Drug Landscape ›
DYPHYLLINE ›
Regulatory · United States
Marketing authorisations
FDA — authorised 7 March 1951
Application: NDA007794
Marketing authorisation holder: TEVA
Local brand name: NEOTHYLLINE
Indication: TABLET — ORAL
Status: approved
Read official source →
FDA — authorised 16 August 1976
Application: ANDA084566
Marketing authorisation holder: PHARMOBEDIENT
Local brand name: LUFYLLIN
Indication: TABLET — ORAL
Status: approved
Read official source →
FDA — authorised 16 August 1976
Application: ANDA084514
Marketing authorisation holder: SAVAGE LABS
Local brand name: DILOR
Indication: TABLET — ORAL
Status: approved
Read official source →
FDA — authorised 16 August 1976
Application: ANDA084751
Marketing authorisation holder: SAVAGE LABS
Local brand name: DILOR-400
Indication: TABLET — ORAL
Status: approved
Read official source →
FDA
Safety signals — FAERS
Adverse reaction reports describe suspected side effects. A report does not mean the drug caused the event — co-medications, underlying disease and coincidence all contribute.
Window: 20 April 2025 – 20 April 2026
Total reports: 86
Most-reported reactions
Dyspnoea — 10 reports (11.63%) Anxiety — 9 reports (10.47%) Chest Pain — 9 reports (10.47%) Overdose — 9 reports (10.47%) Pain — 9 reports (10.47%) Pneumonia — 9 reports (10.47%) Dizziness — 8 reports (9.3%) Drug Ineffective — 8 reports (9.3%) Nausea — 8 reports (9.3%) Hypersensitivity — 7 reports (8.14%)
Source database →
DYPHYLLINE in other countries
Same drug, different regulators. Each page below lists the local marketing authorisation, HTA position, pricing, and adverse-event data.
Frequently asked questions
Is DYPHYLLINE approved in United States?
Yes. FDA authorised it on 7 March 1951; FDA authorised it on 16 August 1976; FDA authorised it on 16 August 1976.
Who is the marketing authorisation holder for DYPHYLLINE in United States?
TEVA holds the US marketing authorisation.