Last reviewed · How we verify
A Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Two Antiretroviral Therapeutic Strategies: A Dual PI-Based HAART Regimen Versus a Multi-NRTI ART Regimen, in ART-Experienced Children and Youth Who Have Experienced Virologic Failure
HIV infected children and adolescents who have taken many anti-HIV drugs may have limited treatment options and are at high risk for progressing to AIDS. The purpose of this study is to determine whether an anti-HIV treatment regimen of 2 protease inhibitors (PIs) and 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) is more effective than a regimen of 4 NRTIs in treatment-experienced children and adolescents who have failed previous anti-HIV treatment.
Details
| Lead sponsor | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) |
|---|---|
| Phase | Phase 2 |
| Status | COMPLETED |
| Enrolment | 6 |
| Completion | 2007-05 |
Conditions
- HIV Infections
Interventions
- Abacavir sulfate
- Emtricitabine
- Lamivudine
- Lopinavir/ritonavir
- Saquinavir
- Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
- Zidovudine
Primary outcomes
- Tolerability of dual PI-based HAART versus multi-NRTI HAART salvage regimens (time to first intolerant event)
- 95% confidence interval (CI) for change in CD4% computed for PI-containing groups versus PI-sparing group
- 95% CI for change in BMD (both percent change in BMD and change in z-score from baseline) for each treatment group
Countries
United States