Drug Landscape ›
dinoprostone vaginal delivery system ›
Regulatory · United States
Marketing authorisation
FDA
Safety signals — FAERS
Adverse reaction reports describe suspected side effects. A report does not mean the drug caused the event — co-medications, underlying disease and coincidence all contribute.
Window: 20 April 2025 – 20 April 2026
Total reports: 23
Most-reported reactions
Caesarean Section — 4 reports (17.39%) Maternal Drugs Affecting Foetus — 4 reports (17.39%) Foetal Death — 3 reports (13.04%) Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation — 2 reports (8.7%) Foetal Distress Syndrome — 2 reports (8.7%) Foetal Exposure During Delivery — 2 reports (8.7%) Postpartum Haemorrhage — 2 reports (8.7%) Uterine Hyperstimulation — 2 reports (8.7%) Anaphylactoid Syndrome Of Pregnancy — 1 report (4.35%) Apgar Score Low — 1 report (4.35%)
Source database →
dinoprostone vaginal delivery system in other countries
Same drug, different regulators. Each page below lists the local marketing authorisation, HTA position, pricing, and adverse-event data.
Frequently asked questions
Is dinoprostone vaginal delivery system approved in United States?
Yes. FDA has authorised it.
Who is the marketing authorisation holder for dinoprostone vaginal delivery system in United States?
University Medical Centre Ljubljana is the originator. The local marketing authorisation holder may differ — check the official source linked above.