelet response: Major-absolute increase of platelet count by \>=30x10\^9/L or platelet transfusion independence. Minor-\>=50% increase in platelet count with net increase \>10x10\^9/L but \<30x10\^9/L.
(continued in Population Descr
Any Improvement n=50,49,47
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
29
Aza-5-2-2
20
Aza-5-2-5
26
Erythroid response - Major n=44,43,41
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
18
Aza-5-2-2
15
Aza-5-2-5
18
Erythroid response - Minor n=44,43,41
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
4
Aza-5-2-2
1
Aza-5-2-5
2
Platelet response - Major n=24,28,28
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
10
Aza-5-2-2
11
Aza-5-2-5
10
Platelet response - Minor n=24,28,28
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
2
Aza-5-2-2
0
Aza-5-2-5
0
Neutrophil response - Major n=24,22,16
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
4
Aza-5-2-2
3
Aza-5-2-5
3
Neutrophil response - Minor n=24,22,16
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
2
Aza-5-2-2
0
Aza-5-2-5
0
Number of Participants With Overall Best Hematologic Response and Hematologic Improvement Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS During the Initial Study PeriodPrimary· Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
Number of participants whose best hematological outcome was either complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) (as determined by the investigator), or any hematologic improvement (based on the IWG 2000 criteria for MDS). See previous outcomes for detailed definitions.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
30
Aza-5-2-2
20
Aza-5-2-5
27
Baseline Hemoglobin ValuesSecondary· Day 1 (randomization)
The median values for hemoglobin based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for hemoglobin. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
94.0
63.0 – 131.0
Aza-5-2-2
98.0
70.0 – 135.0
Aza-5-2-5
95.5
59.0 – 145.0
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)Secondary· 6 months
The difference between hemoglobin values at the end of the initial study period minus the hemoglobin values at baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
2.3
-25.9 – 41.8
Aza-5-2-2
2.9
-33.0 – 31.7
Aza-5-2-5
5.3
-20.4 – 30.4
Number of Participants Who Improved or Maintained The Hematologic Response From the Initial Study Period (Based on IWG 2000 Criteria For MDS) During the Maintenance PeriodPrimary· 24 months
Hematologic response during the maintenance period are compared to the response in the initial study period. Initial response could have been a complete remission, a partial remission, stable disease or a hematologic improvement. Maintenance period best response is after randomization to a maintenance arm for those randomized, and is after the start of cycle 7 for those remaining on initial period treatment throughout the study.
Improved response from initial study period
Group
Value
95% CI
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks
7
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks
10
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance
12
Maintained response from initial study period
Group
Value
95% CI
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks
6
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks
5
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance
10
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin at the End of the Maintenance Study PeriodSecondary· 24 months
The difference between hemoglobin values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the hemoglobin values at baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks
5.9
-27.9 – 54.8
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks
7.3
-14.4 – 55.5
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance
14.5
-5.5 – 60.4
Baseline Platelet ValuesSecondary· Day 1 (randomization)
The median values for platelets based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for platelets. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
110.0
9.0 – 516.0
Aza-5-2-2
90.0
8.0 – 581.0
Aza-5-2-5
86.0
8.0 – 699.0
Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)Secondary· 6 months
The difference between platelet values at the end of the initial study period minus the platelet values at baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
4.8
-116.3 – 179.1
Aza-5-2-2
5.7
-145.6 – 192.6
Aza-5-2-5
12.6
-300.9 – 213.6
Change From Baseline in Platelets at the End of the Maintenance Study Period (Month 24)Secondary· 24 months
The difference between platelet values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the platelet values at baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks
19.8
-157.5 – 129.6
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks
7.7
-279.8 – 166.3
Initial Period Treatment Continued Into Maintenance
17.3
-124.7 – 223.3
Baseline Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) ValuesSecondary· Day 1 (randomization)
The median values for ANC based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for ANC. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
1.6
0.1 – 13.9
Aza-5-2-2
1.9
0.1 – 162.3
Aza-5-2-5
2.3
0.3 – 139.3
Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) at the End of Initial Study Period (6 Months)Secondary· 6 months
The difference between ANC values at the end of the initial study period minus the ANC values at baseline.
