Last reviewed · How we verify

NCT00005017

A Phase IV, Open-Label, Randomized Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Epivir/Ziagen/Zerit (3TC/ABC/d4T) Versus Epivir/Ziagen/Sustiva (3TC/ABC/EFV) Versus Epivir/Ziagen/Agenerase/Norvir (3TC/ABC/APV/RTV) for 96 Weeks in the Treatment of HIV-1 Infected Subjects Who Are Antiretroviral Therapy Naive

Status unknown Phase 4 Last updated 23 June 2005
What this trial tests

Phase 4 trial testing Ritonavir in HIV Infections in 300 participants. Status unknown.

Quick facts

Lead sponsorGlaxo Wellcome
PhasePhase 4
StatusStatus unknown
Study typeINTERVENTIONAL
Primary purposetreatment
Enrollment300
Sites1 location across United States

Drugs / interventions tested

Conditions studied

Sponsor

Glaxo Wellcome — full company profile →

Who can join

18 and older, any sex, with HIV Infections. Patients with the condition only — healthy volunteers not accepted.

Sponsor's own description

The purpose of this study is to see how effective and safe it is to give 1 of the 3 following treatments to patients who may not have received anti-HIV treatment: 1) lamivudine (3TC)/abacavir (ABC)/stavudine (d4T); 2) 3TC/ABC/efavirenz (EFV); or 3) 3TC/ABC/amprenavir (APV)/ritonavir (RTV).

Publications & conference data

No peer-reviewed publications indexed yet for this trial.

Verify or expand the search:

Other trials of Ritonavir

Trials testing the same drug.

Other recruiting trials for HIV Infections

Currently open trials in the same condition.

Verify against primary sources

Data sources for this page

Drug Landscape aggregates and links these public records for informational use only. Always verify against the primary source before clinical or regulatory decisions. Canonical URL: https://druglandscape.com/trial/NCT00005017.

Primary sources · FDA · ClinicalTrials.gov · EMA · SEC EDGAR · ChEMBL · Wikidata · full sourcing