Group
Value
95% CI
Aza-5
-0.3
-4.6 – 1.9
Aza-5-2-2
-0.3
-35.9 – 1.4
Aza-5-2-5
-0.4
-9.7 – 8.5
Adverse events — posted to ClinicalTrials.gov
Time frame: The 3 groups in the Initial Period cover Day 1-6 months, and up to 24 months for participants that continued that treatment. The 2 Maintenance Period groups cover months 7-24 for subjects who were randomized to 1 of the 2 Maintenance treatment arms..
Reporting threshold: 5%.
Adverse-event reports describe events observed during the trial — not all are caused by the drug.
Aza-5
Serious: 18/50 (36%)
Deaths: —
Aza-5-2-2
Serious: 27/50 (54%)
Deaths: —
Aza-5-2-5
Serious: 22/48 (46%)
Deaths: —
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4 Weeks
Serious: 7/22 (32%)
Deaths: —
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6 Weeks
Serious: 13/21 (62%)
Deaths: —
Serious adverse events (103 terms)
Reaction
System
Aza-5
Aza-5-2-2
Aza-5-2-5
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 4…
Maintenance Aza 5 Days q 6…
Anaemia
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
Pneumonia
Infections and infestations
—
—
—
—
—
Febrile neutropenia
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
—
—
—
—
—
Urinary tract infection
Infections and infestations
—
—
—
—
—
Acute myeloid leukaemia
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
—
—
—
—
—
Myelodysplastic syndrome
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
The purpose of this study is to determine if azacitidine, combined with Best Supportive Care (BSC), is effective in treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) when given according to a different doses and dosing schedules.
Publications & conference data
4 peer-reviewed publications reference this trial (live from Europe PMC):
NCT07388563 — Azacitidine and Abatacept in Relapsed or Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT06744556 — HAV Versus DAV/IAV Induction Regimen in Elderly Patients With AML
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06451861 — Randomized Study of ABC-14 Regimen Compared With "3+7" Standard Induction Therapy or AB-14 for ND AML
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06508489 — A Study to Investigate Natural Killer Cell Engager (SAR443579) With Different Agents in Participants With Hematological
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· terminated
NCT06386302 — Chidamide, Venetoclax, and Azacitidine for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
· NA
· recruiting
Other recruiting trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Currently open trials in the same condition.
NCT07566377 — Cord Blood Transplantation in Children and Young Adults With Blood Cancer
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06303193 — Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT07071155 — Momelotinib in Combination With Hypomethylating Agent for Chronic Phase Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Myeloproliferative Ove
· EARLY_PHASE1
· recruiting
NCT06487247 — HEME Home Transfusion Program
· NA
· recruiting
Other Celgene trials
Trials by the same sponsor.
NCT07242781 — A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Itraconazole and Rifampin on the Drug Levels of AR-LDD (BMS-986365) in Healthy Adult M
· Phase 1
· recruiting
NCT06988488 — A Study to Determine the Recommended Dose and Schedule, and Evaluate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of Mezigdomide
· Phase 1, PHASE2
· recruiting
NCT06911502 — A Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Golcadomide in Combination With Rituximab (Golca + R) vs Investigator's Ch
· Phase 3
· recruiting
NCT06808984 — Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of BMS-986368, for the Treatment of Agitation in Participants W
· Phase 2
· recruiting
NCT06782490 — A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of BMS-986368 in Participants With Multiple Sclerosis Spastici
· Phase 2
· recruiting
Publications: Europe PMC API search by NCT ID, retrieved 10 June 2026
Drug + disease cross-links: matched in real time against Drug Landscape's normalised drug + company + condition tables
Sponsor: as reported to ClinicalTrials.gov by Celgene
Last refreshed: 22 November 2019
Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00102687.